rec.autos.simulators

Definitely not "definately"!

Joachim Trens

Definitely not "definately"!

by Joachim Trens » Sun, 14 Sep 2003 06:07:33

I remember him, and now, he doesn't play FB with us anymore. I guess he's
allways busy <g>

Achim


...
...

Sue

Definitely not "definately"!

by Sue » Sun, 14 Sep 2003 06:05:28






> > > Now no one knows the diff between "loose" and "lose". This is easily the
> > > most common mistake I see.



> > > > The most common spelling error when i was at school....it still bugs
> me
> > > now
> > > > when i see it wrong lol

> > > > AD

> > I beg to differ.  The most common error is not "loose"/"lose"  its
> > "its"/"it's".   ;o)

> > Elrikk

> > PS.  Yeah, I know it's "it's".

> Wrong, dictionary breath, it's separate, most commonly misspelled as
> "seperate".

> :)

> Alanb

then there are those who type suprise instead of surprise :-)
Sue

Definitely not "definately"!

by Sue » Sun, 14 Sep 2003 06:06:20



> > Tell you what REALLY gets up my nose - adding an s after an apostrophe ....
> > Jesus's, Simmonds's ..... <AAAARGH!> drives me nuts.

> How about websight ?

> I like this thread :-)

:-) Goy your (not you're!) spelling is better than a lot who have English as their FIRST language
Sue

Definitely not "definately"!

by Sue » Sun, 14 Sep 2003 06:11:10



> > How about "noone" instead of "no one"?

> <blush>

lol
Goy Larse

Definitely not "definately"!

by Goy Larse » Sun, 14 Sep 2003 06:17:02




>  I can only conclude that they can't read or are
> > actually out steeling empty boxes

> > Beers and cheers
> > (uncle) Goy
> > "goyl at nettx dot no"

> Steeling, Uncle? :-)

Ignorance is a bliss.....

Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
"goyl at nettx dot no"

http://www.theuspits.com

"A man is only as old as the woman he feels........"
--Groucho Marx--

Goy Larse

Definitely not "definately"!

by Goy Larse » Sun, 14 Sep 2003 06:17:08




> > > Tell you what REALLY gets up my nose - adding an s after an apostrophe ....
> > > Jesus's, Simmonds's ..... <AAAARGH!> drives me nuts.

> > How about websight ?

> > I like this thread :-)
> :-) Goy your (not you're!) spelling is better than a lot who have English as their FIRST language

Yeah, but apparently I can't spell steal......

Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
"goyl at nettx dot no"

http://www.theuspits.com

"A man is only as old as the woman he feels........"
--Groucho Marx--

Sue

Definitely not "definately"!

by Sue » Sun, 14 Sep 2003 06:16:44



> > If it's any consolation, from my direct observations, I would say that we
> > are also breeding a society of mouth-breathing morons in Canada, the USA,
> > Germany and Switzerland. Same philosophy... the grades for which I busted my
> > ass, even as recently as in the 1980s, are now given away to provide
> > everyone with a touchy-feely, "I'm ok and so are you" sensation.   :-)

> Same in Norway, kids can't read worth a damn, in my shop there are
> several signs that says the boxes on display are empty, since the boxes
> keep disappearing I can only conclude that they can't read or are
> actually out steeling empty boxes

you mean 'stealing' empty boxes? ;-)
Sue

Definitely not "definately"!

by Sue » Sun, 14 Sep 2003 06:17:06




>  I can only conclude that they can't read or are
> > actually out steeling empty boxes

> > Beers and cheers
> > (uncle) Goy
> > "goyl at nettx dot no"

> Steeling, Uncle? :-)

LOL! great minds think alike :-))
Sue

Definitely not "definately"!

by Sue » Sun, 14 Sep 2003 06:20:46


> On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 18:29:20 +1000, "Bruce Kennewell"

> >Jeez!
> >The number of people who stuff-up the spelling of this word is incredible
> >and has finally irritated me to the point of posting this stupid message!

> >For those of you who haven't a clue as to how to spell, for "definite", just
> >think of the word "finite" and stick a ***y "de" in front of it.

> >(Even the Wests can't spell it properly!)

> >Rant over; go about your normal business.

> >Bruce the Bellicose.

> I am going back to college, and a couple of weeks ago, I was stunned
> when in class one of my professors stated that no one would be
> required to read out loud in class, due to the fact that numerous
> students couldn't read.  WTH???????  This was a Junior level class,
> WTH are the teachers teaching these kids?  Yet, it suddenly dawns on
> me, most of these people post on usenet.  LOL

That would be funny if it were not probably true! Just you wait, the next generation will not only not know how to spell because
of just using a spell checker, but they will also be a lot worse when it comes to handwriting, due to everything being typed all
the time.
Its already pretty bad. It gives me a headache reading all these sentences with things like "where r u? / can u c me b4 I go?"
etc
Sue

Definitely not "definately"!

by Sue » Sun, 14 Sep 2003 06:10:43



> > Tell you what REALLY gets up my nose - adding an s after an apostrophe
> ....
> > Jesus's, Simmonds's ..... <AAAARGH!> drives me nuts.

