I recently installed an Intergraph 3D 100 card and purchased Nascar 2.
However, I don't notice much difference in the graphics between
running N2.bat and Renddma.bat. Should there be a noticeable
difference? I have all the graphic options set to on in the game
setup. I have a pentium 100 (don't laugh) and 32Mb. Thanks,
Marc
The effects of bi-linear filtering should be readily apparent on all
the textures in the game. One of the first places you'll notice it is
the first screen after you choose a race with the large picture of the
garage showing the rear of your car.
--
The IWCCCARS Project: Q & A Representative
http://www.theuspits.com/iwcccars/index.html
http://userwww.service.emory.edu/~ebusch/
> I recently installed an Intergraph 3D 100 card and purchased Nascar 2.
> However, I don't notice much difference in the graphics between
> running N2.bat and Renddma.bat. Should there be a noticeable
> difference? I have all the graphic options set to on in the game
> setup. I have a pentium 100 (don't laugh) and 32Mb. Thanks,
> Marc
I also have a P100/32MB system and renddma makes a very significant
difference.
--
Matt Lewis
If you can't see much difference in the graphic quality, then
something's wrong with either the card, the settings within NASCAR or
you eyes.
M.S.Keeler
****************************************************************
http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/town/terrace/abk85/leeker/index.htm
Marc
The differences between fully textured N2.BAT and fully textured
RENDDMA.BAT -are- subtle. Just that pleasing blurring effect (bilinear
filtering?) that reduces blockiness.
I would have thought that your biggest graphical advantage, now that
you've gone rendition, is that you can switch those lovely textures on
:)
Have fun
Mark
Reading, UK
