rec.autos.simulators

RASCAR: Richmond Race Reminder

David G Fishe

RASCAR: Richmond Race Reminder

by David G Fishe » Sun, 07 Sep 2003 16:06:48

Sat.
Richmond
3 pm est server opens for 90 min practice
Server Name:  ~Extreme~TSW2
40% race distance
Yellows on

David G Fisher

Neil Charlto

RASCAR: Richmond Race Reminder

by Neil Charlto » Sun, 07 Sep 2003 18:57:42



[snip]

I'll give it a go but if it goes the way I fear I'll make an early exit.

cya there

Jan Verschuere

RASCAR: Richmond Race Reminder

by Jan Verschuere » Sun, 07 Sep 2003 20:01:47

Sorry Neil, but I've had it up to here with this defeatist attitude which
permeates throughout NASCAR online.

If everybody just kept their mind on the job and gave the other drivers the
credit they'd like to receive in return, the number of yellows would be
halved overnight.

Expecting it to suck (or thinking the track or setup sucks) will deminish
the amount of effort en concentration you're willing to put into the race in
order to make it work and that only contributes to drag a race down. It
really does help if everyone's keyed up at the prospect of the race. It also
keeps morale up if there is a couple of successive quick yellows.

So cheer up, think positive!! ;-))

Jan.
=---

Neil Charlto

RASCAR: Richmond Race Reminder

by Neil Charlto » Sun, 07 Sep 2003 21:13:47


Not defeatist Jan - a pessimist is merely an optimist with experience of
life ;)

No arguments here but experience has shown is isn't so much a matter of
keeping the mind on the job as basic car control.

I don't think any track sucks. If anything, I go better on short tracks road
courses - it's only the SS that bore me to tears. Fearing the worst does not
imply I would put in less offort or concentration. A more sensitive chap
could get annoyed at the mere suggestion ;)

I am positive Jan. I was positive we were going to give no yellows a chance.
I appreciate I am in a minority in this respect and I always go with what
the group decides. However, I do not expect to have my committment
questioned when I do voice my opinion. My opinion is this: if we go back to
yellows on with no other mechanism for keeping the yellows down other than
hoping for the best I know that my Saturday night 'fun-factor' will be
diminished. I'm not basing this on pessimism just on a reasonably long
experience with RASCAR. My last intent was to 'piss people off' - I've
always thought of myself as a reasonable guy. If my swimming against the
mainstream opinion is getting on people's nerves I'll withdraw. In fact,
I'll start with tonight.

Regards

John Simmon

RASCAR: Richmond Race Reminder

by John Simmon » Sun, 07 Sep 2003 21:32:42


says...



> > So cheer up, think positive!! ;-))

> I am positive Jan. I was positive we were going to give no yellows a chance.
> I appreciate I am in a minority in this respect and I always go with what
> the group decides.

I was under the same impression. Does anyone know why yellows are on
now, or was this a seemingly arbitrary decision made by the admins
without the democratic approval of the group?  (Sorry guys, I
couldn't resist this opportunity.)

Since I'm not in RASCAR any longer (and hence, not on the mailing
list), and since there's almost no message traffic on the forum
anymore, I have to rely on stuff being posted here.

Of course, it could be something as simple as a typo, or something
done out of habit.

Hmmmm...  Sounds like what I had been saying all along.

Again, sounds like what I was saying. Be careful here, Neil.

:)

Jan Verschuere

RASCAR: Richmond Race Reminder

by Jan Verschuere » Mon, 08 Sep 2003 00:39:01

A pessimistic view is not nescessarily a realistic view. There is no real
reason to believe tonights race will feature an excessive amount of yellows.
It would unrealistic to expect no yellows (as in no yellows occuring). Some
things just can't be avoided. In view of the week he'd had, I'm sure Kurt
Busch would have avoided getting into Sterling Marlin if he could have
helped it, but things just happen and you have to get on with what results
of the situation.

