rec.autos.simulators

UK PC Gamer gave GP3 game 95 % - do you agree?

AM

UK PC Gamer gave GP3 game 95 % - do you agree?

by AM » Sun, 30 Jul 2000 04:00:00

Time for a heated debate.
fatClyd

UK PC Gamer gave GP3 game 95 % - do you agree?

by fatClyd » Sun, 30 Jul 2000 04:00:00

How can you argue with such an un-biased review as that .NOT !
So the missing 5% is for the:
1)***Graphics
2)***sound
3)Controller Setup bugs
4)Physics are strange
5)Replays of 20 seconds, max. etc..........
The 95% must be for something i've missed.
Greg Cisk

UK PC Gamer gave GP3 game 95 % - do you agree?

by Greg Cisk » Sun, 30 Jul 2000 04:00:00


Under the table payment to keep the *** business alive?

--


PcMa

UK PC Gamer gave GP3 game 95 % - do you agree?

by PcMa » Sun, 30 Jul 2000 04:00:00

Or Microprose payed for a big ad. inside the magazine and wanted a review
with over 90% of the
game ! Remember: Everybody has a price ! hehe




> > How can you argue with such an un-biased review as that .NOT !
> > So the missing 5% is for the:
> > 1)***Graphics
> > 2)***sound
> > 3)Controller Setup bugs
> > 4)Physics are strange
> > 5)Replays of 20 seconds, max. etc..........
> > The 95% must be for something i've missed.

> Under the table payment to keep the *** business alive?

> --



Peter Nilsso

UK PC Gamer gave GP3 game 95 % - do you agree?

by Peter Nilsso » Sun, 30 Jul 2000 04:00:00

On Sat, 29 Jul 2000 13:44:25 +0100, "AM"


>Time for a heated debate.

GPL vs GP3

GPL = A multitude of beautiful noises dissipating from those 8, 12 or
16 cylinders mixed with the sounds from the cars around you.
GP3 = A buzzsaw. One buzzsaw.

GPL = I trust in God and my skills to stay on the road
GP3 = I need downforce and fat tires to stay on the road

GPL = I think F1 drivers did it "back then" because it was fun and a
challenge. I think F1 drivers now do it for glamour, money and girls
GP3 = what's "back then"?

GPL = AI drivers are a challenge and with individual skills
GP3 = AI drivers are a nuisance

GPL = different cars have different top speeds, engine temperaments,
sounds, gearboxes, suspensions, dashboards and colors and more
GP3 = different cars have different colors

GPL = The ability to use any steering wheel know to mankind with full
three axis support and fully twaekable FF support.
GP3 = "Huh, should I buy two joysticks now or what"?

GPL = hair on the chest (Ms. Hine et al excluded)
GP3 = translucent complexion and weak limbs

Need I go on? Don't even get me started on graphics.

/petern
/dons flameproof undies

A Thoma

UK PC Gamer gave GP3 game 95 % - do you agree?

by A Thoma » Sun, 30 Jul 2000 04:00:00

I don't trust British magazine reviews any longer . Not after PC Format
praised Le Mans 24hr to the skies and that was probably far worse that GP3 .
It's better to watch the reviews of new games here on RAS . Some will like a
game , some will hate it , just make a judgement based on the balance
for/against . If a game is groundbreaking like GPL then you can bet that the
reviews will reflect that .

Andrew


Sjoerd de Roes

UK PC Gamer gave GP3 game 95 % - do you agree?

by Sjoerd de Roes » Sun, 30 Jul 2000 04:00:00


>On Sat, 29 Jul 2000 13:44:25 +0100, "AM"

>>Time for a heated debate.

>GPL vs GP3

>GPL = A multitude of beautiful noises dissipating from those 8, 12 or
>16 cylinders mixed with the sounds from the cars around you.
>GP3 = A buzzsaw. One buzzsaw.

>GPL = I trust in God and my skills to stay on the road
>GP3 = I need downforce and fat tires to stay on the road

>GPL = I think F1 drivers did it "back then" because it was fun and a
>challenge. I think F1 drivers now do it for glamour, money and girls
>GP3 = what's "back then"?

