rec.autos.simulators

RASCAR:Bristol

Tim

RASCAR:Bristol

by Tim » Wed, 26 Mar 2003 07:24:45

damn that speelchecker
:)

--
Tim White
www.intracmotorsports.com




> > To make sure, I tested that setup w/18 gallons and feash tires,
> > and ran 3-4 15.8s and a few 9s and went right into the 16s,
> > just like you did.

> Where can I get the "feash tires" patch. If that's why you're always
> so much faster than me, I want to use it too.

> :)

Pete

RASCAR:Bristol

by Pete » Wed, 26 Mar 2003 07:31:25

    Once a cheater always a cheater. Take it anyway you want.
By the way still using Windows 98? Too bad tire hack doesn't work
with N2003.
    You are such an all knowing all seeing wiz. Its funny I try to bring out
something that might help people having a problem and it ruffles your
feathers.
    I could play the same game and say that the setups you do to help people
are
junk but I'm sure there are people that have some use for them.
    I'll help anyone that asks if I can. You are so uniformed or playing
purposefully
naive on the cheat issue. Perhaps for personal reasons.
    As far as your swearing how mature, really shows your mentality.
    There was no constuctive message in any of your posts if there had of
been I would
have listened.
    Have a good one.

    Pete


online racers will never see the difference.
another mountain out of a mole hill.  I never said you said you
describe your practice times as "I wasn't really pushing it ...
other number of lame excuses for your performance or lack
majority of the racers on RASCAR do not care about that
fun.  Since you never seem to have anything good to say about
league would have it?  Perhaps not.
did not indicate anything other than hotlapping, and
it was obviously a mistake to try to explain a possible,
pontificating how every little quirk in the sim is either a
still the best sim out there and, up to now, I am overall
program in a phone conversation in 1997, after he was
program, to explain to him that he hadn't actually
thanked me by the way.  He called me, and wanted new
accomplished.  I believe the ideals of it are still one of the
mention all the facts, your opinions there are as biased
when you mislead people like you do with your bug hunts,
mine, were is up to him.  You thinking that information
don't recall you helping anyone with how to actually drive
offering personal setups free to the public.
of getting better is by making everyone else around them
of for it.  The examples these guys set for one another do
continue to race, since your excuses become self evident over
unless you find Wilshes diskettes sitting on my desk.

Pete

RASCAR:Bristol

by Pete » Wed, 26 Mar 2003 07:32:58

    Thats even better! Consorting with a known cheat. LMAO
Were you giving him pointers or vice versa.


Tim

RASCAR:Bristol

by Tim » Wed, 26 Mar 2003 08:08:25

:)

lol, your either being really gullible, or just plain desperate, but Don just maybe making you feel pretty embarrassed right about
now.

Ask him what I actually did to the Fastlap program.  If he remembers, nothing.

What I did was start it with a dos batch file that captured the system clock, and reset it to what his program would expect on exit,
to stay within the time limit set for a single qualifying attempt.  All that did was allow me to run as many qualifying attempts as
I wanted without having to exit and restart the game and Fastlap.  The lap times, and the setups were legit.  Ask Don if he copied
anything else different from my computer.

Was that unfair? Yep. Everyone else had to exit the game, the Fastlap program, and wait to restart, another few minutes later.  Was
it cheating?  That's anyone's call since I did no memory or file alterations.  Want to know where my inspiration came from?  At a
friends house and watching him run the game on two different computers. Run one qual attempt while the other PC was reloading the
game lol.

Sue me for being impatient :)  What I had told Don was if he was going to run Fastlap for N2, to write the system date/time on start
to an encrypted file the way he was encrypting everything else on exit.  This and only this 'hack', could be avoided.  If there was
anything else out there, anything more serious like a diskette lying around somewhere :), then nothing would help.  His response was
TEN pretty much assured no real interest in an offline qualifying competition, but he'd think about it.

And since you think you have such a great handle on setups that the average guy can drive and not be embarrassed, sharing yours now?

Oh, and as if you would care to ackowledge, with all the early cautions you were still running 16.1s;
Except for the times you put it on the apron, with the occasional 17.+ sec lap, you were still faster than me;
At the start of the race;
When the papy gremlins jumped over the bushes and let you think you knew what you were doing.

