rec.autos.simulators

by **Brian Cl** » Sun, 22 Jun 1997 04:00:00

>>I have not played F1 yet,
>Good God, from what I've played of it, and what I've heard... it seems
>like an irrelevant addition to the racing scene. Oh well...

F1 is good to play good to watch, but No Network play, it seems they
could not get it wokring with the 3D Cards ???

How does POD and Moto Racer work then :-)

POD is ok but a little boring, Moto is fun and frantic although both
suffer when running an 8 man network
Brian Clay

http://www.racesimcentral.net/

by **Chri** » Fri, 27 Jun 1997 04:00:00

A full working version on a CD with no dribble ware.

by **este..** » Fri, 27 Jun 1997 04:00:00

On 19 Jun 1997 06:46:34 GMT, "Martin Tykesson"

>Man, was I let down by this title. F1 sux bigtime. U can't use joystick and
>the resume feature only works when U'r in the game. If U leave the game and

The joystick works great for me.

I'll take F1 any day over Pod. Pod is boring boring boring. I think
what you don't like is that POD does not look like a real racing game
so you hold it to a different standard. F1 is an arcade game but I
would say it is on the higher end of the arcade games and the graphics
are drop dead gorgeous.

Steve

[Remove the "NOSPAM." from my e-mail address if you wish to e-mail me]

by **NicolasGOULAR** » Sat, 28 Jun 1997 04:00:00

> > On POD: This game rocks. The speed. The fun when playing both championship
> > and multiplayer. New tracks and cars all the time. What more can one ask.

> A full working version on a CD with no dribble ware.

I have these 3 games, the best is Motoracer, then Pod... in my opinion.
Nicolas (french, like Motoracer and Pod).

rec.autos.simulators

POD or MotoRacer or F1 ?

POD or MotoRacer or F1 ?

POD or MotoRacer or F1 ?

POD or MotoRacer or F1 ?

POD or MotoRacer or F1 ?