Everybody in RASCAR has enough car control to avoid the avoidable, it's all
in the mind. It's all about discipline in preparation and on the track.  One
either has to discipline oneself to practise before the race and turn up
well prepared (that means unlikely to have to explore the unknown in order
to react to an on-track situation) or one has to discipline oneself to stay
within one's basic capabilities. The time to find out you can't hold a
particular line in a fight for position is in practise, not during the race.
One can't "try" to overtake another driver in the race. One has to know
whether one can do it that way or not before deciding to "try" and take that
position away.

I believe that raising awareness and raising group morale (more on that
later) will benifit the races and that's why I challenge those who focus on
the negative.

Translation: "I lack the discipline to stay focussed at Super Speedways."
<vwg>

We might be getting into semantics here, but I consider it a logic
impossibility to give a race your full attention if you decide in advance it
will have to meet certain criteria for it to keep your attention. I don't
even mind if that point of view upsets you... I have to take the edge of
that speed of yours in some way or another. ;-))

There was an overwhelming majority that wanted to run Darlington with
yellows off (mine was the minority vote on that one), but I understood the
vote as being specific to that race, which appears to have been the correct
interpretation.

Running without yellows is being considered, but you have to admit there
hasn't been a lot of feedback on the issue. There's been almost zero talk
about Darlington. I think people have clammed up for fear of causing another
blow-out. Some are clearly looking at me to make some choice comments on
several incidents (not all of them involving contact), but I haven't seen
the server replay (I turned down the number of cars shown to improve
framerate so my local replay doesn't tell the whole story on this one) yet
so it's hard for me to step forward. It's also hard for Mitch and Dave to
change the format on a permanent basis without input or hearing at least
some different opinions on the Darlington no-yellows race.

If I may turn things around for a moment, I was surprised to see the
majority on the no-yellows vote for Darlington go against me. When that was
said and done though, I got on with it and tried to turn the situation to
the best of my advantage. I did enjoy it less than some of the low yellow
count races we've had, but I was competitive with those on the same strategy
and I got a good placing out of it. That wouldn't have happened if I'd
dropped my head and gone in thinking I'd be wrecked and forced out of
contention. As it turns out I was forced out of contention by Huggings,
Ginger and others because they managed to go a lot quicker and still get 45
laps out of their tyres, but that doesn't alter my outlook. I'm in it to win
it and I enjoy stepping up to the challenges the races pose, whatever they
may be (yes: even if that means keeping focus and drive when dawdling around
behind the pacecar).

Yet you do seem to enter these races with two motives which cannot always
co-exist: to do well in the race and to have fun. You can choose to battle
for position extensively early in the race and have fun, but it will slow
you down and deminish your chances of actually winning the race (especially
if you get into an accident). On the other hand, a couple of guys must
finish 1, 2 and 3, even in a messy/boring race. It's up to you how to juggle
those motives as you compete.

It's not hoping for the best. Being positive and confident and instilling
that in others does help.

SAS soldiers are incredibly fit, undergo constant and advanced training and
are exceptionally well equipped, but the real reason they are better than
regular troops is they have utter and unwavering belief in their abilities /
their commanders and their ability to sublimate anything and everything to
the job in hand. A squaddie might think "Oh man... a field excercise.
Setting and breaking up camp every day, eating bland personal rations, not
getting myself clean properly, the rain, the mud, the heat/the cold, the
insects....". An SAS trooper receives his instructions and then goes ahead
and does it. It's a mindset... and a mindset that can be promoted.

I am confident I can run in the race tonight and avoid the avoidable, I'm
confident most of the others can too if they've got their heads screwed on
rigth. I'm not entirely confident about that last bit, but I wasn't going to
let that show, if you understand what I mean.