--
Tim White
www.intracmotorsports.com


>     Once a cheater always a cheater. Take it anyway you want.
> By the way still using Windows 98? Too bad tire hack doesn't work
> with N2003.
>     You are such an all knowing all seeing wiz. Its funny I try to bring out
> something that might help people having a problem and it ruffles your
> feathers.
>     I could play the same game and say that the setups you do to help people
> are
> junk but I'm sure there are people that have some use for them.
>     I'll help anyone that asks if I can. You are so uniformed or playing
> purposefully
> naive on the cheat issue. Perhaps for personal reasons.
>     As far as your swearing how mature, really shows your mentality.
>     There was no constuctive message in any of your posts if there had of
> been I would
> have listened.
>     Have a good one.

>     Pete



> > Pots, don't make or break a sim, for christsakes, let it go.  99% of the
> online racers will never see the difference.

> > But as your reputation proceeds you, you seem to be intent on making
> another mountain out of a mole hill.  I never said you said you
> > were the fastest; we all know you, and I, are not.  Even though you
> describe your practice times as "I wasn't really pushing it ...
> > bla bla bla"

> > Every damn time someone like you cries 'cheater', and 'bugs', and any
> other number of lame excuses for your performance or lack
> > thereof, is just plain stupid.  I for one, am tired of it Pete.  The vast
> majority of the racers on RASCAR do not care about that
> > crap; unless I am misreading this ng, they just want to race, and have
> fun.  Since you never seem to have anything good to say about
> > someone else's work, your opinions continue to come across as jaded.

> > I suspect the only reason we hear about your theories here, is no other
> league would have it?  Perhaps not.

> > But you are in fact failing to recognize that the lap times you did simply
> did not indicate anything other than hotlapping, and
> > fuel.  Period.  In my silly attempt to try to help you figure things out,
> it was obviously a mistake to try to explain a possible,
> > valid reason.

> > I am sorry we disagree on how great a sim, or not, N2003 is, but you
> pontificating how every little quirk in the sim is either a
> > bug, or a cheat, is utter useless to this group.  No one cares, it is
> still the best sim out there and, up to now, I am overall
> > extremely pleased with what we have to race with.

> > Now, as for you pacifying yourself by labeling me a cheater ...

> > For the record, I told (only) Don about hacking his attempt at the Fastlap
> program in a phone conversation in 1997, after he was
> > banned from the NROS for privately downloading everyones' setups with that
> program, to explain to him that he hadn't actually
> > achieved what he thought he had with his software protection, of which he
> thanked me by the way.  He called me, and wanted new
> > teammates, and I thanked him for the idea of what Fastlap could've
> accomplished.  I believe the ideals of it are still one of the
> > great innovations of online racing.

> > I will assume that since you either ignored that, or Don simply forgot to
> mention all the facts, your opinions there are as biased
> > as everything else you seem to have to offer.

> > You are free to say whatever you like on a ng without a moderator, but
> when you mislead people like you do with your bug hunts,
> > don't get your panties in such a wad when someone finds fault in your
> facts.

> > That Don chooses to tell anyone who will listen, what his intentions, or
> mine, were is up to him.  You thinking that information
> > will somehow tarnish what I've tried to do online is a waste of time.  I
> don't recall you helping anyone with how to actually drive
> > faster, longer, manipulate what holes the game may legally allow, or
> offering personal setups free to the public.

> > On the contrary, your the worst kind of online racer; one whose only way
> of getting better is by making everyone else around them
> > look worse.  If you never race another RASCAR event again, we'd be better
> of for it.  The examples these guys set for one another do
> > more good then any harm you can really do.  I honestly hope you do
> continue to race, since your excuses become self evident over
> > time.

> > Regardless, don't ever call me a cheater again, you sick miserable ***,
> unless you find Wilshes diskettes sitting on my desk.

> > --
> > Tim White
> > www.intracmotorsports.com

Eldre

RASCAR:Bristol

by Eldre » Wed, 26 Mar 2003 08:25:26



>    This is  totally unrealistic and is a flaw in the game. If I can't see
>where the pace car is how can I judge where I am in order
>not to be BF'd.

F2 screen, Pete.

Eldred
--
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
GPLRank:-1.680
MonsterRank: +334.169
N2002 Rank:+17.59

Never argue with an idiot.  He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

Pete

RASCAR:Bristol

by Pete » Wed, 26 Mar 2003 08:44:04


just maybe making you feel pretty embarrassed right about
nothing.

