rec.autos.simulators

Attn: Ed Martin ; Inform us on why no Win95patch with Dos?

Ro

Attn: Ed Martin ; Inform us on why no Win95patch with Dos?

by Ro » Mon, 01 Jul 1996 04:00:00

Hello Ed,
              I have been one of the patient ones in this newsgroup.
As I sift through all the headers each day and see how many have lost
patience with all the anticipation regarding the release of the IRCII
patch, I have tried to comprehend your position while defending the
"delay" issue on your part. I do, however, recall it being stated that
the Windows95 upgrade was to be included with the patch at question.
It would seem like the powers - possibly "Sierra" have chosen to
change this. Could you please elaborate on the previous posts from
Rick regarding this bit of confusion. I hate to say it but I am
feeling a little like others now but I will not start slamming you.
Just losing my faith in Papyrus and Sierra a little.

Thanks,


Anthony Bullo

Attn: Ed Martin ; Inform us on why no Win95patch with Dos?

by Anthony Bullo » Tue, 02 Jul 1996 04:00:00


>Hello Ed,
>              I have been one of the patient ones in this newsgroup.
>As I sift through all the headers each day and see how many have lost
>patience with all the anticipation regarding the release of the IRCII
>patch, I have tried to comprehend your position while defending the
>"delay" issue on your part. I do, however, recall it being stated that
>the Windows95 upgrade was to be included with the patch at question.
>It would seem like the powers - possibly "Sierra" have chosen to
>change this. Could you please elaborate on the previous posts from
>Rick regarding this bit of confusion. I hate to say it but I am
>feeling a little like others now but I will not start slamming you.
>Just losing my faith in Papyrus and Sierra a little.
>Thanks,


Don't do it Ed, silence is golden !!!

Anthony

Chuck Anders

Attn: Ed Martin ; Inform us on why no Win95patch with Dos?

by Chuck Anders » Tue, 02 Jul 1996 04:00:00

Ed,
I have also been one of the quiet ones on the "patch" but
you're gonna lose some loyal followers on this one. Do you
have an official response?
Chuck

: Hello Ed,
: I have been one of the patient ones in this newsgroup.
: <snip>
: Could you please elaborate on the previous posts from
: Just losing my faith in Papyrus and Sierra a little.

: "The patch" is a DOS-only patch.  It brings the DOS version up to date
: with the DOS version in the retail package you saw (that package has
: DOS Win 95 & Mac on 1 CD).  It (the patch) does not change the DOS
: version to Win 95.

Ed Mart

Attn: Ed Martin ; Inform us on why no Win95patch with Dos?

by Ed Mart » Tue, 02 Jul 1996 04:00:00


>Hello Ed,
>              I have been one of the patient ones in this newsgroup.
>As I sift through all the headers each day and see how many have lost
>patience with all the anticipation regarding the release of the IRCII
>patch, I have tried to comprehend your position while defending the
>"delay" issue on your part. I do, however, recall it being stated that
>the Windows95 upgrade was to be included with the patch at question.
>It would seem like the powers - possibly "Sierra" have chosen to
>change this. Could you please elaborate on the previous posts from
>Rick regarding this bit of confusion. I hate to say it but I am
>feeling a little like others now but I will not start slamming you.
>Just losing my faith in Papyrus and Sierra a little.
>Thanks,


OK... here's the latest...

The DOS to Win 95 patch is too big for a downloadable update.
Papyrus/Sierra is working out the details, but the plan is to provide
current owners of DOS ICR II a means to get the new CD & user's guide
for essentially cost of handling. Something along the lines of "send
back your old CD & we'll send out a new one.

That's all the details I have for now.  As soon as I know more, so
will you!

Ed Martin
Producer, Series Director
NASCAR Racing League
Papyrus / Sierra On-Line, Inc.

