rec.autos.simulators

Attn: Ed Martin ; Inform us on why no Win95patch with Dos?

Ro

Attn: Ed Martin ; Inform us on why no Win95patch with Dos?

by Ro » Wed, 10 Jul 1996 04:00:00




>>And just how BIG is a file that is "too big for a downloadable update"?

>it's not only that it'd be large, but also the manpower required
>to do the patch... there are other issues that we didn't take into
>account when this idea came up... Stuff such as DirectX installation,
>Win95 Registry issues, and also the Sierra installer/uninstaller.

>Basically, we realized it was a bad idea and not worth the effort...
>But while I don't know the plans, like you I've heard the new plan
>is to offer some sort of trade-up policy  

 (snip)

Scott,
           Seems to be mass confusion forming from this thread. I
believe you are refering to the Win95/ICR2 upgrade (patch) which is
not planned as a patch, correct, but rather being worked out as you
stated for an exchange type program. The Dos-fix (patch) for ICR2 is
still in testing at Sierra and soon to be available via download,
correct? Please clear this up.

Thanks,

Ron

Michael E. Carv

Attn: Ed Martin ; Inform us on why no Win95patch with Dos?

by Michael E. Carv » Wed, 10 Jul 1996 04:00:00


: I am glad that Scott hazarded the "throws of arrows" to give us some
: insight into the situation.  (What a terrible sentence! -- and English
: is my native tongue!  I should be ashamed.) I am reserving judgement...

Okay, I don't know why my brains so fogged.  Maybe I have hit the wall
one too many times in ICR2 :)

I think the quote I was searching for is something more in the line of:
"suffer the slings and arrows".

Well I am headed for the in-field medical center, hopefully the doctors
will release me so I can head back out to the track....

--
**************************** Michael E. Carver *************************
     Upside out, or inside down...False alarm the only game in town.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<[ /./.  [-  < ]>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Anthony Bullo

Attn: Ed Martin ; Inform us on why no Win95patch with Dos?

by Anthony Bullo » Wed, 10 Jul 1996 04:00:00



>>And just how BIG is a file that is "too big for a downloadable update"?
>it's not only that it'd be large, but also the manpower required
>to do the patch... there are other issues that we didn't take into
>account when this idea came up... Stuff such as DirectX installation,
>Win95 Registry issues, and also the Sierra installer/uninstaller.
>Basically, we realized it was a bad idea and not worth the effort..

.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This is a VERY bad thing to say, doesn't anyone at Sierra/Papyrus
understand "ethics" you can't say stuff like this and expect people to
feel sorry for you WE paid for the product, maybe next time we will
think it's not worth the EFFORT and get a PIRATED copy, it's
certinally out there but at the moment I am exercising my ethics and
not willing to break any laws to prove a point.

Anthony Bulloch.

>But while I don't know the plans, like you I've heard the new plan
>is to offer some sort of trade-up policy where you'd get the new
>CD with Dos/Win95/Mac versions of ICR2. Again, I have nothing
>to do with this new plan, so I have no idea what it's final shape will
>be or when it'll be offered. So don't bother asking... ;-)
>/scott
>--
>Scott Marison, Software Engineer
>Sierra On-Line/Papyrus Division


Scott Maris

Attn: Ed Martin ; Inform us on why no Win95patch with Dos?

by Scott Maris » Thu, 11 Jul 1996 04:00:00


> Bullshit!!!!!!!!!!!! Bullshit!!!!!!!!!!!! Bullshit!!!!!!!!!!!!
>Bullshit!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'm done with this group - who needs this!!!

/scott

p.s. learn some manners... maybe you forget,
but there are real live people on the receiving
end of your attempt at communication.

--
Scott Marison, Software Engineer
Sierra On-Line/Papyrus Division

Michael E. Carv

Attn: Ed Martin ; Inform us on why no Win95patch with Dos?

by Michael E. Carv » Thu, 11 Jul 1996 04:00:00

: This is a VERY bad thing to say, doesn't anyone at Sierra/Papyrus
: understand "ethics" you can't say stuff like this and expect people to
: feel sorry for you WE paid for the product, maybe next time we will
: think it's not worth the EFFORT and get a PIRATED copy, it's
: certinally out there but at the moment I am exercising my ethics and
: not willing to break any laws to prove a point.