    Actually, I heard it a long time ago from someone other than Don. Don
hasn't told me anything about the
details.
    I may be gullible but if find it ironic that you are arguing about the
pots, never having even tried it. So how
would you even know? Other than trying to be a know-it-all.

clock, and reset it to what his program would expect on exit,
that did was allow me to run as many qualifying attempts as
times, and the setups were legit.  Ask Don if he copied
program, and wait to restart, another few minutes later.  Was
alterations.  Want to know where my inspiration came from?  At a
Run one qual attempt while the other PC was reloading the
run Fastlap for N2, to write the system date/time on start
This and only this 'hack', could be avoided.  If there was
around somewhere :), then nothing would help.  His response was
competition, but he'd think about it.

    For someone not cheating it seems you are overly defensive. Touch a raw
nerve?

average guy can drive and not be embarrassed, sharing yours now?

    If your setups are so great why would I need to? Someone who is such a
master of the game as you would only
find it demeaning. If someone needs help all they have to do is ask. Besides
my posting setups would obviously be
misconstrued on your part as me wanting to bring attention to myself.

you were still running 16.1s;
lap, you were still faster than me;

    If I was faster than you at the start why did you get out on me by
several seconds? But then again how many
people did you hit during race? I started driving agressively to make up the
lost laps but still didn't hit anyone what
was your excuse?

what you were doing.

    Yes, I admit I was caught unawares of the idiosyncrasies of the game and
its difficult to judge your pit
entrance in relation to a pace car you can't see.
    Its too bad that the race had to be decided on questionable faults in
the game. I would rather the race be
decided on the track as opposed BF's. I thought you made a very gracious
gesture in letting me back on the
lead lap after the BF's and said so. I also thought you ran a good race and
congratulated you. But now I see
that its obvious that you fear competition and your attacks and suggestion I
leave the league seem to guided
by this fear.

    Pete

Tim

RASCAR:Bristol

by Tim » Wed, 26 Mar 2003 09:29:15

Really, Pete.

Maybe you like it when someone slams you about something as sensitive as cheating, but then again, since your not that fast (your
own words) who could possibly label you a cheater right?  I could call you and your pots ugly names from your front lawn after
midnight, but if I say chasing potentiometers is a waste of time, I've really gone overboard huh lol.

It wasn't cheating, it was being impatient; remember that :)

But let me make sure I have this right ... beta tester for N1, and having the ability to make such great setups 7 years later ...
and you couldn't figure out the F2 screen?

Now Pete, don't get me wrong, I can see how those thousands of laps testing (your words) could have easily clouded someone's ability
to use the actual game features to avoid a BF, and not be forced to resorting to calling out for a bug.

But wouldn't claiming you have good setups, while trashing others who offer theirs, and then refusing to share yours, and THEN
saying your above all the pettiness of sharing setups ... wouldn't that pretty much sum up your real interests in helping others?
Tell you what, send your best setups to everyone but me, privately.  And insist they never reveal such kindness on your part.  That
will make me, and everyone who really just wants your setups :) a happy camper ... or maybe we can blame it on the pots lol

Seriously, you found something about pots that makes a difference for Some, not all, some.  Great.  I'm happy for you.

But dayem, if you couldn't figure out the F2 screen, I'm not sure I trust your pottyonics afterall.

The race wasn't decided on BFs, we all got them.  Wake up.  Hell, Mike Grandy got whacked under the first caution and we never had
to deal with him.  Grandy's the king of Bristol.  Wasn't a bogus BF for him.  I'd take bogus BFs over warping any day.

So, if you insist on picking on one thing I said; that being what little importance I put on pots, or your opinion of them making a
lousy racer one of the best and refusing to accept any of the original suggestions I offered about your lap times, who said I didn't
test pots?

I said I am running with the same equipment I always run.  That means I know nothing about potentiometers?  Maybe not, but I sure as
hell know where the pace car is.

:)

--
Tim White
www.intracmotorsports.com

ymenar

RASCAR:Bristol

by ymenar » Wed, 26 Mar 2003 09:38:24


> you need to tell Derek Woods, Tyler Hudson and Kevin King that.. They
claim
> and i have heard that Papyrus also says now that
> the aides make you faster.

It's neiter completely true or false.  I have also said (and once used in a
practice race for a league) that driving with the ABS at Loudon made me not
faster, but in long term I had freshier tyres as the race went on.  But then
again, I would have been faster if I had turned it off, and used serious
braking balance instead.  It's still an aid, it's by a computer, therefore
it can be imperfect from time to time.

--
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
-- http://ymenard.cjb.net/
-- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez
Corporation - helping America into the New World...

ymenar

RASCAR:Bristol

by ymenar » Wed, 26 Mar 2003 09:41:54


> He probably passed the pace car BEFORE he actually got on pit road.
> If you do that (at any track) you'll get a bf.  You'll also get one
> if you pass another car on your way to pitroad and then enter pitroad
> before that car passes you back.

