rec.autos.simulators

OT: Indy 500 pathetic as usual.

J. Todd Wass

OT: Indy 500 pathetic as usual.

by J. Todd Wass » Sat, 05 Jun 2004 20:05:31


>Date: 6/4/2004 4:32 AM Central Daylight Time



>>>Date: 6/3/2004 8:39 PM Central Standard Time

>>>Mmmmm, making me want a Johnsonville soaked in beer and BBQ'd for dinner..

>>>Mitch

>> That's one I haven't tried yet :-)

>In Germany, we have the Bratwurst division up north where people start
>soaking and frying them in fat. Disgusting! The only true bratwurst
>comes off a charcoal bbq here, and a friend of mine living in Hamburg
>goes to the local "Schnelli" to have a real, char-coal grilled
>bratwurst first thing when he visits us here in Herford, such is the
>nastiness of fat-fried Bratwursts. <shudder ;->

>cheers,

>uwe

>--
>mail replies to Uwe at schuerkamp dot de ( yahoo address is spambox)
>Uwe Schuerkamp //////////////////////////// http://www.racesimcentral.net/
>Herford, Germany \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ (52.0N/8.5E)
>GPG Fingerprint:  2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F  67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61

Fat fried?  That can't be too tasty :-o  I imagine around here in Minnesota you
might get one cooked over a gas grill, but if you want one charcoaled you
better break out your own charcoaler.  Come to think of it, I don't think I've
ever had a brat that was cooked on one.  I'm drooling thinking about it :-)

Todd Wasson
Racing Software
http://www.racesimcentral.net/
http://www.racesimcentral.net/

Uwe Schürkam

OT: Indy 500 pathetic as usual.

by Uwe Schürkam » Sat, 05 Jun 2004 20:32:37


Lemme tell you, it's the only way. Served with a bit of mustard and a
cool beer, out in the yard on a summers evening... hmmmmm beer ;-)

Uwe

--
mail replies to Uwe at schuerkamp dot de ( yahoo address is spambox)
Uwe Schuerkamp //////////////////////////// http://www.schuerkamp.de/
Herford, Germany \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ (52.0N/8.5E)
GPG Fingerprint:  2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F  67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61

Eldre

OT: Indy 500 pathetic as usual.

by Eldre » Sat, 05 Jun 2004 21:16:50

And Hobbs & Co. usually mention the feed is provided by the local media.

Eldred
--
http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
Screamers League
IICC League
GPLRank -6.0    MoGPL rank +267.80
Ch.Rank +52.58   MoC +741.71
Hist. +82.34  MoH:na
N2k3 rank:in progress
Slayer Spektera lvl 72 assassin
Slayer Spectral_K lvl 38 Necro
US East

Eldre

OT: Indy 500 pathetic as usual.

by Eldre » Sat, 05 Jun 2004 21:17:59

Beer?  Yuck...
<g>

Eldred
--
http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
Screamers League
IICC League
GPLRank -6.0    MoGPL rank +267.80
Ch.Rank +52.58   MoC +741.71
Hist. +82.34  MoH:na
N2k3 rank:in progress
Slayer Spektera lvl 72 assassin
Slayer Spectral_K lvl 38 Necro
US East

Pez

OT: Indy 500 pathetic as usual.

by Pez » Sat, 05 Jun 2004 22:57:17

but not to johnny herbert, who, when he tested there, compared it to 4 curva
grandes.

dont forget too that curva grande is flat, flat out and in the lowest
downforce config they run.

pez




> >Date: 6/3/2004 8:10 PM Central Standard Time


> >>Date: 6/2/2004 6:11 PM Central Standard Time

> >>Check out the corner speed through Curva Grande.

> >>In the wet.
> >From here: http://www.fantasy-f1.net/circuits.asp?circuit=40

> >Not sure how accurate this is:

> >"Exiting the chicane leads to the long right-hander of the Curva Grande.
> >Entering at some 155mph in fourth gear, you accelerate through the corner
and
> >reach a speed of 183mph in sixth gear on the exit. "

> >That's in the dry...  At Indy, guys are entering the turn at well over
220mph
> >(230?) (around 45% faster).  And again, there's no run-off area...
Double
> >the
> >speed and you're 4 times as dangerous...  Doing 220 is twice as bad as
155
> >;-)
> >F1 is also running quite a lot more downforce than IRL cars at Indy.