...reasonably long experience of focussing on the negatives in RASCAR,
rather. <vwg>

I might have agreed with you before I started doing the reviews and really
paying attention to people's driving, but I cannot agree now. It's not a
matter of car control, but of self control. It's a matter of getting people
to avaluate their driving without feeling insulted. That can only be done by
pointing out the positive while mentioning the negative.

I thought I made it clear you merely tipped the scales for me to make a
public statement. I'm not pissed off. I'm a little annoyed, just like I was
when Eldred condemned the Bristol race to a yellow fest before it even
started.

You can say "I'd like to see yellows of in RASCAR races because..." as much
as you like. People will be yelling for us to start a seperate newsgroup
again long before I'll grow tired of debating the issue.

I do mind the "*I* will race as long as *I* am entertained"-comment. Having
a good race is a team effort, you are just as responsible for my racing
enjoyment as I am for yours. Having good drivers present in the race to pit
myself against, is part of my racing enjoyment.

Priority check, isle 4. <vbseg>

Jan.
=---

Larr

RASCAR: Richmond Race Reminder

by Larr » Mon, 08 Sep 2003 01:16:10

I don't understand the confusion.  The drivers meeting message for
Darlington clearly stated it was a one-time test.  Nothing more, nothing
less.

Larry



> says...



> > > So cheer up, think positive!! ;-))

> > I am positive Jan. I was positive we were going to give no yellows a
chance.
> > I appreciate I am in a minority in this respect and I always go with
what
> > the group decides.

> I was under the same impression. Does anyone know why yellows are on
> now, or was this a seemingly arbitrary decision made by the admins
> without the democratic approval of the group?  (Sorry guys, I
> couldn't resist this opportunity.)

> Since I'm not in RASCAR any longer (and hence, not on the mailing
> list), and since there's almost no message traffic on the forum
> anymore, I have to rely on stuff being posted here.

> Of course, it could be something as simple as a typo, or something
> done out of habit.

> > However, I do not expect to have my committment
> > My opinion is this: if we go back to
> > yellows on with no other mechanism for keeping the yellows down other
than
> > hoping for the best

> Hmmmm...  Sounds like what I had been saying all along.

> > My last intent was to 'piss people off' - I've
> > always thought of myself as a reasonable guy.

> Again, sounds like what I was saying. Be careful here, Neil.

> :)

Neil Charlto

RASCAR: Richmond Race Reminder

by Neil Charlto » Mon, 08 Sep 2003 02:10:00

"Jan Verschueren" <jan.no_spam.verschue...@pandora.be> wrote in message

news:pcn6b.4804$CI3.31776@phobos.telenet-ops.be...
> "Neil Charlton" wrote...
> > > <snip>

> > Not defeatist Jan - a pessimist is merely an optimist
> > with experience of life ;)

> A pessimistic view is not nescessarily a realistic view. There is no real
> reason to believe tonights race will feature an excessive amount of
yellows.
> It would unrealistic to expect no yellows (as in no yellows occuring).
Some
> things just can't be avoided.

[snip]
I actually don't mind a 'few yellows' - they add a strategic content which
is interesting. Yellows every 10 laps or less are not strategic nor are they
interesting.

> > > <snip>
> > No arguments here but experience has shown is isn't so
> > much a matter of keeping the mind on the job as basic
> > car control.

> Everybody in RASCAR has enough car control to avoid the avoidable, it's
all
> in the mind. It's all about discipline in preparation and on the track.

[snip]>
I totally agree with this. Unfortunately, it needs all present to have the
same attitude. Even a few with brains in neutral will bring about the
succession of yellows. Some find it almost inpossible to adopt that
mindset - how do you deal with that?

> I believe that raising awareness and raising group morale (more on that
> later) will benifit the races and that's why I challenge those who focus
on
> the negative.

Group morale is important - one reason why if there are a few yellows,
chatting a little is for the good of the group. However, it is not
leadership to simply keep chanting 'keep up morale' - morale depends to a
large extent on the quality of the racing and the character of the
participants. On the latter, I don't recall ever having anything but good
relationships with anyone in RASCAR - they're a great bunch. That only
leaves the quality of racing ......