Reminds me of the NROS, where some guys at Bristol that would stay on the
track instead of pitting would brake _hard_ before everybody entered the
pitroad so that he would be "passed" according to the sim.  That would
sometime give BF's to those guys entering pitroad.

That hasn't changed since eh :) :(

--
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
-- http://ymenard.cjb.net/
-- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez
Corporation - helping America into the New World...

David Lanphea

RASCAR:Bristol

by David Lanphea » Wed, 26 Mar 2003 11:49:34

I don't know if this is pertinent to your situation, but it came up in a
league race at Bristol also.

A driver received a BF for speeding in the pits. His spotter told him he had
to DRIVE down pit road. He did three Green flag Stop and Go's and was
eventually DQed for not clearing the black flag. Subsequent investigations
(ie reading the manual/text files) alerted him to the fact that if you
receive a "Drive down pit road" black flag, then you MUST only DRIVE DOWN
PIT ROAD, no stopping in your pit box or the BF will not be cleared.

Pete

RASCAR:Bristol

by Pete » Wed, 26 Mar 2003 12:54:46

    Oh my you don't like being called a cheater after insulting me, poor
baby. Why don't you swear
some more it is so becoming.
    Its funny that ECCI and TSW agreed with me but psychic Timmy is all
knowing, all seeing even
though he admittedly never tried it. What a star, you really do shine. You
still haven't answered my
question about XP. But I'm assuming there is a modicom of intelliegence on
the other end and it
seems I have over stepped the bounds of good judgement here. My mistake
sorry.
    I noticed your impatience while racing, all those appologies for running
into slower cars.
    Nice try I tell you about problems with controllers and timing and you
change the tune to doing
setups. Great stretch! By the way I did play all the Nascar titles so keep
stretching.
    Yeah, I guess I blew it with the F2 screen. I usually test and tune and
do laps I don't get into pickup
races nor do single off line races this was my fault for over-estimating the
sims abilities.
    Please quote me correctly I said a thousand not thousands. I know your
reading comprehension is
at the level of a grade school child but remedial help may bring you up to
speed.
    My trashing of your setups was playing at your level of criticism.
What's wrong burr under your
saddle? I could care less about whether they are good bad or indifferent. My
setups are given to those
who have need. I gave to the needy not the greedy.
    Maybe if there hadn't been so many BF's for all it might have been a
more interesting race. You
can pander your petty views all you want. I expressed an opinion as did many
others but you chose
me to pick a fight with me. I guess this is your way of dealing with people
you don't want in the league.
    You are intitled to your worthless points of view and so am I. Maybe, I
spoke out of emotion and
made some mistakes but whats your excuse Mr. Psychic?
    I guess you have shown that trying to help people is reserved only for
whoever you choose. If you
don't choose to believe me or the wheel manufacturers you could have ignored
it but I guess you had
an agenda.
    I decided to do a little racing to have some fun but I forgot that
people like you with the big Ego's
are still around. Yes I have an ego to but I try to compete against myself
and do the best I can to only
please myself. Unfortunately, clowns like you can bring the worst out in me.
    In the future I will take your spew with a grain of salt. You just
aren't worth it.

    Pete


cheating, but then again, since your not that fast (your
and your pots ugly names from your front lawn after
really gone overboard huh lol.
the ability to make such great setups 7 years later ...
testing (your words) could have easily clouded someone's ability
resorting to calling out for a bug.
offer theirs, and then refusing to share yours, and THEN
pretty much sum up your real interests in helping others?
insist they never reveal such kindness on your part.  That
camper ... or maybe we can blame it on the pots lol
Some, not all, some.  Great.  I'm happy for you.
your pottyonics afterall.
Grandy got whacked under the first caution and we never had
him.  I'd take bogus BFs over warping any day.
importance I put on pots, or your opinion of them making a
suggestions I offered about your lap times, who said I didn't
know nothing about potentiometers?  Maybe not, but I sure as

DW

RASCAR:Bristol

by DW » Wed, 26 Mar 2003 13:54:13

Don't worry about this guys comments Pete. I now remember this Tim White as
TBase in the NROS competition on TEN a few years ago. He made it to the
finals but got kicked out for intentionally wrecking, pretty-much
undermining any attempt to legitimize online racing at that point in time.
Looks like he crawled out of the woodwork once again to wreak havoc on the
online racing community.



