stone, where you belong.
> Sorry to have somehow? gotten you involved in this. Apparently you have
> a stalker!? He CANNOT read email headers obviously - but that does not
> seem to stop his claims of knowledge - LOL
> A few laughs at him initially... but then it just plain gets stupid and
> boring... he doesn't know what the hell he is talking about nor what he
> is claiming. He's nothing but a loud-mouthed little shitwad.
> I suggest you plonk and/or otherwise ignore him as "feeding" the brainless
> *** only makes him hang around more.
> Again, apologies that the mindless reject focused his limited attention to
> you.... but you can imagine that I never would have expected that or saw
> it coming.
> Perhaps we (you and I) could offer to drop by the losers home and let him
> see we are not one and the same... but of course that won't happen as this
> "type" is most often nothing but a wannabe person - not worth thinking
> about - and certainly not going to step up to another man. He is
> probably a huge coward and that is why he enjoys this "safe way" of
> insulting, provoking and otherwise annoying people.
> Regards
> 0-0-0-0-0-0
>> Hahaha, your <====> header has now been compared with an email you sent,
>> so
>> we know it's you, Dave. Now you won't be able to post anonymously from
>> your
>> usual email client. You're have to go a create another web base account,
>> like you did for this post.
>> Like you weren't going to attack iRacing on behalf of you r2r master on
>> this
>> front!
>> You lose, you loser. HAHAHAHAHAH LOL!
>> We are legion
>> PS, Thanks for coming out and denying it so quickly. That remove any
>> element
>> of doubt from our minds that it was you.
>> > I think you're being a bit dim. 12 to 14 closely matched cars and
>> > drivers
>> > is
>> > plenty to race against.
>> > Some of the beta testers have stated that they've raced with big grids.
>> > I
>> > think the number 30 was mentioned.
>> > This sounds just like the kind of stuff David G Fisher used to come out
>> > with
>> > when GPL first arrived.
>> > Here's a reminder from ten years hence:
>> > >GPL is not the first racing sim/game to offer TCP/IP racing. It's far
>> > >from
>> > >it. Yet, even though it has the advantage of being the most recent
>> > >release,
>> > >it's performance on the net is disappointing. I'm at the point now
>> > >with
>> > >GPL
>> > >online that I don't even care what the reasons are for performance
>> > >problems. If too much info is being sent, then they should of cut back
>> > >on
>> > >the unnecessary info and just sent the essential. They should of
>> > >simply
>> > >copied whatever other sim developers did that works.
>> >http://www.racesimcentral.net/
>> > Of course where was nothing wrong with GPL's net code and when that
>> > became
>> > apparent, he just switched his attack to a different angle.
>> > > Hmmmmm
>> > > Not sure quite what to say other than to comment on how it seems that
>> > > no-one will answer the question.
>> > > (at least Uwe honestly stated 12-14 in his experience T.Y. Uwe) --
>> > > Everyone else provides "fluff" responses IMHO
>> > > "The system is far more complicated than a single question like "How
>> > > many
>> > > can race at once"
>> > > -- this sounds like a Bush statement -- it has ZERO information or
>> > > facts,
>> > > but lovely propaganda.
>> > > "The lower series (which they all are right now) have smaller fields
>> > > (and
>> > > shorter races in some cases). The top-tiers will be full tracks. :)"
>> > > -- this again really tells me (us) nothing at all. Zero facts. Or
>> > > should
>> > > one assume a "full track" is 14 drivers (see above)?
>> > > iRacing must be very complicated if no-one can, or will, admit to the
>> > > MAXIMUM NUMBER of drivers online at once.
>> > > I am asking what would appear to me to be a simple enough question.
>> > > I've
>> > > worked in the computer industry for 25 years.... I would feel pretty
>> > > uncomfortable using the answers provided here to present my software
>> > > to
>> > > anyone.
>> > > "It's complicated"
>> > > "It's gets bigger and better later"
>> > > It looks like .... "smoke and mirrors".
>> > > Please ~~ anyone ~~ that can answer a simple question. Please do so.
>> > > It would seem clear enough to me that BETA testers would have
>> > > actually
>> > > tested how many users/drivers the sim can support online at once. Am
>> > > I
>> > > crazy? Wasn't this tested ?? If not.... who and what WAS tested?
>> > > Call me frustrated..
>> > > -==-
>> > >> > What kind of numbers online Larry?
>> > >> > Will it support 50+ 60+ ?? drivers in a race?
>> > >> > Has that been tested? What's the highest number you have been
>> > >> > online
>> > >> > with?
>> > >> > Thanks in advance
>> > >> Earlier on (about last year)iRacingheld some fun races with 40+
>> > >> drivers which seemed to work out fine, in the current format the
>> > >> maximum number of racers is limited to 12-14 I believe, depending on
>> > >> the series and kind of track being run (roadie or oval). A larger
>> > >> field will automatically be split on to several race servers (say
>> > >> you
>> > >> have 16 peeps registered for a 12 max race, you'll end up on a
>> > >> server
>> > >> with 8 racers each).
>> > >> Cheers, uwe
>> > >> --
>> > > The lower series (which they all are right now) have smaller fields
>> > > (and shorter races in some cases). The top-tiers will be full
>> > > tracks. :)- Hide quoted text -
>> > - Show quoted text -
>> Sorry tiny, but you are wrong.
>> BTW, I was one of a very, very small group who were chosen to beta
>> test VROC by one of it's main developers. That same developer gave me
>> beta testing duties when he moved on to another company afterwards.
>> Think about that for a moment. Feeling as stupid as your nickname?- Hide
>> quoted text -
>> - Show quoted text -
> Now you've resorted to complete and total lies about e-mails/headers.
> Pathetic.