Clark Arch

Attn: Ed Martin ; Inform us on why no Win95patch with Dos?

by Clark Arch » Tue, 02 Jul 1996 04:00:00

 >OK... here's the latest...
 >
 >The DOS to Win 95 patch is too big for a downloadable update.
 >Papyrus/Sierra is working out the details, but the plan is to provide
 >current owners of DOS ICR II a means to get the new CD & user's guide
 >for essentially cost of handling. Something along the lines of "send
 >back your old CD & we'll send out a new one.
 >
 >That's all the details I have for now.  As soon as I know more, so
 >will you!

Now this is starting to sound good!  I can't wait to rip around the track
knowing that I can wait for a yellow to pit!  This means there will be more to
strategy then figuring out the least amount of fuel to carry at the start!

Clark Archer    Speed Tribe
IVGA #3920      1996 Lola Honda Firestone

Michael E. Carv

Attn: Ed Martin ; Inform us on why no Win95patch with Dos?

by Michael E. Carv » Wed, 03 Jul 1996 04:00:00

: OK... here's the latest...

: The DOS to Win 95 patch is too big for a downloadable update.
: Papyrus/Sierra is working out the details, but the plan is to provide
: current owners of DOS ICR II a means to get the new CD & user's guide
: for essentially cost of handling. Something along the lines of "send
: back your old CD & we'll send out a new one.

Thanks for the update.  This means I will have to clear up some space on
my harddrive for a full installation of ICR2.  As you may have guessed I
am ***ed to virtual racing.  Of course I could spend the down time
perfecting some of my NASCAR talents ;)  You have to be careful here, if
(and that's a big IF) Microprose gets GP2 out before Christmas, you just
might lose a couple of ICR2 ***s while their CD is in the "garage
area" awaiting to new engine!

--
**************************** Michael E. Carver *************************
     Upside out, or inside down...False alarm the only game in town.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<[ /./.  [-  < ]>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Ro

Attn: Ed Martin ; Inform us on why no Win95patch with Dos?

by Ro » Thu, 04 Jul 1996 04:00:00


>OK... here's the latest...

>The DOS to Win 95 patch is too big for a downloadable update.
>Papyrus/Sierra is working out the details, but the plan is to provide
>current owners of DOS ICR II a means to get the new CD & user's guide
>for essentially cost of handling. Something along the lines of "send
>back your old CD & we'll send out a new one.

>That's all the details I have for now.  As soon as I know more, so
>will you!

>Ed Martin
>Producer, Series Director
>NASCAR Racing League
>Papyrus / Sierra On-Line, Inc.

Thanks Ed,
                   That clears things up! Thanks again for keeping us
informed and I will personally try not to press these issues too hard
in the future before knowing who's in charge of what in reference to
your other post about your duties at  "Papyrus / Sierra On-Line, Inc."

Thanks for keeping us informed!
Very much appreciated,

Ron

Bill Pog

Attn: Ed Martin ; Inform us on why no Win95patch with Dos?

by Bill Pog » Sat, 06 Jul 1996 04:00:00

: The DOS to Win 95 patch is too big for a downloadable update.
: Papyrus/Sierra is working out the details, but the plan is to provide
: current owners of DOS ICR II a means to get the new CD & user's guide
: for essentially cost of handling. Something along the lines of "send
: back your old CD & we'll send out a new one.

I can live with this... just let me know when and where to send my stuff!

And just how BIG is a file that is "too big for a downloadable update"?

bill

--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
          .------.       |
     ....'....!...'----/ |
   /'        #3  RASN  : |  
  :--( )------..-( )---  |  
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ronald Stoe

Attn: Ed Martin ; Inform us on why no Win95patch with Dos?

by Ronald Stoe » Sat, 06 Jul 1996 04:00:00

Hi!

Are european icr2 users included in this plan?

l8r
ronny

Scott Maris

Attn: Ed Martin ; Inform us on why no Win95patch with Dos?

by Scott Maris » Tue, 09 Jul 1996 04:00:00


>And just how BIG is a file that is "too big for a downloadable update"?

it's not only that it'd be large, but also the manpower required
to do the patch... there are other issues that we didn't take into
account when this idea came up... Stuff such as DirectX installation,
Win95 Registry issues, and also the Sierra installer/uninstaller.