> > Not to be a stickler about you and your pots Pete, but I'm using a 5 yo
> ECCI, with the original pots, and I've not seen any changes
> > from sim to sim, other than the physics model.

>     You know it amazes me that you selectively read what I post. There is
a
> timing issue in ALL Papyrus versions. I have
> half a dozen wheels including an ECCI and I see a difference between all
the
> wheels. I will only tell you once more we
> went through this in BETA testing for the original Nascar game. I can't
help
> it if my dealing directly with Papyrus coders
> at the time is not reliable enough for you.
>     The fact you haven't seen any changes is because there haven't been
any,
> the timimg issue has been there all along.
> Now if I recall and I could be wrong you run windows 98 I have been
running
> XP since it came out. Perhaps you should
> talk with the ECCI and TSW people(I have) and there is an issue with XP
and
> certain pots. But then again I suppose you
> know more than they do.
>     I will also take some solice in the fact many people have emailed me
to
> tell me they have seen a big improvement in
> the way the game drives by changing pots. That fact alone makes it
> worthwhile. Just because you take exception I could
> care less.

> > I checked the replay for Saturdays race ...

> >     John is right, you passed the pace car, right before you were
actually
> on pit row, a clear violation since you are not, at that
> > point, limited to pit row speed, and you could've re entered the track.
> >     You only did 4 15.8s the whole race and the fastest was an .845.
All
> of them were right after putting on fresh tires.
> >     Your only did one before lap 175 and that was on L. 128.  Every stop
> you made after your one around lap 85 did not fill up the
> > tank; remembering a full tank is 186 laps so after that stop around L85
> you were never again running with a full tank.  To make
> > sure, I tested that setup w/18 gallons and feash tires, and ran 3-4
15.8s
> and a few 9s and went right into the 16s, just like you
> > did.
> >     The 3 mid 8's you did with about 25 to go, on fresh tires, were
> followed by about 4-5 high 9s, then you went right into the 16s,
> > like the rest of us.

>     The point I was trying to make was not how fast I could go but the
fact
> that when the race started I could hardly do 116's
> without bouncing off the walls. In other words it was overly tight from
what
> it had been any other time I had used it. Many 100's
> if not a thousand laps in practice both online and off. I'm sorry you
think
> that I'm a liar and can't tell the difference.
>     You know I could careless if I'm the fastest out there unlike you. Why
> don't you tell everyone about how you hacked
> the Fast Lap program years ago so you could be the fastest. Unless that
was
> a different Tim White.

> >     I'll agree there are bugs in the game but I seriously doubt loading
> 'faster' setups in a fixed setup race is one of them.

>     You are an expert on bugs in the game now! Wow I'm impressed.

> >     To be honest Pete, you can call me delusional all you like, but this
> is by far the best sim, the best version, we've ever had.
> > I have taken my share of pot shots (no pun intended) at Papyrus but
quite
> frankly, I think it is an awesome sim, with more features
> > than we've ever had.  If you think back to what N1 really was, and what
we
> have now, how could anyone be anything but satisfied?

>     There you go with your poor reading comprehension again. When have I
> stated that this game wasn't the best we have ever had.

> >     At some point you either accept and enjoy what's out there, or start
> sounding like Michael Moorer; sooner or later, no one will
> > pay any attention to what you say :)

>     I am enjoying it other wise I wouldn't be playing it. As far as
sounding
> like Michael Moorer I'd rather be classified as an Ass
> rather than the hacker you used to be. I tried to pass along things that I
> have learned and if you find that offensive too bad.

>     Pete

Pete

RASCAR:Bristol

by Pete » Wed, 26 Mar 2003 16:31:01

    DW, this now rings a bell. I have been trying to place him since the
first
time he said something to me. TBase now I know who he is.
    I could go into a lot more detail on the whole thing but I would be
wasting
my time. If a person isn't having problems with the game steering wise than
obviously
you don't need to fix something that isn't broken. I offered a suggestion to
help those
that were frustrated and get ridiculed for it.
    I know at times I'm not the most diplomatic or discrete but I do know
what I have
experimented with and I know the results. Others have emailed me and had
success as
well, thats good enough for me.
    I gave up racing in the open setup forum years ago because I got tired
of the egos and
the win at all cost mentality and that includes my own.
        I wasn't looking to cause a problem but I guess I got carried away
after the race.
Time to move past him.

    Pete


Tim

RASCAR:Bristol

by Tim » Thu, 27 Mar 2003 02:16:10


btw I was able to retire of tbase software; still at work??