> >Todd Wasson

> Also, from the following two sources:

> http://www.silhouet.com/motorsport/tracks/monza.html
> http://cbs.sportsline.com/autoracing/tracks/page/indianapolis

> If I'm not mistaken, Curva Grande is 24 meters wide, while Indy is only 14
> meters.  Curva Grande is 71% wider than Indy and the cars enter the corner
at
> only about 65% of the speed (in the dry of course).  Indy has no run off
area
> or sand traps.  (I don't think Curva Grande does either though, I'm not
sure)
> Anyway, I just don't see a comparison there.  The difference between the
two
> scenarios is absolutely huge ( to me anyway :-P)

> Todd Wasson
> Racing Software
> http://PerformanceSimulations.com
> http://performancesimulations.com/scnshot4.htm

Pez

OT: Indy 500 pathetic as usual.

by Pez » Sat, 05 Jun 2004 22:58:15

have you seen the steering wheel of the ferrari?

pez


> Let it be known that on Thu, 03 Jun 2004 05:27:17 GMT, Mike Donnelly Jr

> >In all the F1 races I've seen (and I've seen a number of them), I
> >can't remember *ever* seeing them make a wing adjustment.  I'm not
> >saying it doesn't happen, just that I haven't seen it.  Of course,
> >getting the feed through the locally controlled TV feed might be part
> >of the problem.  The cars making such adjustments might be doing so
> >off camera.

> I remember reading a interview with Montoya where he mentioned that F1
cars
> weren't nearly as adjustable as those in CART.

J. Todd Wass

OT: Indy 500 pathetic as usual.

by J. Todd Wass » Sun, 06 Jun 2004 01:11:39


>Date: 6/4/2004 8:57 AM Central Daylight Time

>but not to johnny herbert, who, when he tested there, compared it to 4 curva
>grandes.

>dont forget too that curva grande is flat, flat out and in the lowest
>downforce config they run.

>pez

And Curva Grande is still 71% wider and the cars, even when flat out, enter at
only 65% the speed....  :-)

Todd Wasson
Racing Software
http://PerformanceSimulations.com
http://performancesimulations.com/scnshot4.htm

J. Todd Wass

OT: Indy 500 pathetic as usual.

by J. Todd Wass » Sun, 06 Jun 2004 01:12:55


>Date: 6/4/2004 6:32 AM Central Daylight Time


>> Fat fried?  That can't be too tasty :-o  I imagine around here in Minnesota
>you
>> might get one cooked over a gas grill, but if you want one charcoaled you
>> better break out your own charcoaler.  Come to think of it, I don't think
>I've
>> ever had a brat that was cooked on one.  I'm drooling thinking about it :-)

>Lemme tell you, it's the only way. Served with a bit of mustard and a
>cool beer, out in the yard on a summers evening... hmmmmm beer ;-)

>Uwe

>--
>mail replies to Uwe at schuerkamp dot de ( yahoo address is spambox)
>Uwe Schuerkamp //////////////////////////// http://www.schuerkamp.de/
>Herford, Germany \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ (52.0N/8.5E)
>GPG Fingerprint:  2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F  67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61

Yummmy :-)  Beer?  I'll take a couple, thanks ;-)

Todd Wasson
Racing Software
http://PerformanceSimulations.com
http://performancesimulations.com/scnshot4.htm

Jason Moy

OT: Indy 500 pathetic as usual.

by Jason Moy » Sun, 06 Jun 2004 02:53:39


>have you seen the steering wheel of the ferrari?

He was probably referring more to aero and chassis tuning than in-car
adjustments.  Weight jacking and stagger and assymetrical setups are
still a novelty in F1 even after having guys like Villeneuve, Montoya,
Andretti the elder, etc come over and use them with some success.
Uwe Schürkam

OT: Indy 500 pathetic as usual.

by Uwe Schürkam » Sun, 06 Jun 2004 06:11:49


Todd, drop us a line when you happen to be in our part of Germany and
I'll be happy to have you for a couple of good old westfalian brews,
even one of mine own if I happen to have it in stock then ;-)

A genuine charcoal braty to go with it, to be sure.

cheers,

uwe

--
mail replies to Uwe at schuerkamp dot de ( yahoo address is spambox)
Uwe Schuerkamp //////////////////////////// http://www.schuerkamp.de/
Herford, Germany \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ (52.0N/8.5E)
GPG Fingerprint:  2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F  67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61

Mike Donnelly J

OT: Indy 500 pathetic as usual.

by Mike Donnelly J » Sun, 06 Jun 2004 10:41:57

Tells you when the last time I watched a F1 race was...  

Mike


>there is no locally controlled F1 feed anymore.

>everything comes from Bernie now.