Basically, we realized it was a bad idea and not worth the effort...
But while I don't know the plans, like you I've heard the new plan
is to offer some sort of trade-up policy where you'd get the new
CD with Dos/Win95/Mac versions of ICR2. Again, I have nothing
to do with this new plan, so I have no idea what it's final shape will
be or when it'll be offered. So don't bother asking... ;-)

/scott

--
Scott Marison, Software Engineer
Sierra On-Line/Papyrus Division

Cie Philli

Attn: Ed Martin ; Inform us on why no Win95patch with Dos?

by Cie Philli » Tue, 09 Jul 1996 04:00:00



>Basically, we realized it was a bad idea and not worth the effort...
>But while I don't know the plans, like you I've heard the new plan
>is to offer some sort of trade-up policy where you'd get the new
>CD with Dos/Win95/Mac versions of ICR2. Again, I have nothing
>to do with this new plan, so I have no idea what it's final shape will
>be or when it'll be offered. So don't bother asking... ;-)

>/scott

>--
>Scott Marison, Software Engineer
>Sierra On-Line/Papyrus Division


 Bullshit!!!!!!!!!!!! Bullshit!!!!!!!!!!!! Bullshit!!!!!!!!!!!!
Bullshit!!!!!!!!!!!!
Neil Yeatma

Attn: Ed Martin ; Inform us on why no Win95patch with Dos?

by Neil Yeatma » Tue, 09 Jul 1996 04:00:00



> >And just how BIG is a file that is "too big for a downloadable update"?

> it's not only that it'd be large, but also the manpower required
> to do the patch... there are other issues that we didn't take into
> account when this idea came up... Stuff such as DirectX installation,
> Win95 Registry issues, and also the Sierra installer/uninstaller.

> Basically, we realized it was a bad idea and not worth the effort...
> But while I don't know the plans, like you I've heard the new plan
> is to offer some sort of trade-up policy where you'd get the new
> CD with Dos/Win95/Mac versions of ICR2. Again, I have nothing
> to do with this new plan, so I have no idea what it's final shape will
> be or when it'll be offered. So don't bother asking... ;-)

Scott,

That's all fine and good, but is there still a DOS patch in the works?

Neil
--
Meek and obedient you follow the leader
down well trodden corridors into the valley of steel..


       Neil Yeatman, Ajax, Ontario, CANADA

Cie Philli

Attn: Ed Martin ; Inform us on why no Win95patch with Dos?

by Cie Philli » Wed, 10 Jul 1996 04:00:00

On Mon, 08 Jul 1996 19:20:53 -0400, Neil Yeatman


>> to do with this new plan, so I have no idea what it's final shape will
>> be or when it'll be offered. So don't bother asking... ;-)

>Scott,

>That's all fine and good, but is there still a DOS patch in the works?

>Neil
>--

At this point, I don't think there is a patch. I've been anxiously
checking this newsgroup and Sierra every single day and now to read
this post from Scott, I don't mind saying, I'm a bit bent out of
shape.
        Just yesterday I was 30 minutes into a Cleveland race when I
was bitten by the yellow flag bug. I was running in 4th but the other
cars were passing the pace car at full speed and I was not allowed to
pass. Soon I was in dead last place. That SUCKS!!!!!!!
        I have purchased everything including Indy 500 The Simulation
and have always been happy with the effort that Papyrus has made to
fix the bugs. ICR1 was a good example. However, we have had ICR2 for 7
months now and they just fixed the paintkit hardly a month ago!! It
seems that we are being swept under the rug.  :-(

-----------.   __   .-----------
     -----    \(  )/    ----- Cie Phillips
        ---   ' \/ `   ---  Phillips MotorSports
          --- :    : ---  #01 Lite Ice Chevy
            --' 01 '--   #01 Lite Ice Reynard Mercedes
              //..\\    http://www.teleplex.net/cie/

