rec.autos.simulators

> But Steve:
> Is she really sitting too close to the wheel? I have heard that a racing
> car driver need a good elbow angle (90) to get the agility and speed
> needed for a racing car...

> And, since she is not wearing a helmet, maybe she took it off and put on
> the burka prior to the photo session? What do I know. A burka may even be
> very comfortable under a helemt... I would *think* that even moslems have
> the common sense to protect their head when racing. ;-)

> And, finally, what's wrong in racing a Lincoln LS? I am positively *sure*
> racing a racing specced Lincoln on the limit is huge fun, and I would do
> it without even thinking about the wage. Hehehe

> ---A---

>> Sorry, I didn't mean to veer into politics.  I just thought it amusing
>> that
>> an Iranian woman is being presented by the leftist BBC as "the new
>> Schumacher" sitting in a Lincoln LS, too close to the wheel and without a
>> helmet.  Sorry if I stepped on anybody's religious toes.

>>>>>1. If women can't drive on the street in these extremist lands, how

>> come

>>>>>it's okay to drive on race tracks?

>>>>Stop right there, pal! Iran is no more extremist than the USA in terms
>>>>of religion. I know because I've been to both counties.

>>>>Get your facts right before you start slagging off other cultures.

>>>And Ive been to Canada and Mexico.  That makes me an expert on religion
>>>in
>>>both Canada and Mexico?  I dont think so...

>>>Anyone with a modicum of COMMON SENSE can see you are so far off base
>>>that
>>>you cant even see the base anymore...

>>>Mitch
>>>--
>>>Remove "nospam." to reply.
>>>SuSE 9.2 Pro KDE 3.3.2a

>You can't decide what should be talked over and what should not, you know.
>Freedom of speech, you know. One of the things we praise, if not worship in the
>west.

>And what happens if everybody says the same thing, because the owners tell them
>to? What is the freedom of speech worth then?

>---A---

> Anyone interested in going into business? Selling fire-proof burkas?


> > But Steve:
> > Is she really sitting too close to the wheel? I have heard that a racing
> > car driver need a good elbow angle (90) to get the agility and speed
> > needed for a racing car...

> > And, since she is not wearing a helmet, maybe she took it off and put on
> > the burka prior to the photo session? What do I know. A burka may even
be
> > very comfortable under a helemt... I would *think* that even moslems
have
> > the common sense to protect their head when racing. ;-)

> > And, finally, what's wrong in racing a Lincoln LS? I am positively
*sure*
> > racing a racing specced Lincoln on the limit is huge fun, and I would do
> > it without even thinking about the wage. Hehehe

> > ---A---

> >> Sorry, I didn't mean to veer into politics.  I just thought it amusing
> >> that
> >> an Iranian woman is being presented by the leftist BBC as "the new
> >> Schumacher" sitting in a Lincoln LS, too close to the wheel and without
a
> >> helmet.  Sorry if I stepped on anybody's religious toes.

> >>>>>1. If women can't drive on the street in these extremist lands, how

> >> come

> >>>>>it's okay to drive on race tracks?

> >>>>Stop right there, pal! Iran is no more extremist than the USA in terms
> >>>>of religion. I know because I've been to both counties.

> >>>>Get your facts right before you start slagging off other cultures.

> >>>And Ive been to Canada and Mexico.  That makes me an expert on religion
> >>>in
> >>>both Canada and Mexico?  I dont think so...

> >>>Anyone with a modicum of COMMON SENSE can see you are so far off base
> >>>that
> >>>you cant even see the base anymore...

> >>>Mitch
> >>>--
> >>>Remove "nospam." to reply.
> >>>SuSE 9.2 Pro KDE 3.3.2a

> Sorry, I didn't mean to veer into politics.  I just thought it amusing that
> an Iranian woman is being presented by the leftist BBC as "the new
> Schumacher" sitting in a Lincoln LS, too close to the wheel and without a
> helmet.  Sorry if I stepped on anybody's religious toes.

> > Sorry, I didn't mean to veer into politics.  I just thought it amusing
that
> > an Iranian woman is being presented by the leftist BBC as "the new
> > Schumacher" sitting in a Lincoln LS, too close to the wheel and without
a
> > helmet.  Sorry if I stepped on anybody's religious toes.

> Post-emasculation by our "new labour" (= "old tory"), I'd struggle to
> think of our beloved Auntie as "leftist" :-)

> Yeah, well, they refuse to call suicide bombers by their rightful
> monikers,
> instead naming them "freedom enthusiasts" or "Valhalla aspirants" or some
> such rubbish.  They had to jettison one of their directors recently for
> making unfounded allegations that Blair had knowingly misled the Brits
> abt.
> Iraq (the suicide scientist).  The crack that he's Bush's "poodle" is
> closer
> to the mark.  There now; I've done it - stepped in poo (politics).  Yes,
> the
> Bebe is left of center, as is most of the U.S. media (NYT, CBS), with the
> notable exceptions of Fox and radio (exc. Clear Channel).  We're very,
> very
> opinionated over here, but not stupid.

>> > Sorry, I didn't mean to veer into politics.  I just thought it amusing
> that
>> > an Iranian woman is being presented by the leftist BBC as "the new
>> > Schumacher" sitting in a Lincoln LS, too close to the wheel and without
> a
>> > helmet.  Sorry if I stepped on anybody's religious toes.