>GPL = AI drivers are a challenge and with individual skills
>GP3 = AI drivers are a nuisance

>GPL = different cars have different top speeds, engine temperaments,
>sounds, gearboxes, suspensions, dashboards and colors and more
>GP3 = different cars have different colors

>GPL = The ability to use any steering wheel know to mankind with full
>three axis support and fully twaekable FF support.
>GP3 = "Huh, should I buy two joysticks now or what"?

>GPL = hair on the chest (Ms. Hine et al excluded)
>GP3 = translucent complexion and weak limbs

>Need I go on? Don't even get me started on graphics.

>/petern
>/dons flameproof undies

Yeah. And GPL sold 20 copies.
GP3 will sell a lot more. That's because it isn't a real sim. It's a game.
It doesn't matter what they say at microprose.

Sjoerd

Ace

UK PC Gamer gave GP3 game 95 % - do you agree?

by Ace » Sun, 30 Jul 2000 04:00:00

You could tell months ago they were gonna***in their pants over GP3, so
this is no suprise at all.
--
-Ace-
(GPLRank +0.29)


Jan Verschuere

UK PC Gamer gave GP3 game 95 % - do you agree?

by Jan Verschuere » Sun, 30 Jul 2000 04:00:00

Not in the slightest... they're going to receive and "Uncensored" entry by
yours truly.

Thanks for the heads up.... not at risk of popping a vain in public now. ;-)

Jan.
=---

Mike Blackmor

UK PC Gamer gave GP3 game 95 % - do you agree?

by Mike Blackmor » Sun, 30 Jul 2000 04:00:00

GPL = It's a beautiful day mister just like the other 728
GP3 = Theres 6 Laps left it's wet through Eau Rouge It's dry at
Blachemont It's starting to rain again and I'm on dry's (Oh %$^*)

Regards Mike

On Sat, 29 Jul 2000 16:59:12 GMT, Peter Nilsson


>On Sat, 29 Jul 2000 13:44:25 +0100, "AM"

>>Time for a heated debate.

>GPL vs GP3

>GPL = A multitude of beautiful noises dissipating from those 8, 12 or
>16 cylinders mixed with the sounds from the cars around you.
>GP3 = A buzzsaw. One buzzsaw.

>GPL = I trust in God and my skills to stay on the road
>GP3 = I need downforce and fat tires to stay on the road

>GPL = I think F1 drivers did it "back then" because it was fun and a
>challenge. I think F1 drivers now do it for glamour, money and girls
>GP3 = what's "back then"?

>GPL = AI drivers are a challenge and with individual skills
>GP3 = AI drivers are a nuisance

>GPL = different cars have different top speeds, engine temperaments,
>sounds, gearboxes, suspensions, dashboards and colors and more
>GP3 = different cars have different colors

>GPL = The ability to use any steering wheel know to mankind with full
>three axis support and fully twaekable FF support.
>GP3 = "Huh, should I buy two joysticks now or what"?

>GPL = hair on the chest (Ms. Hine et al excluded)
>GP3 = translucent complexion and weak limbs

>Need I go on? Don't even get me started on graphics.

>/petern
>/dons flameproof undies

Simon Brow

UK PC Gamer gave GP3 game 95 % - do you agree?

by Simon Brow » Sun, 30 Jul 2000 04:00:00

Congratulations in finding the one area where GP3 is superior.


> GPL = It's a beautiful day mister just like the other 728
> GP3 = Theres 6 Laps left it's wet through Eau Rouge It's dry at
> Blachemont It's starting to rain again and I'm on dry's (Oh %$^*)

> Regards Mike

> On Sat, 29 Jul 2000 16:59:12 GMT, Peter Nilsson

> >On Sat, 29 Jul 2000 13:44:25 +0100, "AM"

> >>Time for a heated debate.

> >GPL vs GP3

> >GPL = A multitude of beautiful noises dissipating from those 8, 12 or
> >16 cylinders mixed with the sounds from the cars around you.
> >GP3 = A buzzsaw. One buzzsaw.

> >GPL = I trust in God and my skills to stay on the road
> >GP3 = I need downforce and fat tires to stay on the road

> >GPL = I think F1 drivers did it "back then" because it was fun and a
> >challenge. I think F1 drivers now do it for glamour, money and girls
> >GP3 = what's "back then"?

