rec.autos.simulators

have LCD's improved over the last couple years,

groups.google.com will show you the many discussions on this matter.
--

Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevant text.
Check groups.google.com before asking a question.

Andrew :

        And what is man suppose to write in groups.google.com? LCD? Racing?
Simulators? And, is he supposed to read all those discussions, and all those
posts (who knows how many of them), to see which one is relevant, or which
one is up to date, or things like that.
        You supposedly tried to show the man how his post was sensless.
Well, I think your smart-assing was completly sensless. You wrote so many
words, and didn't say anything. Instead you could write 'yes' or 'no', and
that would mean (at least) something. Save the man a lot of work. But, this
is not your stile. Your idea is that nothing on usenet mustn't be said
twice. And this idea is stupid like hell. And you dared to present this
stupid idea for all to see. -- Mario

On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 07:19:00 +0100, "Mario Petrinovich"

What about saving everyone reading this group a lot of work and
reading the same discussion as took place a few weeks back. The
information hasn't changed since then.
--

Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevant text.
Check groups.google.com before asking a question.

Mario Petrinovich :

        And, while we are at that, I must say a few words about your
signature. You don't have to spread the word about google around. Maybe you
will be surprised, but EVERYBODY knows about google. And everybody knows
what it is for (exactly). If they chose not to use it, they had a reason.
        Instead of this you should write THE most important thing about
Usenet (which miteriously slipped from you). Usenet is made to allow us to
HELP each other. If you are not ready to help other people, stay away from
Usenet. Or you will just vaste other people's time. Like it was compleate
vaste of time, for me, to read so many words you wrote in your post.
 -- Mario

On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 07:44:08 +0100, "Mario Petrinovich"

Everyone knows about Google, but the majority of Usenet posters still
don't know or don't bother to use the Usenet archive, which wastes a
lot of peoples time needlessly.

I have helped hundreds of people, but for FAQ's making people aware of
using google helps everyone a lot more.

I have provided the OP with everything he needs to answer his question
thoroughly, whereas you have done precisely nothing to help him.
--

Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevant text.
Check groups.google.com before asking a question.

Andrew :

        If it is so easy to find this discussion, you would write a lot less
words pointing man to this discussion (expalining how exactly to find it,
pointing to the most relevant posts in discussion, all posts aren't equally
relevant). Or, was it really so hard to write just one word ('yes' or 'no').
And, even if you add a short explaination, it wouldn't hurt your fingers.
 -- Mario

Andrew :

        Oh, now I figured out where you are making mistake. You know,
Andrew, you don't have to read all posts on Usenet. It is enough to read
only threads that are important to you. And that goes for everybody. Whoever
isn't interested in the subject of the thread, he can simply skip it. Easy
like that. Not everybody will read this thread. Only people who are
interested in this information, and only people who are kind enough to
provide this information, will have anything to do with this thread.
 -- Mario

Andrew :

        Nobody is wasting your time, expect you.

        Are you suggesting that man should read FAQ of usenet, as well. And
FAQ of this group? And what you are suggesting further to read? And what
would be the benefit? Why don't you simply write man the answer?

        Well, I don't know the answer. And it is easier for me to find that
answer here, even if I talk to you for hours. Because, only now and here I
will get relevant information. I don't know what to type in Google (was
there talking about TFT instead of LCD, few weeks before?). And if somebody
write a few words, it will be just what I want. Plus, I want to finish with
you. Because of you, and people like you, a lot of people in need for
information were sent on some tricky, tiresome, and uncertain, long trip to
search for information, only because some smart-ass people were figured out
how to persuade other people to don't deliver the information to the one who
need it. -- Mario

Andrew you really are a star at antagonising people,what on earth is your
reason for being such a repulsive person.
The google group search is a perfect way to find all your crap,please seek
help for your abrasive,totally out of order attitude,in your one man crusade
for the 'Perfect World by Andrew'

Either that or just keep your nose out of alot more and leave well meaning
folk alone you bully.

AD

I gave one very useful piece of advice to the OP. All the abuse is
coming from you and the other guy, and neither of you have done
anything to help the OP. If others in this group want to repeat the
same discussion again, they are free to do so.
--

Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevant text.
Check groups.google.com before asking a question.

As if everyone knows that this discussion took place a few weeks ago. I'd
like to know the answer as well. Please look it up for us all to see.
Thanks. :-)

Despite the top posting, seeing as you asked nicely, here is one
recent discussion:

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&threadm=684ec45a.0...
--

Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevant text.
Check groups.google.com before asking a question.

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&threadm=684ec45a.0...
33.5e8d956a%40posting.google.com&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dlcd%2Bgroup:rec.a
utos.simulators%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26as_qdr%3Dm3%26selm%3D684ec4
5a.0404190633.5e8d956a%2540posting.google.com%26rnum%3D1

Look at all the bandwidth we'd have saved if you just posted that in the
first place ;)

--

Ian P
<email invalid due to spammers>

Just look for low response times>25ms or better...