I think I remember reading somewhere the first patch due for F1RC was being
released on the 15th or 16th April? Has anyone seen it, and whats it
supposed to fix (hopefully the damn AI!)?
> > I think I remember reading somewhere the first patch due for F1RC was
> being
> > released on the 15th or 16th April? Has anyone seen it, and whats it
> > supposed to fix (hopefully the damn AI!)?
> >Well I mean thats what I figured too, being Easter weekend. Companies
> >usually dont even release stuff over weekends, so being holidays is even
> >stranger. But then thats the date they said, so....
> Giving a date for a patch is a bit dim, IMO. How can they know when a
> patch will be done ahead of time? Doesn't jive with me and shouldn't
> with you guys either.
Papy is being flamed being non-commital to a patch let alone
a date, and it's likely Ubisoft will be flamed for being commital
for a patch, but missing the date.
Unless the patch had been submitted for final testing before the
date was given, then I would be skeptical of the date. It's done
when it's done, but a patch is in the works is good enough for
me.
Cheers,
Rod.
> > >Well I mean thats what I figured too, being Easter weekend. Companies
> > >usually dont even release stuff over weekends, so being holidays is
even
> > >stranger. But then thats the date they said, so....
> > Giving a date for a patch is a bit dim, IMO. How can they know when a
> > patch will be done ahead of time? Doesn't jive with me and shouldn't
> > with you guys either.
> It sort of works both ways though, or a case of you're damned
> if you do or you're damned if you don't.
> Papy is being flamed being non-commital to a patch let alone
> a date, and it's likely Ubisoft will be flamed for being commital
> for a patch, but missing the date.
> Unless the patch had been submitted for final testing before the
> date was given, then I would be skeptical of the date. It's done
> when it's done, but a patch is in the works is good enough for
> me.
> Cheers,
> Rod.
Ben
>> says...
>> > On Mon, 16 Apr 2001 12:12:32 GMT, "Matt"
>> > >Well I mean thats what I figured too, being Easter weekend. Companies
>> > >usually dont even release stuff over weekends, so being holidays is
>even
>> > >stranger. But then thats the date they said, so....
>> > Giving a date for a patch is a bit dim, IMO. How can they know when a
>> > patch will be done ahead of time? Doesn't jive with me and shouldn't
>> > with you guys either.
>> It sort of works both ways though, or a case of you're damned
>> if you do or you're damned if you don't.
>> Papy is being flamed being non-commital to a patch let alone
>> a date, and it's likely Ubisoft will be flamed for being commital
>> for a patch, but missing the date.
>> Unless the patch had been submitted for final testing before the
>> date was given, then I would be skeptical of the date. It's done
>> when it's done, but a patch is in the works is good enough for
>> me.
>> Cheers,
>> Rod.
> > says...
> > > On Mon, 16 Apr 2001 12:12:32 GMT, "Matt"
> > > >Well I mean thats what I figured too, being Easter weekend. Companies
> > > >usually dont even release stuff over weekends, so being holidays is
> even
> > > >stranger. But then thats the date they said, so....
> > > Giving a date for a patch is a bit dim, IMO. How can they know when a
> > > patch will be done ahead of time? Doesn't jive with me and shouldn't
> > > with you guys either.
> > It sort of works both ways though, or a case of you're damned
> > if you do or you're damned if you don't.
> > Papy is being flamed being non-commital to a patch let alone
> > a date, and it's likely Ubisoft will be flamed for being commital
> > for a patch, but missing the date.
> > Unless the patch had been submitted for final testing before the
> > date was given, then I would be skeptical of the date. It's done
> > when it's done, but a patch is in the works is good enough for
> > me.
> > Cheers,
> > Rod.