I'm trying to draw a comparison somehow. Let's say that your son has always
wanted to go to the Daytona 500. He's been with you to a number of other
races but this one you've never been able to see together. You are working
on a business deal with a large firm and your boss gives you tickets to the
race - with the stipulation that you take someone from the firm you are
dealing with.
Do you go?
--David Cook
> In a way, I guess there is two Papy's - the one that we were all
> introduced to with a little jewel called Indy 500, and is still there
> to some point doing what they do best - then there's the one that
> answers to a higher power know as SIERRA.
> The deal with the Daytona track tho' I think is more ISC's/Daytona
> Speedway's call and not Sierra/Papyrus' - like an artist that paints a
> commissioned picture; the customer does what they want with it....
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2000 19:22:47 -0500, "David L. Cook"
> >It's funny how I can have two such different opinions about the same
> >company. Here's how it is in my mind - on the one hand there is David
> >Kaemmer and his crew, probably wrapping up Nascar 4. Although the
process
> >for creating such a masterpiece is painstakingly slow, the result will
speak
> >for itself.
> >Then there is the N3 gang. Somehow they circumvented the release of the
> >real N3. It's beyond me that they would even be working on two versions
of
> >a Nascar sim at the same time. This group releases the "holy grail of
> >Nascar race tracks" (Daytona Motor Speedway) to 100,000+ people who will
> >probably throw it in the trash (fans at the race), then tells us we can't
> >have it. They even go so far as to delete all posts on their precious
> >little forums from anyone even discussing it.
> >2 Papy's IMHO. One rocks, the other sucks.
> >--David Cook