>> Post-emasculation by our "new labour" (= "old tory"), I'd struggle to
>> think of our beloved Auntie as "leftist" :-)

> oh come on Steve - left of centre in the US is extreme right in Europe -
now
> there, you got me involved! CBS left? CBs had the countdown to the bombing
> of Baghdad with their anchors salivating at the thought of the bombs
> falling - they are as left as Hitler was a National Socialist!


> > Yeah, well, they refuse to call suicide bombers by their rightful
> > monikers,
> > instead naming them "freedom enthusiasts" or "Valhalla aspirants" or
some
> > such rubbish.  They had to jettison one of their directors recently for
> > making unfounded allegations that Blair had knowingly misled the Brits
> > abt.
> > Iraq (the suicide scientist).  The crack that he's Bush's "poodle" is
> > closer
> > to the mark.  There now; I've done it - stepped in poo (politics).  Yes,
> > the
> > Bebe is left of center, as is most of the U.S. media (NYT, CBS), with
the
> > notable exceptions of Fox and radio (exc. Clear Channel).  We're very,
> > very
> > opinionated over here, but not stupid.

> >> > Sorry, I didn't mean to veer into politics.  I just thought it
amusing
> > that
> >> > an Iranian woman is being presented by the leftist BBC as "the new
> >> > Schumacher" sitting in a Lincoln LS, too close to the wheel and
without
> > a
> >> > helmet.  Sorry if I stepped on anybody's religious toes.

> >> Post-emasculation by our "new labour" (= "old tory"), I'd struggle to
> >> think of our beloved Auntie as "leftist" :-)

> Two words, Alex: Gunga Dan (as in "What's the frequency, Kenneth?"  Oh,
> that's right, he's gone.  I wonder why....  Could it be SATAN?)

>> oh come on Steve - left of centre in the US is extreme right in Europe -
> now
>> there, you got me involved! CBS left? CBs had the countdown to the
>> bombing
>> of Baghdad with their anchors salivating at the thought of the bombs
>> falling - they are as left as Hitler was a National Socialist!


>> > Yeah, well, they refuse to call suicide bombers by their rightful
>> > monikers,
>> > instead naming them "freedom enthusiasts" or "Valhalla aspirants" or
> some
>> > such rubbish.  They had to jettison one of their directors recently for
>> > making unfounded allegations that Blair had knowingly misled the Brits
>> > abt.
>> > Iraq (the suicide scientist).  The crack that he's Bush's "poodle" is
>> > closer
>> > to the mark.  There now; I've done it - stepped in poo (politics).
>> > Yes,
>> > the
>> > Bebe is left of center, as is most of the U.S. media (NYT, CBS), with
> the
>> > notable exceptions of Fox and radio (exc. Clear Channel).  We're very,
>> > very
>> > opinionated over here, but not stupid.

>> >> > Sorry, I didn't mean to veer into politics.  I just thought it
> amusing
>> > that
>> >> > an Iranian woman is being presented by the leftist BBC as "the new
>> >> > Schumacher" sitting in a Lincoln LS, too close to the wheel and
> without
>> > a
>> >> > helmet.  Sorry if I stepped on anybody's religious toes.

>> >> Post-emasculation by our "new labour" (= "old tory"), I'd struggle to
>> >> think of our beloved Auntie as "leftist" :-)

>We're very, very
>opinionated over here, but not stupid.

> Yeah, well, they refuse to call suicide bombers by their rightful monikers,
> instead naming them "freedom enthusiasts" or "Valhalla aspirants" or some
> such rubbish.  They had to jettison one of their directors recently for
> making unfounded allegations that Blair had knowingly misled the Brits abt.
> Iraq (the suicide scientist).

> > Yeah, well, they refuse to call suicide bombers by their rightful
monikers,
> > instead naming them "freedom enthusiasts" or "Valhalla aspirants" or
some
> > such rubbish.  They had to jettison one of their directors recently for
> > making unfounded allegations that Blair had knowingly misled the Brits
abt.
> > Iraq (the suicide scientist).

> Well, I'd certainly have chosen a word other than "unfounded" - in
> politics more so than anywhere else there's no smoke without fire.***
> actually quit, but primarily in order that the BBC could undergo its own
> reform.

> I'd hate to line in a country where the BBC was "reformed" by new
> labour. We get all the news that's approved to hear by either Tony or
> Rupert. Still, if that were the case I'm sure we'd have "found" WMD in
> Iraq, Dr. Kelly would have been ***ed by Al Quaeda, and the French
> wouldn't have won the world cup.

> One man's freedom fighter and all that....

>No, John, unless yer deaf, dumb, blind and amoral, there are differences of
>both degree and kind between terrorists like the ones who blew up the school
>children in Beslan and the "Freedom Fighters" who took back their country in
>Ukraine and are attempting to do so in Lebanon, despite the
>politically-correct non-stance the BBC is trying to indoctrinate its
>audience to believe.  In you, it seems, they've succeeded.  Hmmmpf!

> No, John, unless yer deaf, dumb, blind and amoral, there are differences of
> both degree and kind between terrorists like the ones who blew up the school
> children in Beslan and the "Freedom Fighters" who took back their country in
> Ukraine and are attempting to do so in Lebanon, despite the
> politically-correct non-stance the BBC is trying to indoctrinate its
> audience to believe.  In you, it seems, they've succeeded.  Hmmmpf!

> What rubbish!
> Wronged in whose eyes?

> > .....one incident does not change any entire country into terrorists.
They
> are still the wronged.