> >GPL = AI drivers are a challenge and with individual skills
> >GP3 = AI drivers are a nuisance

> >GPL = different cars have different top speeds, engine temperaments,
> >sounds, gearboxes, suspensions, dashboards and colors and more
> >GP3 = different cars have different colors

> >GPL = The ability to use any steering wheel know to mankind with full
> >three axis support and fully twaekable FF support.
> >GP3 = "Huh, should I buy two joysticks now or what"?

> >GPL = hair on the chest (Ms. Hine et al excluded)
> >GP3 = translucent complexion and weak limbs

> >Need I go on? Don't even get me started on graphics.

> >/petern
> >/dons flameproof undies

Michel Marcott

UK PC Gamer gave GP3 game 95 % - do you agree?

by Michel Marcott » Sun, 30 Jul 2000 04:00:00

Personnally, 6.5/10 is enough:

10, minus 1 for the absence of AI cars sound,
minus 1 for poor 3D graphics,
minus 0.5 for the 2 years old season (98),
minus 0.5 for putting (what's his name?) instead of J, Villeneuve,
minus 0.5 for the limited number of views (1) that give you the
speed/gear/gas/etc information.

I'm eager to see what rating the US magazines will give to the game.
Americans aren't sold to F1 racing and should make more objective
reviews.



>Or Microprose payed for a big ad. inside the magazine and wanted a review
>with over 90% of the
>game ! Remember: Everybody has a price ! hehe





>> > How can you argue with such an un-biased review as that .NOT !
>> > So the missing 5% is for the:
>> > 1)***Graphics
>> > 2)***sound
>> > 3)Controller Setup bugs
>> > 4)Physics are strange
>> > 5)Replays of 20 seconds, max. etc..........
>> > The 95% must be for something i've missed.

>> Under the table payment to keep the *** business alive?

>> --



Graham Trigg

UK PC Gamer gave GP3 game 95 % - do you agree?

by Graham Trigg » Sun, 30 Jul 2000 04:00:00

minus 0.5 for having a wrong name because of ludicrous licensing deals, that
takes all of about 5 seconds to change? A little harsh there...

G


> Personnally, 6.5/10 is enough:

> 10, minus 1 for the absence of AI cars sound,
> minus 1 for poor 3D graphics,
> minus 0.5 for the 2 years old season (98),
> minus 0.5 for putting (what's his name?) instead of J, Villeneuve,
> minus 0.5 for the limited number of views (1) that give you the
> speed/gear/gas/etc information.

> I'm eager to see what rating the US magazines will give to the game.
> Americans aren't sold to F1 racing and should make more objective
> reviews.



> >Or Microprose payed for a big ad. inside the magazine and wanted a review
> >with over 90% of the
> >game ! Remember: Everybody has a price ! hehe





> >> > How can you argue with such an un-biased review as that .NOT !
> >> > So the missing 5% is for the:
> >> > 1)***Graphics
> >> > 2)***sound
> >> > 3)Controller Setup bugs
> >> > 4)Physics are strange
> >> > 5)Replays of 20 seconds, max. etc..........
> >> > The 95% must be for something i've missed.

> >> Under the table payment to keep the *** business alive?

> >> --



Snak

UK PC Gamer gave GP3 game 95 % - do you agree?

by Snak » Sun, 30 Jul 2000 04:00:00

I agree with that score, it`s not perfect but then again what is?, ***y
enjoyable and ***ive game though.

Snake.




>>Time for a heated debate.

>I, personally, would give it 85-90%.

David Butte

UK PC Gamer gave GP3 game 95 % - do you agree?

by David Butte » Sun, 30 Jul 2000 04:00:00


Good god. And there I was a couple of days ago parising PCG's tough
marking policy. Another one bites the dust... having played it for a
couple of hours, I think somewhere in the high 70s would be nearer the
mark - I'm certainly not returning it, it's a good game, but it's not
even close to the "revolutionary simulation system" advertised on the
box. It can't even cope with controllers with more than 4 buttons, fo
heaven's sake...

--
David. (GPLRank handicap: -3.01)
"After all, a mere thousand yards - such a harmless little knoll,
really."
(Raymond Mays on Shelsley Walsh)


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.