>pez



>> In all the F1 races I've seen (and I've seen a number of them), I
>> can't remember *ever* seeing them make a wing adjustment.  I'm not
>> saying it doesn't happen, just that I haven't seen it.  Of course,
>> getting the feed through the locally controlled TV feed might be part
>> of the problem.  The cars making such adjustments might be doing so
>> off camera.

>> Mike


>> >you dont see them adjust the cars much during pit stops because of the
>> >amount of changes that the drivers can make to the cars whilst on track.

>> >the diff settings being the biggest.

>> >they do change front wing angles in the pits.

>> >pez










>> >> >> >>>It makes me sick what this once great race has now turned into.
>> >> >Pathetic...

>> >> >> >> I'd have to say that was one of the better ones as of late.

>> >> >> >Cripes, this was one of the better ones? Eeeeyuck...

>> >> >> >  > The weather really messed things up, but, you can't control the
>> >> >> >> weather.

>> >> >> >Must say that as a European, (we did get it live today on one cable
>> >> >> >channel), this was Boredom City guys.

>> >> >> As a European you show a significant ignorance as to oval racing.
>> >> >> Typical, but regretable.  The challenge in oval racing isn't sight
>> >> >> seeing, it's how to run a consistently fast line over the course of
>> >> >> 200 (in this case) laps.

>> >> >Same as in F1, except you might have 15 corners to get absolutely
>> >perfect,
>> >> >every lap, with the added difficulty of actual (and massive) braking
>and
>> >> >acceleration.

>> >> > > Perhaps you shouldn't have 'zapped by' but instead *watched* the
>> >> >> action.  The pits are a facinating part of the competition and pit
>> >> >> strategy and adjustments are crucial in winning an oval race.

>> >> >Try watching an F1 car pit.

>> >> I have.  All I ever see is them fueling and putting new tires on.
>> >> It's actually rather impressive from a technical point of view, but I
>> >> never see them make any adjustments to the car.  It seems that all the
>> >> pit strategy is thought out in advance rather than developed over the
>> >> course of the race, such as is done in oval racing.

>> >> >> >Maybe it's just me, but apart from the bits where they were
>actually
>> >up
>> >> >> >to speed for about 5 secs before the next yellow flag, it looked
>> >pretty
>> >> >> >boring to me, sorry.

>> >> >> >> There was abundant passing (something that doesn't happen in F1),

>> >> >But in F1 a pass actually means you've done something impressive and
>> >which
>> >> >requires skill.

>> >> Try passing at over 200 mph.  That does take skill as well.  One wrong
>> >> move and at least 2 cars are done for.

>> >> Really, I'd like to see Shumi at Indy in the 500.  No more super-team
>> >> to back him up with a super-car.  200 laps in a realatively equal car
>> >> with just the difference in how well prepared the team is for the race
>> >> and how well Shumi can call for adjustments.  I think he'd do well,
>> >> but I think he'd find it a lot more difficult that he'd imagine.  It
>> >> would be wonderful to see.

>> >> For *me* the problem in F1 is that equipment is far more important
>> >> that raw driving skill.  If you're not driving a Ferrarri (currently)
>> >> the odds of you winning go down dramatically.  The disparity in
>> >> equipment tends to make a F1 race a parade after a few corners with
>> >> only preplanned pit strategy to bring an upset.  Not a lot of fun for
>> >> me.

>> >> >> >You should've seen some of the (stupid) passes made today ;)

>> >> >> Making passes involves not only being faster than the person you're
>> >> >> passing but patience as to when and where to pass, not to mention
>how
>> >> >> you do it.

>> >> >You're describing a pass in F1. Passing in NASCAR or Indy is far
>easier
>> >than
>> >> >in F1. Get in the draft and then shoot by. Those series are
>artificially
>> >set
>> >> >up for a lot of passing.

>> >> Artificially set up?  How so?  I described passing in general, not
>> >> limiting myself to any form of racing.  It holds true in karts, stock
>> >> cars, sprints, touring cars, open wheels, anything short of rally
>> >> (where you don't have 2 cars in the same stretch of road - at least
>> >> not by design).

>> >> I like my ovals and I like them on asphalt.  That's my choice.
>> >> Occasionally I like to see a road course being used by cars designed
>> >> to run on them (ie. not stock cars) where a single manufacture isn't
>> >> allowed to dominate (ie. F1) through sheer engineering/ $.  That's my
>> >> preference.  Others might (do) like what I don't, and that's their
>> >> choice.  Good for them.  But to knock NASCAR/Indycar for their style
>> >> is childish at best - particularly if it's just because you don't like
>> >> them.