:)

--
Tim White
www.intracmotorsports.com


> Don't worry about this guys comments Pete. I now remember this Tim White as
> TBase in the NROS competition on TEN a few years ago. He made it to the
> finals but got kicked out for intentionally wrecking, pretty-much
> undermining any attempt to legitimize online racing at that point in time.
> Looks like he crawled out of the woodwork once again to wreak havoc on the
> online racing community.




> > > Not to be a stickler about you and your pots Pete, but I'm using a 5 yo
> > ECCI, with the original pots, and I've not seen any changes
> > > from sim to sim, other than the physics model.

> >     You know it amazes me that you selectively read what I post. There is
> a
> > timing issue in ALL Papyrus versions. I have
> > half a dozen wheels including an ECCI and I see a difference between all
> the
> > wheels. I will only tell you once more we
> > went through this in BETA testing for the original Nascar game. I can't
> help
> > it if my dealing directly with Papyrus coders
> > at the time is not reliable enough for you.
> >     The fact you haven't seen any changes is because there haven't been
> any,
> > the timimg issue has been there all along.
> > Now if I recall and I could be wrong you run windows 98 I have been
> running
> > XP since it came out. Perhaps you should
> > talk with the ECCI and TSW people(I have) and there is an issue with XP
> and
> > certain pots. But then again I suppose you
> > know more than they do.
> >     I will also take some solice in the fact many people have emailed me
> to
> > tell me they have seen a big improvement in
> > the way the game drives by changing pots. That fact alone makes it
> > worthwhile. Just because you take exception I could
> > care less.

> > > I checked the replay for Saturdays race ...

> > >     John is right, you passed the pace car, right before you were
> actually
> > on pit row, a clear violation since you are not, at that
> > > point, limited to pit row speed, and you could've re entered the track.
> > >     You only did 4 15.8s the whole race and the fastest was an .845.
> All
> > of them were right after putting on fresh tires.
> > >     Your only did one before lap 175 and that was on L. 128.  Every stop
> > you made after your one around lap 85 did not fill up the
> > > tank; remembering a full tank is 186 laps so after that stop around L85
> > you were never again running with a full tank.  To make
> > > sure, I tested that setup w/18 gallons and feash tires, and ran 3-4
> 15.8s
> > and a few 9s and went right into the 16s, just like you
> > > did.
> > >     The 3 mid 8's you did with about 25 to go, on fresh tires, were
> > followed by about 4-5 high 9s, then you went right into the 16s,
> > > like the rest of us.

> >     The point I was trying to make was not how fast I could go but the
> fact
> > that when the race started I could hardly do 116's
> > without bouncing off the walls. In other words it was overly tight from
> what
> > it had been any other time I had used it. Many 100's
> > if not a thousand laps in practice both online and off. I'm sorry you
> think
> > that I'm a liar and can't tell the difference.
> >     You know I could careless if I'm the fastest out there unlike you. Why
> > don't you tell everyone about how you hacked
> > the Fast Lap program years ago so you could be the fastest. Unless that
> was
> > a different Tim White.

> > >     I'll agree there are bugs in the game but I seriously doubt loading
> > 'faster' setups in a fixed setup race is one of them.

> >     You are an expert on bugs in the game now! Wow I'm impressed.

> > >     To be honest Pete, you can call me delusional all you like, but this
> > is by far the best sim, the best version, we've ever had.
> > > I have taken my share of pot shots (no pun intended) at Papyrus but
> quite
> > frankly, I think it is an awesome sim, with more features
> > > than we've ever had.  If you think back to what N1 really was, and what
> we
> > have now, how could anyone be anything but satisfied?

> >     There you go with your poor reading comprehension again. When have I
> > stated that this game wasn't the best we have ever had.

> > >     At some point you either accept and enjoy what's out there, or start
> > sounding like Michael Moorer; sooner or later, no one will
> > > pay any attention to what you say :)

> >     I am enjoying it other wise I wouldn't be playing it. As far as
> sounding
> > like Michael Moorer I'd rather be classified as an Ass
> > rather than the hacker you used to be. I tried to pass along things that I
> > have learned and if you find that offensive too bad.

> >     Pete

Tim

RASCAR:Bristol

by Tim » Thu, 27 Mar 2003 02:19:29

So now your calling everyone on RASCAR greedy?
I thought it was just me. :)

--
Tim White
www.intracmotorsports.com


> saddle? I could care less about whether they are good bad or indifferent. My
> setups are given to those
> who have need. I gave to the needy not the greedy.


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.