             '//||\\`
               ''``

Michael E. Carv

Attn: Ed Martin ; Inform us on why no Win95patch with Dos?

by Michael E. Carv » Wed, 10 Jul 1996 04:00:00


: >
: >Basically, we realized it was a bad idea and not worth the effort...
: >But while I don't know the plans, like you I've heard the new plan
: >is to offer some sort of trade-up policy where you'd get the new
: >CD with Dos/Win95/Mac versions of ICR2. Again, I have nothing
: >to do with this new plan, so I have no idea what it's final shape will
: >be or when it'll be offered. So don't bother asking... ;-)

:  Bullshit!!!!!!!!!!!! Bullshit!!!!!!!!!!!! Bullshit!!!!!!!!!!!!
: Bullshit!!!!!!!!!!!!

Okay, that says alot, but it doesn't say much to me.  I have been very
vocal about my displeasure with the ways things "seem" to have changed
regarding the "upgrade" to the Win95 version.  At least you could let
us know what you consider to be "Bullshit".  Until I hear the "plans"
for the upgrade, I can't really comment.  

So far the Papyrus reps have been doing a good job filling us in on the
progress (all be it the progress is sl-o-o-ow).  It is just as I
projected, a bean-counter realized it was not cost-effective to
"produce" a patch-upgrade to Win95.  This makes sense, it's obvious.
Does it let Sierra/Papyrus off the hook?  Not in my book.  

I am glad that Scott hazarded the "throws of arrows" to give us some
insight into the situation.  (What a terrible sentence! -- and English
is my native tongue!  I should be ashamed.) I am reserving judgement...

Of of course you forgot to quote the important part of Scott's message:
"it's not only that it'd be large, but also the manpower required
to do the patch... there are other issues that we didn't take into
account when this idea came up... Stuff such as DirectX installation,
Win95 Registry issues, and also the Sierra installer/uninstaller."

Of course he was replying to comments made earlier about the "reasoning"
behind not providing a downloadable upgrade.  Which was "Bullshit" in my
book.  I truly believe Scott's latest reason is a good solid one.  It
doesn't answer the question we all have been waiting to hear, but I am
sure when they have an answer, we'll hear it.  Until then the jury is
still out...

--
**************************** Michael E. Carver *************************
     Upside out, or inside down...False alarm the only game in town.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<[ /./.  [-  < ]>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Karl Rau

Attn: Ed Martin ; Inform us on why no Win95patch with Dos?

by Karl Rau » Wed, 10 Jul 1996 04:00:00


>At this point, I don't think there is a patch. I've been anxiously
>checking this newsgroup and Sierra every single day and now to read
>this post from Scott, I don't mind saying, I'm a bit bent out of
>shape.
>    Just yesterday I was 30 minutes into a Cleveland race when I
>was bitten by the yellow flag bug. I was running in 4th but the other
>cars were passing the pace car at full speed and I was not allowed to
>pass. Soon I was in dead last place. That SUCKS!!!!!!!
>    I have purchased everything including Indy 500 The Simulation
>and have always been happy with the effort that Papyrus has made to
>fix the bugs. ICR1 was a good example. However, we have had ICR2 for 7
>months now and they just fixed the paintkit hardly a month ago!! It
>seems that we are being swept under the rug.  :-(

        Apparently it looks that way Cie.  When Nascar 2 was officially
announced, I was all e***d.  Now, I know I'm gonna take a wait and
see approach.  I don't want to buy another Papy product and have to
wait all this time for a bug patch to fix something that shoulda been
done in it's first month of release.  I think we learn from our
mistakes and this is one that I don't want to repeat.
        Besides, F1GP2 is almost out (crossing fingers) and if it's half as
good as it's made up to be, I'm sure we'll all forget that once great
sim company that started with a 'P'

        Karl

        Sick of waiting for the patch that was promised weeks ago - Who does
        Papy think they are, Microprose?  Maybe they hired MP's marketing
        director?


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.