problems. I guess I'm looking for a guinea pig. ;-)
--
Richard "ZZ" Busch
Member:
Screamers Racing League
OAO
CORS
MARA TransAm
RASCAR
GPL Rank + 17.415
MoGPL Rank + 318.586
N2002 Rank + 7.695
TransAm Rank ??
--
Richard "ZZ" Busch
Member:
Screamers Racing League
OAO
CORS
MARA TransAm
RASCAR
GPL Rank + 17.415
MoGPL Rank + 318.586
N2002 Rank + 7.695
TransAm Rank ??
I think the 4.1's were worth a bit of a performance increase, or at least it
felt like it.
The NR2003 problems were not resolved in 4.2. It still says "a future
release". It's been what, four already ?
-Larry
We have had several people in our TPTCC league mention screen
blackouts with the 4.1's. Car keeps driving but the screen blacks out.
Caused a *** first turn wreck at Sebring. I think the ATI websites have
a utility that totally removes the old drivers, I wonder if these guys were
having file version conflicts. Anyone else experienced problems with the
4.x ATI drivers?
dave(using 3.7 since they seem to work just fine)henrie
> > I installed them. No chance to test yet.
> > I think the 4.1's were worth a bit of a performance increase, or at
> > least it felt like it.
> > The NR2003 problems were not resolved in 4.2. It still says "a future
> > release". It's been what, four already ?
> > -Larry
> We have had several people in our TPTCC league mention screen
> blackouts with the 4.1's. Car keeps driving but the screen blacks out.
> Caused a *** first turn wreck at Sebring. I think the ATI websites have
> a utility that totally removes the old drivers, I wonder if these guys
were
> having file version conflicts. Anyone else experienced problems with the
> 4.x ATI drivers?
> dave(using 3.7 since they seem to work just fine)henrie
Under ME I'm still using the 3.7, under W2k the absolute fps shown in
Lomac (the only game I play in W2k) is 1 or 2 fps lower with the 4.2
than with the 3.9, but the 4.2 are very smooth in the mountains where
for example the 3.7 get quite jerky.
So while the indicated fps is a tad lower with the 4.2, they're in the
end the better choice on my system under W2k.
Achim
> Have I ever done that publicly? :)
> Under ME I'm still using the 3.7, under W2k the absolute fps shown in
> Lomac (the only game I play in W2k) is 1 or 2 fps lower with the 4.2
> than with the 3.9, but the 4.2 are very smooth in the mountains where
> for example the 3.7 get quite jerky.
> So while the indicated fps is a tad lower with the 4.2, they're in the
> end the better choice on my system under W2k.
> Achim
Vintook
> > I installed them. No chance to test yet.
> > I think the 4.1's were worth a bit of a performance increase, or at
> > least it felt like it.
> > The NR2003 problems were not resolved in 4.2. It still says "a future
> > release". It's been what, four already ?
> > -Larry
> We have had several people in our TPTCC league mention screen
> blackouts with the 4.1's. Car keeps driving but the screen blacks out.
> Caused a *** first turn wreck at Sebring. I think the ATI websites have
> a utility that totally removes the old drivers, I wonder if these guys
were
> having file version conflicts. Anyone else experienced problems with the
> 4.x ATI drivers?
> dave(using 3.7 since they seem to work just fine)henrie