> > > <snip>
> > I don't think any track sucks. If anything, I go better on
> > short tracks road courses - it's only the SS that bore me
> > to tears.

> Translation: "I lack the discipline to stay focussed at Super Speedways."
> <vwg>

The grin is noted ;) However, on SS I usually hang in with the lead draft
train and rarely ever have any incidents. It's not lacking discipline to
stay focussed it's that the challenge in doing so is minimal and therefore
less fun. This is obviously a personal perspective - others love SS and good
luck to them.

> > Fearing the worst does not imply I would put in less
> > offort or concentration. A more sensitive chap could
> > get annoyed at the mere suggestion ;)

> We might be getting into semantics here, but I consider it a logic
> impossibility to give a race your full attention if you decide in advance
it
> will have to meet certain criteria for it to keep your attention. I don't
> even mind if that point of view upsets you... I have to take the edge of
> that speed of yours in some way or another. ;-))

But of course I didn't say it would have to meet certain criteria to keep my
attention. If the race is not enjoyable, my attention doesn't wander - I owe
that to those I'm racing with. It does affect my motivation to participate
in future races but then that's my loss I guess.

> > > <snip>
[snip]
> > However, I do not expect to have my committment questioned
> > when I do voice my opinion.

> Yet you do seem to enter these races with two motives which cannot always
> co-exist: to do well in the race and to have fun. You can choose to battle
> for position extensively early in the race and have fun, but it will slow
> you down and deminish your chances of actually winning the race
(especially
> if you get into an accident). On the other hand, a couple of guys must
> finish 1, 2 and 3, even in a messy/boring race. It's up to you how to
juggle
> those motives as you compete.

You're predicating this on the assumption that fun just equates to battling
for position. Fun is also had by working a strategy - be that blasting out
an early lead or running slower to conserve tyres. I find all aspects of a
realistic race fun. Once a yellow-fest begins all strategy goes out of the
door and takes with it a large chunk of the fun. I am very happy to run with
yellows on - I do so in my other leagues and they are brilliant fun - but I
think we find ourselves in a position where we need to take concrete steps
to ensure a reasonable number of yellows as opposed to just hoping. This is
what John tried to and I applaud that effort.

> > My opinion is this: if we go back to yellows on with no
> > other mechanism for keeping the yellows down other than
> > hoping for the best

> It's not hoping for the best. Being positive and confident and instilling
> that in others does help.

> SAS soldiers are incredibly fit, undergo constant and advanced training
and
> are exceptionally well equipped, but the real reason they are better than
> regular troops is they have utter and unwavering belief in their abilities
/
> their commanders and their ability to sublimate anything and everything to
> the job in hand. A squaddie might think "Oh man... a field excercise.
> Setting and breaking up camp every day, eating bland personal rations, not
> getting myself clean properly, the rain, the mud, the heat/the cold, the
> insects....". An SAS trooper receives his instructions and then goes ahead
> and does it. It's a mindset... and a mindset that can be promoted.

???

> I am confident I can run in the race tonight and avoid the avoidable, I'm
> confident most of the others can too if they've got their heads screwed on
> rigth. I'm not entirely confident about that last bit, but I wasn't going
to
> let that show, if you understand what I mean.

> > I know that my Saturday night 'fun-factor' will be diminished.
> > I'm not basing this on pessimism just on a reasonably long
> > experience with RASCAR.

> ...reasonably long experience of focussing on the negatives in RASCAR,
> rather. <vwg>

Come on Jan. I raced all last year and all this season and other than during
'recent events' when have you ever heard negativity from me, either on the
track or off.

> I might have agreed with you before I started doing the reviews and really
> paying attention to people's driving, but I cannot agree now. It's not a
> matter of car control, but of self control. It's a matter of getting
people
> to avaluate their driving without feeling insulted. That can only be done
by
> pointing out the positive while mentioning the negative.

