On Mon, 08 Jul 2002 21:02:25 GMT, "Alan Bernardo"
>Here we go again. Just because computer golf is not interesting to you
>doesn't mean it's not interesting to someone else. Some say GPL is the best
>racing simulator: some don't. Who is to argue.
Apparently you are, based on your 200 posts on the subject. =)
FWIW, I was teasing Francois. I play PGA 2000 Titanium constantly.
You're also responding to a post I made at least a month ago and
taking it completely out of context of the thread. Personally, I like
to reserve the phrase "here we go again" to something that is in the
process of occurring or has recently occurred. In the context of
replying to something that was said over one month ago, it seems
strangely out of place.
If I'm making a subjective statement, the average-to-intelligent
person would assume that it was my opinion. If it weren't my opinion,
why would I be offering it?
Let me offer an example, to clarify the point further:
Jason moyer said:
There are a few pieces of information you need to properly process
this sentence:
A. the statement itself
B. the person making the statement
In this particular example, variable A = "Modern Formula One circuits
are shite." and variable B = "Jason Moyer" aka me aka the person
making the subjective statement contained within variable A.
The conclusion that can be logically drawn from this information is
that variable B, "Jason Moyer" aka me aka the person making this
statement, of sound mind and body hereby holds true the opinion of
variable A, that is, "Modern Formula One circuits are shite."
QED, Jason Moyer believes that modern formula one circuits are shite.
Class, are we all together on this one?
Welcome to planet earth. May I please see your passport?
Jason