This one depends on the context.
Example:
John is coming to see me is correct as "John's coming to see me." But "John's car" would actually mean John is car, which is
wrong of course
Sue

Definitely not "definately"!

by Sue » Sun, 14 Sep 2003 06:15:38


> Then you should have watched "That'll teach them" - a UK reality TV show
> wherein 30 14 y-olds go back to a 1950's school with a1950's curriculum and
> 1950's discipline.
> Nothing short of jaw-dropping.
> Pupils estimated as likely to achieve "A" or "A-star" in GCSE French (among
> other subjects), spectacularly failed mock O-level's.
> Of the 30, there were fewer than 5 O-level passes - none of which was above
> "C" - which fits the statistically-substantiated pattern of educational
> decline and dumbing down witnessed since the 1980's (rising pass rates every
> year - 45% more at GCSE in the last 10 years alone).
> A relic methinx, of the "Let-it-all-hang-out" 60's - when UK society decided
> that it would be much nicer if nobody should have to suffer the anguish and
> ignominy of academic or sporting failure again.
> So let's lower the bar so everyone can get over.
> Duh!
> What about the kids it's failing ? - not least the bright ones who are never
> challenged.
> Things need to be turned around - Britain's becoming the dunce of Europe.

Its the same in the US, in fact probably worse I would say. I heard recently of them lowering the level to pass some exam or
other because not enough students this year passed. Never mind anything logical like trying to IMPROVE the system so the kids
learn enough to pass at the previous level!
Over here there is a lot of emphasis put on students getting "straight A" grades. This is something I had never heard of growing
up in the UK, and to me its ridiculous. If you are getting an A in everything in school, then either the work is too easy for
you and you need to be pushed a bit harder IMO. Unless you are a child genius, which very few are, I see nothing to brag about
with regard to straight A grades.

- Show quoted text -



> > Jeez!
> > The number of people who stuff-up the spelling of this word is incredible
> > and has finally irritated me to the point of posting this stupid message!

> > For those of you who haven't a clue as to how to spell, for "definite",
> just
> > think of the word "finite" and stick a ***y "de" in front of it.

> > (Even the Wests can't spell it properly!)

> > Rant over; go about your normal business.

> > Bruce the Bellicose.

Goy Larse

Definitely not "definately"!

by Goy Larse » Sun, 14 Sep 2003 06:34:36






> >  I can only conclude that they can't read or are
> > > actually out steeling empty boxes

> > > Beers and cheers
> > > (uncle) Goy
> > > "goyl at nettx dot no"

> > Steeling, Uncle? :-)

> LOL! great minds think alike :-))

You haven't been around "Bomber" much have you ?

Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
"goyl at nettx dot no"

http://www.theuspits.com

"A man is only as old as the woman he feels........"
--Groucho Marx--

Alan Bernard

Definitely not "definately"!

by Alan Bernard » Sun, 14 Sep 2003 06:48:43




> > > Tell you what REALLY gets up my nose - adding an s after an apostrophe
> > ....
> > > Jesus's, Simmonds's ..... <AAAARGH!> drives me nuts.

> This one depends on the context.
> Example:
> John is coming to see me is correct as "John's coming to see me." But

"John's car" would actually mean John is car, which is
Eh?  "John's car is broken."

I have never seen anyone write "John's car", wanting to mean "John is car".
No one makes that mistake.

You'll see stuff like "The team's are coming onto the field" or "The teams
mascot did a flip".  But you'll never see "John's car", with the writer
intending "John is car".  No one thinks "John is car" is a sentence.  The
writer knows instinctively that a descriptive word goes in that "predicate
adjective" slot.

Alanb

Bruce Kennewel

Definitely not "definately"!

by Bruce Kennewel » Sun, 14 Sep 2003 07:20:23

A similar situation occurred here (Oz) in the 1970's, when the education
departments of various states dropped all emphasis on spelling as a basic
requirement in all levels of the English curriculum in primary schools.

It was considered more important that the child be allowed to freely express
him/herself without worrying about the constraints of conventional spelling.

Fine in theory - disaster in practise. The child left high-school and came
up against a class of people for whom correct spelling was a simple fact of
life: the older employer who had a traditional, conventional education.

Between 1984 and 1993 I employed at least two new apprentices (Electrician)
each year and, as part of the process, I would receive upwards of thirty
applications. We couldn't employ that many and neither could we interview
them all, so we had to reduce the field to something workable.
The very first level of the weeding-out process was to reject any letters of
application which contained more than three spelling errors of common words,
which usually reduced the number by at least half.

I will always remember that, in 1987, if I had stuck to this system, *ALL*
applications would have been rejected!

Bruce.


Bruce Kennewel

Definitely not "definately"!

by Bruce Kennewel » Sun, 14 Sep 2003 07:23:28

"Thieving"
"Pinching"
"Knocking-off"

Some alternatives for you, Goy old mate. :)

Bruce.



rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.