You may have a point but the outcome's the same. A lack of self discipline
to drive within one's own car control constraints has the same effect as not
having enough car control.

- Show quoted text -

> > My last intent was to 'piss people off' - I've always thought
> > of myself as a reasonable guy.

> I thought I made it clear you merely tipped the scales for me to make a
> public statement. I'm not pissed off. I'm a little annoyed, just like I
was
> when Eldred condemned the Bristol race to a yellow fest before it even
> started.

> > If my swimming against the mainstream opinion is getting on
> > people's nerves I'll withdraw.

> You can say "I'd like to see yellows of in RASCAR races because..." as
much
> as you like. People will be yelling for us to start a seperate newsgroup
> again long before I'll grow tired of debating the issue.

> I do mind the "*I* will race as long as *I* am entertained"-comment.
Having
> a good race is a team effort, you are just as responsible for my racing
> enjoyment as I am for yours. Having good drivers present in the race to
pit
> myself against, is part of my racing enjoyment.

 This is my free time Jan, of which I get precious little. I *do* wish to be
entertained. For that to happen I have to treat others with respect and
drive within my own limits which I usually do (although red mist has been
known in the last few laps ;) ). If having done that, the race is still not
enjoyable then it would border on the masochistic to keep doing it. The last
race was fun (for me - and I didn't do particularly well!). More
importantly, I think I know what made it fun.

> > In fact, I'll start with tonight.

> Priority check, isle 4. <vbseg>

Priority check is dead right Jan. I know a lot of people thrive on the
recent acrimonious events. I hated it. I really don't want to spend every
week arguing about the format of the next race. Equally, I don't want to
spend my Saturday nights behind a pace car. I'm damn sure others don't want
to listen to me banging on about stuff like this every week. I thought we
were ok from last week but I had obviously misinterpreted what was going on.
I'm not withdrawing tonight because I can't have my own way - it doesn't
work with me like that. It's just that I would rather go away quietly than
keep moaning. The alternative is to race tonight and then carry on with the
moaning about yellows next week. I don't want that so I'll STFU and not race

Regards

Neil Charlto

RASCAR: Richmond Race Reminder

by Neil Charlto » Mon, 08 Sep 2003 03:30:36

Not confused Larry. I was just hoping the test would lead to something. No
big deal.

Regards


> I don't understand the confusion.  The drivers meeting message for
> Darlington clearly stated it was a one-time test.  Nothing more, nothing
> less.

> Larry




> > says...



> > > > So cheer up, think positive!! ;-))

> > > I am positive Jan. I was positive we were going to give no yellows a
> chance.
> > > I appreciate I am in a minority in this respect and I always go with
> what
> > > the group decides.

> > I was under the same impression. Does anyone know why yellows are on
> > now, or was this a seemingly arbitrary decision made by the admins
> > without the democratic approval of the group?  (Sorry guys, I
> > couldn't resist this opportunity.)

> > Since I'm not in RASCAR any longer (and hence, not on the mailing
> > list), and since there's almost no message traffic on the forum
> > anymore, I have to rely on stuff being posted here.

> > Of course, it could be something as simple as a typo, or something
> > done out of habit.

> > > However, I do not expect to have my committment
> > > My opinion is this: if we go back to
> > > yellows on with no other mechanism for keeping the yellows down other
> than
> > > hoping for the best

> > Hmmmm...  Sounds like what I had been saying all along.

> > > My last intent was to 'piss people off' - I've
> > > always thought of myself as a reasonable guy.

> > Again, sounds like what I was saying. Be careful here, Neil.

> > :)

Eldre

RASCAR: Richmond Race Reminder

by Eldre » Mon, 08 Sep 2003 11:44:04



>I thought I made it clear you merely tipped the scales for me to make a
>public statement. I'm not pissed off. I'm a little annoyed, just like I was
>when Eldred condemned the Bristol race to a yellow fest before it even
>started.