I sympathize with you on this one.  I have had to restrain myself from
going down to my local software store and buying a copy of the "fixed"
version, installing it, and then returning the copy for a full refund.
Unfortunately that approach brings more innocents into this stinking
abyss.

--
**************************** Michael E. Carver *************************
     Upside out, or inside down...False alarm the only game in town.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<[ /./.  [-  < ]>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Joseph Gate

Attn: Ed Martin ; Inform us on why no Win95patch with Dos?

by Joseph Gate » Thu, 11 Jul 1996 04:00:00

Scott

You're so right, but, just a thought, but I think there are many more
here who respect your presence and postings than those vocal minority
always pissing people off

Joseph

Keith Meye

Attn: Ed Martin ; Inform us on why no Win95patch with Dos?

by Keith Meye » Thu, 11 Jul 1996 04:00:00


> Scott

> You're so right, but, just a thought, but I think there are many more
> here who respect your presence and postings than those vocal minority
> always pissing people off

> Joseph

Agreed..... I'm one of them...

Keith

Randy Magrud

Attn: Ed Martin ; Inform us on why no Win95patch with Dos?

by Randy Magrud » Thu, 11 Jul 1996 04:00:00


>I'm done with this group - who needs this!!!
>/scott

Scott...no please don't go.  Just don some teflon and ignore jerks
like this.  I've been flamed enough in these stupid newsgroups that it
doesn't even affect me when someone goes non-linear like this.  I just
laugh it off and only respond to those messages where some modicum of
decency is there.  A great majority of us are grateful you have spent
time and energy helping us out here...and I'd hate for the majority of
appreciative people lose out because one person acts like an ass.  Its
not like the majority can do a lot to shut people like this up.

Randy

John Wallac

Attn: Ed Martin ; Inform us on why no Win95patch with Dos?

by John Wallac » Thu, 11 Jul 1996 04:00:00



Another valuable asset to the group disappears, drowned under a weight
of vitriolic taurean scatology.

Good work people....
John

PS - Most will be sorry to see you go Scott, maybe you can stage a
comeback if you find the twit-filte...em, kill-file on your newsreader?

                     _________________________________
         __    _____|                                 |_____    __
________|  |__|    :|           John Wallace          |     |__|  |________

  \    :|  |::|    :|        Team WW Racing TSW       |     |::|  |     /
    >  :|  |::|    :|_________________________________|     |::|  |   <
  /    :|__|::|____/       * Sim Racing News *         \____|::|__|     \
/______:/  \::/ http://sneezy.dcn.ed.ac.uk/simnews/index.htm \::/  \._____\
               http://www.math.ohio-state.edu/~harmon/simnews

Big Do

Attn: Ed Martin ; Inform us on why no Win95patch with Dos?

by Big Do » Thu, 11 Jul 1996 04:00:00

On Wed, 10 Jul 1996 18:56:12 +0100, John Wallace

< vitriolic taurean scatology.

Let's see.... 3 - $1.50  words........ That earns you a grand total
$4.50 US.  :-)

David Spark

Attn: Ed Martin ; Inform us on why no Win95patch with Dos?

by David Spark » Fri, 12 Jul 1996 04:00:00



>: I am glad that Scott hazarded the "throws of arrows" to give us some
>: insight into the situation.  (What a terrible sentence! -- and English
>: is my native tongue!  I should be ashamed.) I am reserving judgement...

>Okay, I don't know why my brains so fogged.  Maybe I have hit the wall
>one too many times in ICR2 :)

>I think the quote I was searching for is something more in the line of:
>"suffer the slings and arrows".

>Well I am headed for the in-field medical center, hopefully the doctors
>will release me so I can head back out to the track....

