>Jeez everyone knows they come from under cabbages. Anyway I've got a PIII
>450. What drivers are they talking about in this thread?
The Excelsior
"ICQ #40620378"
The Excelsior
"ICQ #40620378"
Nope, I don't.
The Excelsior
"ICQ #40620378"
>> > I get enough ribbing for my spelling already but you must admit that mixing
>> > stalks and storks is funny. No offence given!
>> poke poke poke poke....
>> It's offense.
>Argh - you're opening up a whole new can of worms: different English and
>American spelling!
>There's no way back noooooww.......
;-)
The Excelsior
"ICQ #40620378"
I'd rather hear you defend your fabrication. You make some good points, but
when you make things up to defend yourself, you lose credibility.
~daxe
Actually, when it comes to the English language, I consider the English to be
correct. Is 'offence' the proper way to spell the word in Britain? Is it
possible that that most grating of misspellings, 'loosing', is also correct in
Britain? Someone please help me with this?
~daxe
> > I get enough ribbing for my spelling already but you must admit that mixing
> > stalks and storks is funny. No offence given!
> poke poke poke poke....
> It's offense.
There's no way back noooooww.......
Mark
> > >Argh - you're opening up a whole new can of worms: different English
and
> > >American spelling!
> > >There's no way back noooooww.......
> > And since Americans are speaking a 'false' English language, we Brits'
> > must be right!
> Actually, when it comes to the English language, I consider the English to
be
> correct. Is 'offence' the proper way to spell the word in Britain? Is it
> possible that that most grating of misspellings, 'loosing', is also
correct in
> Britain? Someone please help me with this?
> ~daxe
> > I get enough ribbing for my spelling already but you must admit that mixing
> > stalks and storks is funny. No offence given!
> poke poke poke poke....
> It's offense.
> :o)
> ~daxe
> >I get enough ribbing for my spelling already but you must admit that mixing
> >stalks and storks is funny. No offence given!
> Nope, I don't.
> The Excelsior
> "ICQ #40620378"
>I'd rather hear you defend your fabrication. You make some good points, but
>when you make things up to defend yourself, you lose credibility.
I don't appreciate being called a liar. I can't be expected to know
the setup of other peoples computers. I've given you his e-mail
address, so go ask him!
BTW, depending on which country you're in, and which country they sell
to, try to find a copy of this months "PC Reviewer". Their 'Build Your
Own' page usually has good advice as to where you can pick up parts
and how you can integrate them into your system.
They have an excellent piece of dual processors a few weeks back...
The Excelsior
"ICQ #40620378"
If you aren't willing or able to defend what you say, don't say it. You quoted
someone' specs and I asked you about what you said. Now you won't own up to
what you said. An unsubstantiated statement is a lie.
I have 6 computers in my house and I built every one of them from scratch. That
isn't counting the dozen or so computers I have built for other people scattered
here and there. I don;t really think I need 'advice' on how to integrate parts
into computers.
daxe
I looked it up, too. My dictionary listed offence and just referrred me to
the definition for offense, so they are apparently both correct. Under the
definition for offense, it listed the other spelling and said 'Chiefly Brit.'
There we have it.
daxe
ROFL!!
The Excelsior
"ICQ #40620378"
Nuff said!
The Excelsior
"ICQ #40620378"
You're full of crap. You are lying to cover up a misstatement. To defend
yourself you told me to ask someone else. In private email you send me to:
www.future-computers.net/ram/order/ram.html
There is no DNS entry for this site. Whois reports nothing. You made up the
URL. Your response will probably be that 'just because I can't get there,
doesn't mean it doesn't exist.' Another lie.
I will be perfectly willing to apologize to you and admit I am wrong when you
give me substantial evidence to back up your claims. The fact is: There are no
360MB RAM chips. There is no combination of chips that adds up to that amount.
You claim all these wondrous things are viewable and available at 'PC World'.
Since I am not in England, I can't exactly verify that claim, but no such chips
exist at any computer retailer online or in person that I can find.
You're full of poo.
~daxe
PS..I presume there are 'rock' on Mars because I have seen pictures. When I see
a picture (at a public, 3rd party site) of a 360MB RAM chip for sale I will be
happy.