Hey, don't bring ME back into this...<g>  
But since you did, I have YET to see a Bristol online race without a ton of
yellows.  Past occurences/experiences shape present perception.  One GPL league
I'm in ran 3 races last weekend at Watkins Glen on successive nights.  Every
one of those had a T1 pileup.   I've been in league races at Solitude - *every*
race(maybe 10-12 total) featured a T1 crash.  From my point of view, you can't
run a race at Solitude without a T1 wreck... :-)
I just don't get it - it doesn't seem that hard to ME, but better drivers than
I am can't seem to avoid crashing.  What's up with THAT?

Eldred
--
"A voice from the crowd:  Right, everyone out of my garden.  I've had
enough of this!"

Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
GPLRank -2.4
N2k3 rank ?

Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

Ruud Dingeman

RASCAR: Richmond Race Reminder

by Ruud Dingeman » Mon, 08 Sep 2003 13:32:38


> I just don't get it - it doesn't seem that hard to ME, but better drivers than
> I am can't seem to avoid crashing.  What's up with THAT?

When you're fast you're on the very edge and on the very edge, it's
"from ace to twit in a tenth of a second" Eldred, as Graham Hill said   ;)

Regards, Rudy
(GPLRank -7.8)

Jan Verschuere

RASCAR: Richmond Race Reminder

by Jan Verschuere » Mon, 08 Sep 2003 21:21:00

"Neil Charlton" wrote...
> > <snip>
> I actually don't mind a 'few yellows' - they add a strategic
> content which is interesting. Yellows every 10 laps or less
> are not strategic nor are they interesting.

It's an easy way to stay on the lead lap for a late push. <g>

> > <snip>
> I totally agree with this. Unfortunately, it needs all
> present to have the same attitude. Even a few with brains
> in neutral will bring about the succession of yellows.
> Some find it almost inpossible to adopt that mindset -
> how do you deal with that?

Well, herein lies the rub, obviously. There's only two ways of doing that.
One is to effectively punish those who have brainfade -not an option under
current circumstances. The other is to be "sickeningly positive" and just
wear people down into compliance. <g>

> > <snip>
> Group morale is important - one reason why if there are a
> few yellows, chatting a little is for the good of the group.
> However, it is not leadership to simply keep chanting 'keep
> up morale' - morale depends to a large extent on the quality
> of the racing and the character of the participants.

There's very little one can do on-track to improve the racing, so I'm
working the avenue that is available.

> On the latter, I don't recall ever having anything but good
> relationships with anyone in RASCAR - they're a great bunch.
> That only leaves the quality of racing ......

They are a great bunch *and* more than capable of having good races. In
fact, not having good races with drivers this good and this closesy matched
is inexcusable.

> > <snip>
> The grin is noted ;) However, on SS I usually hang in with
> the lead draft train and rarely ever have any incidents.
> It's not lacking discipline to stay focussed it's that the
> challenge in doing so is minimal and therefore less fun.
> This is obviously a personal perspective - others love SS
> and good luck to them.

The challenge is to stay focussed, the challenge (in open setup racing) is
to set up the car to handle in the couple of 1/10ths per lap you really need
it to. The challenge is to move up without getting hung out to dry. The
challenge is to get the other drivers to work with you.

I'll agree there's not much to the driving part, but the rest is chess at
185mph and that aspect makes it interesting.

> > <snip>
> But of course I didn't say it would have to meet certain
> criteria to keep my attention. If the race is not
> enjoyable, my attention doesn't wander - I owe that to
> those I'm racing with. It does affect my motivation to
> participate in future races but then that's my loss I
> guess.

