rec.autos.simulators

3dfx or d3d in mgpr2 ??

mike

3dfx or d3d in mgpr2 ??

by mike » Wed, 06 Jan 1999 04:00:00

Hello,
I think this is a stupid question but I will ask it anyway??  I have a 4
meg ati card and a 6 meg Pure3d voodoo 1 card ?  I am running the 3dfx
verion of MGPR2.  I assume this is the faster of the two options !!  Or
do I run the D3D with my Canopus pure 3d card.  I am a bit confused.  If
anyone could enlighten me it would be appreciated.
                                                        Thanks,

Mike

PS: Now if I could just learn to drive theses cars !!! ;-)

Daniel Lichtenberg

3dfx or d3d in mgpr2 ??

by Daniel Lichtenberg » Wed, 06 Jan 1999 04:00:00



Yes it is. Native Glide applications are always faster than their D3D
versions.

Daniel

--
    Daniel Lichtenberger, Vienna/Austria

Rod

3dfx or d3d in mgpr2 ??

by Rod » Wed, 06 Jan 1999 04:00:00

That's correct. I found the Voodoo II version to run liquid smooth and look
graphically better.

-Rod




>>Hello,
>>I think this is a stupid question but I will ask it anyway??  I have a 4
>>meg ati card and a 6 meg Pure3d voodoo 1 card ?  I am running the 3dfx
>>verion of MGPR2.  I assume this is the faster of the two options !!

>Yes it is. Native Glide applications are always faster than their D3D
>versions.

>Daniel

>--
>    Daniel Lichtenberger, Vienna/Austria


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.