I bought N3 a week ago and it seems to be an upgrade that's just about the same
as N2 was to N1. The 1024 x 768 resolution is beautiful and my system handles
it very smoothly. Perhaps it's my imagination, but just racing with the traffic
seems more "NASCAR-like" It could just be the graphics have lulled me into a
deja-vu stupor. I've only had a week on the thing, but I like it, and the more
I run it the more I like it.
> Totally true John, I still think that even if I was one of the person who
> was the most against the old game engine in N3, they took the correct
> decision. N3 is still a _solid_ title. It's better than most of the racing
> games on the market, and has sometimes few games have, all-around :
> Gameplay. Look at how deep it is, whatever if it's an upgrade or not.
> Nascar 1 was years ahead of anything, and N2 also was. It's normal that
> because of the old game engine this factor has come down a little, but it's
> still a quality title that few *** companies produce. I hope N3 sells
> well, this way we could finally have something else than mostly stockcar
> titles by Papyrus. There was a shortage of Stock-car titles on the market
> for Christmas, they knew they could split the HQ into different projects and
> still continue R&D on N4 and the new game engine. It's only about a year
> away :)
> Im totally pleased about N3, but at the moment I have not bought it, for
> many reasons, including the poor implementation of online racing and the
> 4years backward step it currently has. "has" is the correct term :)
> --
> -- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
> -- May the Downforce be with you...
> "People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
> how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."
--
Bob Curtin
Worcester Area Strategy & Tactics Exchange
http://www.racesimcentral.net/
"If God had intended men to join the Army he would have given us green, baggy
skin"