rec.autos.simulators

by **Andi Col** » Thu, 17 Jun 2004 04:44:15

But you could have been helpful and given the guy an answer!! Instead you go
on and on about how your ideal world would go.

Andi.

--
Remove only one zero to reply.

> On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:09:50 GMT, "Tony Rickard"

> >The OP got a ticking off from Andrew for asking the question, hence my
> >response to Andi

> I didn't give him a ticking off, I just made a useful suggestion. It
> seems giving people useful advice is a major crime around here,
> *sigh*.
> --

> Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
> please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevant text.
> Check groups.google.com before asking a question.

by **Andi Col** » Thu, 17 Jun 2004 04:46:14

Repost what, if you're talking LCD's they need to be updated when ever
possible so reposts are important, if you're talking about Andrew, I'm
entitled to tell other people not to wory about his endless nagging about
etiquette.

Andi.

--
Remove only one zero to reply.

> > The guy Andrew is a burk, he's more interested in his own view of
> > correctness than helping out others who ask perfectly acceptable
> questions.

> This has been discussed in a previous thread. Please do not repost it.
Make
> the world a better place...

by **Tony Rickar** » Thu, 17 Jun 2004 05:43:21

> > This has been discussed in a previous thread. Please do not repost it.
> > Make the world a better place...
> Repost what, if you're talking LCD's they need to be updated when ever
> possible so reposts are important, if you're talking about Andrew, I'm
> entitled to tell other people not to wory about his endless nagging about
> etiquette.

Clearly my sarcasm was too subtle :)

It was a gentle stab at Andrew's initial reaction and his signature.

It seemed funny at the time, but now I just feel a bit of a tit... <G>

by **double** » Thu, 17 Jun 2004 10:40:22

Samsung 172x? 12ms response time is one of the lowest right now if I'm not
mistaken.

by **Andi Col** » Thu, 17 Jun 2004 16:28:34

Probably my fault, getting too carried away with Andrews attitude, sorry.

Andi.

--
Remove only one zero to reply.

> > > This has been discussed in a previous thread. Please do not repost it.
> > > Make the world a better place...

> > Repost what, if you're talking LCD's they need to be updated when ever
> > possible so reposts are important, if you're talking about Andrew, I'm
> > entitled to tell other people not to wory about his endless nagging
about
> > etiquette.

> Clearly my sarcasm was too subtle :)

> It was a gentle stab at Andrew's initial reaction and his signature.

> It seemed funny at the time, but now I just feel a bit of a tit... <G>

by **Andi Col** » Thu, 17 Jun 2004 16:35:31

Only the 172X has 12ms, wow that's fast. The 173 is listed as 25ms so be
careful with your supplier.

Another thing to note about resolution, when you get to the larger screens
with 1600*1200 I've read a couple of tech notes saying that DVI will
struggle at that amount of data and soem errors wil occur.

Andi.

--
Remove only one zero to reply.

by **Klin** » Thu, 17 Jun 2004 20:37:09

"doubleu" wrote in ...

Check the somewhat mixed review at
http://www.anandtech.com/showdoc.html?i=2072
This is one of those panels that achieves faster response time by limiting
the number of colours it can show, then using dithering to simulate the
rest, as I mentioned in my previous post.

...Klinn

by **Andi Col** » Fri, 18 Jun 2004 02:33:04

Hmm interesting.

--
Remove only one zero to reply.

rec.autos.simulators

OT: Best LCD for Racing

OT: Best LCD for Racing

OT: Best LCD for Racing

OT: Best LCD for Racing

OT: Best LCD for Racing

OT: Best LCD for Racing

OT: Best LCD for Racing

OT: Best LCD for Racing

OT: Best LCD for Racing