>> >> Mike

Mike Donnelly J

OT: Indy 500 pathetic as usual.

by Mike Donnelly J » Sun, 06 Jun 2004 10:42:00

I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of the adjustments can be done over
the air in terms of electronics.  That would eliminate many possible
adjustments right there.  All in all, it's still comparing apples and
oranges....

Mike



>Let it be known that on Thu, 03 Jun 2004 05:27:17 GMT, Mike Donnelly Jr

>>In all the F1 races I've seen (and I've seen a number of them), I
>>can't remember *ever* seeing them make a wing adjustment.  I'm not
>>saying it doesn't happen, just that I haven't seen it.  Of course,
>>getting the feed through the locally controlled TV feed might be part
>>of the problem.  The cars making such adjustments might be doing so
>>off camera.

>I remember reading a interview with Montoya where he mentioned that F1 cars
>weren't nearly as adjustable as those in CART.

Mike Donnelly J

OT: Indy 500 pathetic as usual.

by Mike Donnelly J » Sun, 06 Jun 2004 10:42:02

I imagine that even having a central control, they're still going to
focus on the 'local favorite'.  Makes sense.

Mike




>> Let it be known that on Thu, 3 Jun 2004 09:07:47 +0100, "Pez"


>> >there is no locally controlled F1 feed anymore.

>> >everything comes from Bernie now.

>> When the Australian GP focuses on Webber and the Spanish GP shows a lot of
>> Alonso, I'd say that the races are directed by local crews.

>As Pez states, F1 has its own tv crew and tons of support vehicles etc..in
>fact, the Machett, Varsha, and Hobbs talked about the *studio* at Monaco
>where they actualkly broadcast the telecast worldwide from.  F1 completely
>controls what the entire world sees, there are no other  tv cameras there...

J. Todd Wass

OT: Indy 500 pathetic as usual.

by J. Todd Wass » Sun, 06 Jun 2004 11:33:47


>Date: 6/4/2004 4:11 PM Central Daylight Time


>> Yummmy :-)  Beer?  I'll take a couple, thanks ;-)

>Todd, drop us a line when you happen to be in our part of Germany and
>I'll be happy to have you for a couple of good old westfalian brews,
>even one of mine own if I happen to have it in stock then ;-)

>A genuine charcoal braty to go with it, to be sure.

>cheers,

>uwe

>--
>mail replies to Uwe at schuerkamp dot de ( yahoo address is spambox)
>Uwe Schuerkamp //////////////////////////// http://www.schuerkamp.de/
>Herford, Germany \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ (52.0N/8.5E)
>GPG Fingerprint:  2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F  67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61

Mighty kind of you, Uwe :-)  I'll be over that side of the sea at the end of
this month.  Not sure if I'll make it out of the Netherlands though.  We'll see
:-)

Cheers,
Todd Wasson
Racing Software
http://PerformanceSimulations.com
http://performancesimulations.com/scnshot4.htm

Dave Henri

OT: Indy 500 pathetic as usual.

by Dave Henri » Sun, 06 Jun 2004 11:37:10



   That used to be the case in F1.  It got so bad that engineers were
controlling Max Engine revs/power during certain parts of a lap and
restricting power/revs at other parts of the lap.  That was all banned a
couple of years ago.  
    F1 cars have a myriad of incar adjustments.  Watch the incar cams
sometimes, the drivers are often twisting any number of knobs on the
wheel to change handling/engine performance etc.  
    So while you don't SEE the big wing changes like in CART or irl, you
also don't SEE the tiny adjustments from turn to turn the driver makes.  
From what I have gathered over the years, the F1 engineers tend to put
less of an emphasis on driver input and rely more and more on computer
analysis.  
     Before you say this is a bad thing, that is pretty much the case in
Nascar now too.  Take Penske South Racing for example.  Ryan Newman, a
young Gun, Computer literate, Engineering degree...Smart guy.
He and his team usually have their setups worked out in advance.  Very
few changes during the race.  His teammate, however, is Rusty Wallace, an
old school driver who would prefer to work out his engineering challenges
by the seat of his pants.    More and more though, Rusty has been
grudgingly pulled over to the computer side, but I'm sure he'll never
embrace it as whole heartedly as Newman.
    Cart used to be able to change several items while on track, like
Weight Jacking and Engine mapping(performance vs Fuel Economy) but with
the Customer Ford Engines now used, all the Engine tweeking is
gone...except for the 60 seconds of 'push to pass' that overrides the rev
limiter when activated.  
     Nascar has ZERO incar adjustments.  All that comes from driver and
crewchief talking while racing and making changes during pitstops.  
  Here endeth the short summary.

dh


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.