rec.autos.simulators

New frigging Mellinium

skott

New frigging Mellinium

by skott » Tue, 04 Jan 2000 04:00:00

Here's one for ya's:

If B.C was before Christ and A.D. is after his death, what did they
call it when he was alive? :)

Daxe Rexfor

New frigging Mellinium

by Daxe Rexfor » Tue, 04 Jan 2000 04:00:00


>Here's one for ya's:

>If B.C was before Christ and A.D. is after his death, what did they
>call it when he was alive? :)

A.D. stands for "Anno Domini", Latin for 'Year of Our Lord'.

daxe

  -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
   http://www.newsfeeds.com       The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers ==-----

Tom Pendergas

New frigging Mellinium

by Tom Pendergas » Tue, 04 Jan 2000 04:00:00



> >Here's one for ya's:

> >If B.C was before Christ and A.D. is after his death, what did they
> >call it when he was alive? :)

> A.D. stands for "Anno Domini", Latin for 'Year of Our Lord'.

So... you're saying that the first "year of our Lord" was called
(either at the time it was happening or at anytime thereafter in
history) "year zero"?

- TP
(.sig file on the transporter heading for the wind tunnel)

Matthew Birger Knutse

New frigging Mellinium

by Matthew Birger Knutse » Tue, 04 Jan 2000 04:00:00

skotty skrev i meldingen ...

M.C - meanwhile Christ.

mk

Daxe Rexfor

New frigging Mellinium

by Daxe Rexfor » Tue, 04 Jan 2000 04:00:00




>> >Here's one for ya's:

>> >If B.C was before Christ and A.D. is after his death, what did they
>> >call it when he was alive? :)

>> A.D. stands for "Anno Domini", Latin for 'Year of Our Lord'.

>So... you're saying that the first "year of our Lord" was called
>(either at the time it was happening or at anytime thereafter in
>history) "year zero"?

No, I was correcting this person's mistaken assumption that A.D. stood for
after death.  I believe that the year of our lord stuff came about somewhere
in the 600s or 700s when the creator of the gregorian calendar backdated
(through research and assumptions, etc) to the supposed birth year of
christ.  I don;t know what system they were using at that time to ennumerate
years, but I don't think in the year we think of as "1A.D." people were
calling the previous year "1B.C."  christ (according to the assorted works
of fantasy that christians adhere to) wasn't important enough when he was
born (or even for quite a while afterwards) to warrant people immediately
dropping their current system and sudden counting everything in relation to
his existence.

I honestly couldn't care less when the new or next millenium starts or ends
or whatever.  It's just another year.  People are e***d about it because
the year now starts with 2 instead of 1 and that's really the whole of it.
The only people I heard yelling about the new "millenium" was the media.
All the real world people I know just called it 2000 or the year 2000.  They
aren't e***d because some calendar or other declares it is the second 1000
years after the alleged birth of christ or some other calendar says it's
not.  They don't care about that.  All they care about is that they have a
significantly different year to write on their checks or attached to their
new car or to refer to in relation to their graduation from college or high
school or as the birth year of their baby.  People are e***d because it's
2000, not because it's the millenium (or not).

Whatever.

daxe

  -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
   http://www.racesimcentral.net/       The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers ==-----

Steve Ferguso

New frigging Mellinium

by Steve Ferguso » Tue, 04 Jan 2000 04:00:00

: Joe, it's based on the fact that we (the vast bulk of the so-called
: "western world") use the Gregorian calendar.  We count a decade as being
: ten years, the first year is year 1 (not year 0) and the last year in the
: decade is year 10 (not year 0).

Bzzzt.  Wrong.  The '90s ended on 31/12/1999.  The '80s ended
31/12/1989.  etc.  

: Therefore a century is from Year 1 to Year 100 and a millennium is from
: Year 1 to Year 1000.

: To conclude, the 20th. century ends at midnight Year 2000 and the 21st.
: century starts in 2001.

Wrong again.  There is already a good post with a link to an explanation
of the Common Era Calendar.  And indeed, these calendars are a product of
society's, and history's perception, therefore it is equally valid to
consider the millenium change as the day that most people agree it
changes.  Not when a pedantic number cruncher says it ends.

Stephen


:>
:> >The new millenium isn't until 2001.
:>
:> Not. It's been 1000 years since the year 1000, that's a Millenium. If
:> you want to get really technical about it, most scholars agree that
:> Jesus was born in 4-5 BC, so the "millenium" was four years ago.
:>
:> Joe McGinn
:> _________________________
:> GA-Sports Writer
:> http://www.ga-sports.com/

:   -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
:    http://www.newsfeeds.com       The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
: ------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers ==-----

Steve Ferguso

New frigging Mellinium

by Steve Ferguso » Tue, 04 Jan 2000 04:00:00

: That's not "counting", that's the digits available for your use.

: Open up a dozen of eggs and count them.  The digit "0" is available
: for use (you'll use it later, when you get to "ten"), but you don't
: call the first egg "zero", you count it as "one", and unless you're
: a total dolt, you'll end up at 12.

I opened my egg container and started counting.  Unfortunately it was
empty.  I ended up counting "zero" eggs.

Stephen

Steve Ferguso

New frigging Mellinium

by Steve Ferguso » Tue, 04 Jan 2000 04:00:00

: Are you calling *me* a stubborn idiot?
: So how do YOU count the decade of the 90's?  With decades, people count from
: "0".  I.E. 1990 - 1999.  For the millenium, people count from "1", because
: there was no year zero.  1901-2000, and the next millenium starts with 2001.
: Therefore, there are two different counting methods, which would seem to
: conflict with each other.  Simple.  No need to get hostile.