In your condition... I HOPE NOT! <g>

Dave "davids" Sparks
Sequoia Motorsports

Jo

Attn: Ed Martin ; Inform us on why no Win95patch with Dos?

by Jo » Fri, 12 Jul 1996 04:00:00



>> Bullshit!!!!!!!!!!!! Bullshit!!!!!!!!!!!! Bullshit!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>Bullshit!!!!!!!!!!!!
>I'm done with this group - who needs this!!!
>/scott
>p.s. learn some manners... maybe you forget,
>but there are real live people on the receiving
>end of your attempt at communication.
>--
>Scott Marison, Software Engineer
>Sierra On-Line/Papyrus Division


Please, Scott, understand that it isn't the group you should be done
with, but rather any individual that you find disrespectful. A
programming guy like you should be able to make a kill-file to sift
out authors proven in the past to be disrespectful.

And while we feel bad for you that people are flaming you, you need to
appreciate why some people are feeling so angry. It has been 8 months
for those of us who bought ICR2 in november, and nobody has leveled
with us as to why we haven't had a fix for some debilitating bugs in
ICR2. I haven't used ICR2 in a long time; the bugs just make it not
worth the energy I need to put in to it (esp. the weight shift bug).
Now there is a supposedly working version out with all sorts of
frills, and the original buyers, clearly those people who care the
most about the product and serve as Papyrus' most faithful customers,
are sitting on the sidelines wondering why they can't use the product
they paid for long, long ago. On top of that, we discover that Papyrus
now believes it was a bad idea to offer the new fully working version
to the original customers... this is unbearable. Of course a company
would think this is a bad idea; they have our money, and there is
nothing we can do about it. Some people are going to flame, and if
that is a surprise to you, you must be new to the debacle that has
been brewing since christmas.

I feel intuitively that the Sierra buyout had something to do with the
sudden change in quality of Papyrus' support of their products. If
Sierra isn't going to honor Papyrus' original customers, I know for
one that this customer won't be a customer of Sierra anymore. And I
think I speak for a lot of people in this newsgroup.

Anyway, sorry you have been flamed; your posts have been unusually
open and fresh for those of us that have been following the progress
so far. I hope you change your mind and stick with your product
online.

John Wallac

Attn: Ed Martin ; Inform us on why no Win95patch with Dos?

by John Wallac » Fri, 12 Jul 1996 04:00:00


Aww c'mon - it was on a triple word score.... :)

                     _________________________________
         __    _____|                                 |_____    __
________|  |__|    :|           John Wallace          |     |__|  |________

  \    :|  |::|    :|        Team WW Racing TSW       |     |::|  |     /
    >  :|  |::|    :|_________________________________|     |::|  |   <
  /    :|__|::|____/       * Sim Racing News *         \____|::|__|     \
/______:/  \::/ http://sneezy.dcn.ed.ac.uk/simnews/index.htm \::/  \._____\
               http://www.math.ohio-state.edu/~harmon/simnews

Mike Donnel

Attn: Ed Martin ; Inform us on why no Win95patch with Dos?

by Mike Donnel » Fri, 12 Jul 1996 04:00:00


reguard to reality...


>> Bullshit!!!!!!!!!!!! Bullshit!!!!!!!!!!!! Bullshit!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>Bullshit!!!!!!!!!!!!

>I'm done with this group - who needs this!!!
>--
>Scott Marison, Software Engineer
>Sierra On-Line/Papyrus Division


Thank you Cie.  Now that you drove our friendly technical crew at Papyrus
off the newsgroup, I  hope you're proud of yourself.  Personally, I don't
blame him for not wanting to put up with that kind of thing.

Mike

--
___^___ Speed Bump Motorsports...  The name says it all.
NRL95 #110 Hershey's Kisses Chevrolet Monte Carlo
PRO95 #53 Hershey's Kisses Penske PC23/Ilmor D
SIMCAR96 #45 Hershey's Kisses Pontiac Grand Prix
PRO96 #2 Hershey's Kisses Reynard/Ford/Firestone - Pucker Factor Motorsports
IVGA #2027 (membership, not the car!)


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.