Now this I can live with, but it's not what you originally wrote. It might
be what you originally intended, but not what you wrote. <g>

> > <snip>
> You're predicating this on the assumption that fun just
> equates to battling for position. Fun is also had by
> working a strategy - be that blasting out an early lead
> or running slower to conserve tyres. I find all aspects
> of a realistic race fun.

I would rather classify that as satisfaction and keep "fun" reserved for
sliding the car around and climbing all over the back of another car. "Fun"
is something you sublimate to the strategy, if you know what I mean.

> Once a yellow-fest begins all strategy goes out of the
> door and takes with it a large chunk of the fun.

Yeah, events can overtake a strategy and even make it backfire, but that is
just another aspect of the racing. With no yellows there's indeed less
chance of being forced to change strategy, but the side-effects are not
worth the this benefit, IMO.

> I am very happy to run with yellows on - I do so in my other
> leagues and they are brilliant fun - but I think we find
> ourselves in a position where we need to take concrete steps
> to ensure a reasonable number of yellows as opposed to just
> hoping. This is what John tried to and I applaud that effort.

I was not ready to go the repressive route but I went along with it as, if
applied consistenly, it does work. However, motivating people is more than
just hoping.

> > <snip> It's a mindset... and a mindset that can be
> > promoted.
> ???

It's very simple... if most believe there's going to be a lot of yellows,
that it's unavoidable there will a lot of yellows. Consciously or
subconsciously they'll go out at full tilt, knowing they're not going to run
out of tyre or they might tense up when in close proximity of others or
whatever. If you expect to have an accident, you will have one, that's how
runs of bad luck come about.

If, on the other hand, you can get people believing in their ability to the
extent there is no reason for them to expect there being a lot of yellows if
they just do what they do, there won't be a lot of yellows. Trust me, it
really does work.

> > <snip>
> Come on Jan. I raced all last year and all this season
> and other than during 'recent events' when have you
> ever heard negativity from me, either on the track or
> off.

Just exaggerating Neil. You're right, the general consensus was and is that
it has gone too far, but it's not something you can withdraw from and come
back to when it's better. Because if you do it's not going to get better.
Can't have good races without sensible drivers leading by example and you
can't attract sensible drivers to wreckfests... catch 22.

> > <snip>
> You may have a point but the outcome's the same. A lack of
> self discipline to drive within one's own car control
> constraints has the same effect as not having enough car
> control.

Bull. Not enough car control needs time to put in the virtual miles and
might even require hardware change if the problem is framerate related. A
discipline problem can be rectified over night without as much as turning a
wheel. Like Keith Code says, thinking about it just costs the time for you
to do it, track time costs money.

Perhaps people fail to realise simracing is only partially "a gift". The
rest is an interest in the sport and a learned skill. It does require
analysis of what you're doing and it does take conscious effort to improve.
As with any "game" it does require one to "take it seriously" to ascend past
a certain level.

> This is my free time Jan, of which I get precious little.
> I *do* wish to be entertained. For that to happen I have
> to treat others with respect and drive within my own
> limits which I usually do (although red mist has been
> known in the last few laps ;) ). If having done that, the
> race is still not enjoyable then it would border on the
> masochistic to keep doing it.

It does, no question. It's a matter of how bad one wants to race. "How bad
have you got it?" <vbg>

> The last race was fun (for me - and I didn't do particularly
> well!). More importantly, I think I know what made it fun.

The last two races weren't a lot of fun for me, for different reasons,
eventhough I got a fairly good result in both. If yellows were to be turned
off for the remaining races they all wouldn't be a lot of fun, so I'll take
my chances, thanks.

> > <snip>
> Priority check is dead right Jan. I know a lot of people
> thrive on the recent acrimonious events. I hated it.

I don't think anyone came out of that feeling particularly good. I would
rather the current situation had not produced itself as vetoing the
introduction of enforced rules takes away a lot of the pressure for people
to behave.

> I really don't want to spend every week arguing about the
> format of the next race. Equally, I don't want to spend my
> Saturday nights behind a pace car. I'm damn sure others
> don't want to listen to me banging on about stuff like
> this every week.