When did we change to a hundred year millenium?  Is this to give us more
opportunities for gala New Year's festivities?  Or is it so*** Clark
gets one more kick at the can?

Stephen

Mark Seer

New frigging Mellinium

by Mark Seer » Tue, 04 Jan 2000 04:00:00

FYI Dave

Use capitalisation in Christ. It's a name.

Apostrophe in Don't. Not a semi-colon.

Only one "n" in enumerate

You call it tomato and I'll call it tomato hehe.

MS

Chuck Kandle

New frigging Mellinium

by Chuck Kandle » Tue, 04 Jan 2000 04:00:00


> FYI Dave

> Use capitalisation in Christ. It's a name.
> > christ.

> Apostrophe in Don't. Not a semi-colon.
> > I don;t know what system they were using at that time to

> Only one "n" in enumerate
> >ennumerate

> You call it tomato and I'll call it tomato hehe.

> MS

LMAO!!!!  Aren't paybacks great?  BTW-it's capitalization.

--
//Chuck Kandler  #70
//ChuckK or KS70 on Won.net
//K&S Racing
//http://www.fortunecity.com/silverstone/thepits/195
//The box said "Windows 0x5f or better", so I installed LINUX!

Mark Seer

New frigging Mellinium

by Mark Seer » Tue, 04 Jan 2000 04:00:00

Cheers Chuck. <G>

Sure I'm not perfect with my grammar and spelling but I do remember one
quote from the bible.

He without sin cast the first stone <BWG>

MS

BTW. I'm an airframe engineer not an Oxford litarary Don !



> > FYI Dave

> > Use capitalisation in Christ. It's a name.
> > > christ.

> > Apostrophe in Don't. Not a semi-colon.
> > > I don;t know what system they were using at that time to

> > Only one "n" in enumerate
> > >ennumerate

> > You call it tomato and I'll call it tomato hehe.

> > MS

> LMAO!!!!  Aren't paybacks great?  BTW-it's capitalization.

> --
> file://Chuck Kandler  #70
> file://ChuckK or KS70 on Won.net
> file://K&S Racing
> file://http://www.fortunecity.com/silverstone/thepits/195
> file://The box said "Windows 0x5f or better", so I installed LINUX!

Tom Pendergas

New frigging Mellinium

by Tom Pendergas » Tue, 04 Jan 2000 04:00:00



> : That's not "counting", that's the digits available for your use.

> : Open up a dozen of eggs and count them.  The digit "0" is available
> : for use (you'll use it later, when you get to "ten"), but you don't
> : call the first egg "zero", you count it as "one", and unless you're
> : a total dolt, you'll end up at 12.

> I opened my egg container and started counting.  Unfortunately it was
> empty.  I ended up counting "zero" eggs.

Which isn't surprising, as you obviously have a big problem with
comprehension ("a dozen of eggs", as I said, not "my egg container"
as you so stupidly state.)  If you counted "zero", then you have a
much bigger problem than being a roaring, flaming ***.

--
- TP
(.sig file on the transporter heading for the wind tunnel)

Steve Ferguso

New frigging Mellinium

by Steve Ferguso » Tue, 04 Jan 2000 04:00:00

:>

:>
:> : That's not "counting", that's the digits available for your use.
:>
:> : Open up a dozen of eggs and count them.  The digit "0" is available
:> : for use (you'll use it later, when you get to "ten"), but you don't
:> : call the first egg "zero", you count it as "one", and unless you're
:> : a total dolt, you'll end up at 12.
:>
:> I opened my egg container and started counting.  Unfortunately it was
:> empty.  I ended up counting "zero" eggs.

: Which isn't surprising, as you obviously have a big problem with
: comprehension ("a dozen of eggs", as I said, not "my egg container"
: as you so stupidly state.)  If you counted "zero", then you have a
: much bigger problem than being a roaring, flaming ***.

Lighten up.  It was simply meant as humour.  How you could see this as a
personal attack is beyond me.

Stephen

Daxe Rexfor

New frigging Mellinium

by Daxe Rexfor » Tue, 04 Jan 2000 04:00:00


>FYI Dave

FYI Mork, my name's not Dave.

I use lower case delberately to***off christians.  It's funny to watch
them get all bent out of shape when someone doesn't buy into their silly
fairy tale.

That's a typo.  I had a keyboard for a long time that had the apostrophe
where the semi-colon is now and since I don't type properly I keep hitting
it when I'm going for the apostrophe.  I usually go through and change them
all afterwards since I hit the right key about 5% of the time.  I guess I
missed that correction, thank you for noticing. BTW, you don't have to
capitalize a word at the end of a sentence.

I'll remember that, now.  Thanks.

But the important thing is that we can both spell it better than Dan Quayle.

~daxe

  -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
   http://www.racesimcentral.net/       The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers ==-----

Daxe Rexfor

New frigging Mellinium

by Daxe Rexfor » Tue, 04 Jan 2000 04:00:00


>Cheers Chuck. <G>

>Sure I'm not perfect with my grammar and spelling but I do remember one
>quote from the bible.

You forgot the comma after Sure.

Isn't that, "Let he who is without sin cast  the first stone"?

You forgot the comma after literary, too.

~daxe

  -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
   http://www.newsfeeds.com       The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers ==-----


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.