First you are comparing two tracks that are not replicating real life all
that well. Both Dega and the Papytona have very relaxed tire wear and fairly
high grip settings. Why? Think of the number of arcade racers (very broad
definition here) that only race Dega online. It is simple marketing, and Im
sure Papy has learned from the GPL "too difficult so Im returning it" sales.
If you were to bring the tires setting to a more realistic stting, Papy-Tona
does become more a handling track in which you have to pay attention to tire
wear and possible even breath off the throttle hear and there. You think
that would work for the masses? na, too many people would actually have to
make a setup.... eeek!
Second, Tona and Dega have some very big differences that an experienced sim
racer or driver would easily recognize. 1) the back straight is shorter, 2)
the tri-oval is longer, 3) the banking is less, 4) the track width is 8'
less, 5) the turns have a shorter radius (1000' vs Degas 1100') These may
not all seem like a lot, but they add up to make a very different track then
Dega
Third, If you know where to look you can see that the Daytona track was
created wrong. it is 2.5 miles around where the apron meets the track, while
Dega is 2.66 miles measured a lane from the outside wall. NASCAR measures
thier tracks at either 10 or 11 feet from the outside wall, that is what
determines if the track is 2.5 or 2.7 miles. Unfortunately, the Papytona is
probably closer to 2.7 miles long because of this simple design flaw. You
can test this theory by driving on the apron holding a speed of 60mph... it
will take you 2.5 minutes to travel the track. Now do it at 10 feet from the
outside wall, it will take you longer than 2.5 min. (60mph = 1 mile per
minute)
----- Original Message -----
Newsgroups: rec.autos.simulators
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2000 7:03 AM
Subject: Daytona - Why the Fuss?
> Howdy,
> I've recently driven the new Daytona track in N3 and was wondering what
> everyone is in such a tizzy about. Sure, the real NASCAR Daytona track
> is known more as a "handling" track than Talladega, and requires more
> of the driver to do well, but that's far from the case with the N3
> version of Daytona. It's simply flat-out-follow-the-guy-in-front-of-
> you just like Talladega is. Different only in name and scenery. I can
> appreciate the mysticism that accompanies the name, but it's really no
> different.
> Welcoming opinions,
> -Chris-
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.
> Howdy,
> I've recently driven the new Daytona track in N3 and was wondering what
> everyone is in such a tizzy about. Sure, the real NASCAR Daytona track
> is known more as a "handling" track than Talladega, and requires more
> of the driver to do well, but that's far from the case with the N3
> version of Daytona. It's simply flat-out-follow-the-guy-in-front-of-
> you just like Talladega is. Different only in name and scenery. I can
> appreciate the mysticism that accompanies the name, but it's really no
> different.
> Welcoming opinions,
> -Chris-
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.