'PTA' og Trans-Am cars look pretty good to me. Having said that - looks mean
little to me if it drives like a brick...
I would sum it like this:
GPL is to [the] NR2003 [physics] what IRC2 was compared to GPL.
IMO - of course :)
--
ed_
> GPL is to [the] NR2003 [physics] what IRC2 was compared to GPL.
> IMO - of course :)
GPL is to ICR2 what NR2003 is to N3 is what I think you meant to say!
NR2003 is an evolution of GPL, GPL was no evolution of ICR2.
NR2003 is a work of art though - to transform a lightweight, nimble
thoroughbred race car into a heavy musclebound stock car speaks volumes of
the underlying sim engine. Which makes it even more of a shame it wasn't
used more...
All IMO of course :)
Cheers
Tony
Like I wrote; to me the difference between GPL and NR2003 is jst as great as
the difference between GPL and IRC2. Both being miles ahead of the "previous
version" - if you get my meaning...
--
ed_
> > I would sum it like this:
> > GPL is to [the] NR2003 [physics] what IRC2 was compared to GPL.
> > IMO - of course :)
> Fighting talk!
> GPL is to ICR2 what NR2003 is to N3 is what I think you meant to say!
> NR2003 is an evolution of GPL, GPL was no evolution of ICR2.
> NR2003 is a work of art though - to transform a lightweight, nimble
> thoroughbred race car into a heavy musclebound stock car speaks volumes of
> the underlying sim engine. Which makes it even more of a shame it wasn't
> used more...
And that's IMO, of course ;-)
Nick
> > GPL is to ICR2 what NR2003 is to N3 is what I think you meant to say!
> Acually no - that not what I mean..
> Like I wrote; to me the difference between GPL and NR2003 is jst as great
as
> the difference between GPL and IRC2. Both being miles ahead of the
"previous
> version" - if you get my meaning...
> I was just politely disagreeing with you :)
Line up before the fireing squad at once! Go on - MAAAARCH!!!
:)
--
ed_
