rec.autos.simulators

by **Lars Birkemos** » Mon, 29 Jul 1996 04:00:00

A lot og guys has mumbled about the lack of realism in GP2.
----
Well, I tried out ICR2, and dropped it because I found it to be very
difficult. Some like the "don't touch" feeling of ICR2, and some like
the more arcade stylish GP2. I don't think you can call eihter ICR2 or
GP2 a better sim, it's two different ways of making games,
And lets face it.......
It is still just about playing games, right....

LB

by **Jeff Won** » Tue, 30 Jul 1996 04:00:00

> A lot og guys has mumbled about the lack of realism in GP2.
> ----
> Well, I tried out ICR2, and dropped it because I found it to be very
> difficult. Some like the "don't touch" feeling of ICR2, and some like
> the more arcade stylish GP2. I don't think you can call eihter ICR2 or
> GP2 a better sim, it's two different ways of making games,
> And lets face it.......
> It is still just about playing games, right....

> LB

I agreed totally. Although there will be one or two features that it
would be nice to have, both games are really good in their own rights.
There is no end to simulate anything, e.g. after a while, you might ask
for simulating the driver's social life... (if there is any). So write
your wish list, but don't critize the programmer for not to have done
more!

Jeff

rec.autos.simulators

GP2 Realism

GP2 Realism

GP2 Realism