rec.autos.simulators

by . » Tue, 01 Jan 2002 05:29:57

How good is the physics of F355 compared to GPL?

by **Damien Smit** » Wed, 02 Jan 2002 18:17:22

The physics in Ferrari 355 aren't bad, especially for a Dreamcast. There
are some flaws, but I guess every sim has those. I think GPL is a little
more accurate physics-wise, but F355 is easier to pick up and play and it's
certainly more realistic than, say, Gran Turismo 3, but it's possible that
F12001 on PS2 is the most realistic console racer (from what I've heard)

by . » Thu, 03 Jan 2002 01:31:59

F1 2001 is not even close to F355 in terms of physics. I know because I
returned the PS2 because of the F1 2001 disappointment.

by **Damien Smit** » Thu, 03 Jan 2002 09:06:08

Yeah? I'm just going by the PC version of F1 2001 which I think IS better
than F355 in the realism department (as long as you've got a GeForce 3 or
ATI 8500) though again, it has its flaws as well. Someone in here said
something about a sequel to F355 coming out on PC soon - now that WILL be
awesome.

by . » Thu, 03 Jan 2002 19:41:53

You mean by Sega?

by **Damien Smit** » Fri, 04 Jan 2002 13:10:21

Yup, the now consoleless Sega Software

rec.autos.simulators

Physics: GPL vs F355?

Physics: GPL vs F355?

Physics: GPL vs F355?

Physics: GPL vs F355?

Physics: GPL vs F355?

Physics: GPL vs F355?

Physics: GPL vs F355?