We can't decide the yellows/no yellows thing on a per race basis. We need
analyse what happened at Darlington, discuss and reach a consensus. I
suggest we shelve the issue until such time we're able to do that.

> I thought we were ok from last week but I had obviously
> misinterpreted what was going on. I'm not withdrawing
> tonight because I can't have my own way - it doesn't work
> with me like that. It's just that I would rather go away
> quietly than keep moaning. The alternative is to race
> tonight and then carry on with the moaning about yellows
> next week. I don't want that so I'll STFU and not race

I'm glad to see the desire to burn some rubber won out and I'm sorry the
race did turn out to be questionable. Very unfortunate for us to get
together as well, sorry about that.

Yellows do seem to be on a haired trigger there. Don't really see why some
of 'm were thrown. On the other hand there were a couple of instances where
I could see the accident coming a mile away. I need to find out why those
involved didn't and arm everyone with that knowledge. If I can get through
in this manner it will improve the racing over time. Whether you want to be
part of that process or not is up to you.

What's up with the pacecar at this track, BTW? -Even if the leader had
nearly a lap to run in order to take the yellow it still didn't manage to
make it out to the backstretch in time to catch him. Is this something that
can be edited with the Sandbox editor?

Jan.
=---

Jan Verschuere

RASCAR: Richmond Race Reminder

by Jan Verschuere » Mon, 08 Sep 2003 22:11:57

<vwg>

Yes, but you do realise that's a viscious circle which needs to be broken?

That's simply pittyfull.

That's strange as T2 is by far the more dangerous turn at the start. Most of
the events I've been in got through both, but if it went wrong it was at T2.

You're right, it's not that hard. It's fairly easy in fact. Also I'd
hestitate to call drivers who routinely get involved in this kind of
incident better than you. Faster on their own, perhaps more confident, but
certainly not better.

Jan.
=---

Jan Verschuere

RASCAR: Richmond Race Reminder

by Jan Verschuere » Mon, 08 Sep 2003 22:11:57

Nice quote, but that has got to be the lamest excuse for T1 accidents I've
ever heard. When it's crunch time, you're dicing for position, both drivers
are maxed out and it gets away or goes pearshaped, then that may be
excusable. Missing one's braking or running out of room in T1 simply isn't.

Being fast means f*** all if you can't make it through the 1st turn in one
piece.

Jan.
=---

John Simmon

RASCAR: Richmond Race Reminder

by John Simmon » Mon, 08 Sep 2003 22:34:29



Looks to me like you guys are arguing the same point from a different
angle. I've always said people need to practice more in order to gain
some self-confidence and to *know* how the car is going to react in
different situations. Given that RASCAR uses the <fast> setups
(widely recognized as being almost completely unsuitable for the
majority of drivers out there), this is the most important aspect of
racing.  Not having to come up with your own setup relieves you of a
LOT of the hassle of preparing for a race because all you have to do
is get used to the one everyone else will be using.

If you don't know that the setup pushes on exit after 5, 10, 0r 15
laps, then you haven't practiced enough.  If you don't know what the
car is going to do at the end of a fuel run, you haven't practised
enough. If you don't know what the car is going to do if you blow a
turn entry and drift way high, you haven't practised enough.  

If, by the time the race session starts, you haven't decided whether
or not you can hold it together for the whole race, you should quit
the race, and start practicing for the next event.

Yellows can be an important part of race strategy, and most of the
online leagues that exist today run with them turned on.  There's
absolutely no reason to expect an online race to go caution-free, but
at the same time, you shouldn't have to worry about whether or not
50% of the laps will be run under the yellow flag.

Turning cautions off doesn't teach anyone anything. You have to be
willing to call people out for doing stupid shit, and the people you
call out should be willing to admit when they screwed up, and then be
able to learn from it.


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.