http://www.racesimcentral.net/
http://www.racesimcentral.net/
http://www.racesimcentral.net/
http://www.racesimcentral.net/
keep in mind, Forza 2 runs at 60 FRAMES PER SECOND, twice the framerate
of the original Xbox game, twice the framerate of PGR3 on the same
machine, Xbox 360, rendered at 720p resolution with 4x anti-aliasing,
uses some advanced lighting techniques, some per-pixel effects and will
be a far better racing game than PGR3 could ever hope to be.
Keep in my the OP is a bozo that doesn't know the difference between
in game graphics and replays.
--
Andrew, contact via http://interpleb.googlepages.com
Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim replies to quote only relevant text.
Check groups.google.com before asking an obvious question.
> >keep in mind, Forza 2 runs at 60 FRAMES PER SECOND, twice the framerate
> >of the original Xbox game, twice the framerate of PGR3 on the same
> >machine, Xbox 360, rendered at 720p resolution with 4x anti-aliasing,
> >uses some advanced lighting techniques, some per-pixel effects and will
> >be a far better racing game than PGR3 could ever hope to be.
> Keep in my the OP is a bozo that doesn't know the difference between
> in game graphics and replays.
Eh ?
GT3 on the PS2 looks fantastic during replays. The actual in game
graphics are a pixellated low texture nightmare. Same for practically
any other decent driving games of recent years. The pictures in the
OP's message are obviously pre-rendered or replay footage.
--
Andrew, contact via http://interpleb.googlepages.com
Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim replies to quote only relevant text.
Check groups.google.com before asking an obvious question.
>> Because everyone knows that replays are all pre-rendered and don't use
>> in-game graphics...
> GT3 on the PS2 looks fantastic during replays. The actual in game
> graphics are a pixellated low texture nightmare. Same for practically
> any other decent driving games of recent years. The pictures in the
> OP's message are obviously pre-rendered or replay footage.
>> Because everyone knows that replays are all pre-rendered and don't use
>> in-game graphics...
> GT3 on the PS2 looks fantastic during replays. The actual in game
> graphics are a pixellated low texture nightmare. Same for practically
> any other decent driving games of recent years. The pictures in the
> OP's message are obviously pre-rendered or replay footage.
--
http://myspace.com/zomoniac
> >keep in mind, Forza 2 runs at 60 FRAMES PER SECOND, twice the framerate
> >of the original Xbox game, twice the framerate of PGR3 on the same
> >machine, Xbox 360, rendered at 720p resolution with 4x anti-aliasing,
> >uses some advanced lighting techniques, some per-pixel effects and will
> >be a far better racing game than PGR3 could ever hope to be.
> Keep in my the OP is a bozo that doesn't know the difference between
> in game graphics and replays.
> --
--
Paul (Neurotic to the bone No doubt about it)
------------------------------------------------------
Stop and Look
http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/
> >> Because everyone knows that replays are all pre-rendered and don't use
> >> in-game graphics...
> > GT3 on the PS2 looks fantastic during replays. The actual in game
> > graphics are a pixellated low texture nightmare. Same for practically
> > any other decent driving games of recent years. The pictures in the
> > OP's message are obviously pre-rendered or replay footage.
> On my copy of GT3/C/4P/4 the replays look like in-game, only from a
> different angle. Cars in GT look hi-res and stunning, even in game.
> --
> http://myspace.com/zomoniac
>>keep in mind, Forza 2 runs at 60 FRAMES PER SECOND, twice the framerate
>>of the original Xbox game, twice the framerate of PGR3 on the same
>>machine, Xbox 360, rendered at 720p resolution with 4x anti-aliasing,
>>uses some advanced lighting techniques, some per-pixel effects and will
>>be a far better racing game than PGR3 could ever hope to be.
>Keep in my the OP is a bozo that doesn't know the difference between
>in game graphics and replays.
gamertag: Chrisflynnuk
http://live.xbox.com/member/Chrisflynnuk
Current eBay auctions: http://tinyurl.com/hutcb
come again? :)
--
gt: redsmartie
www.redsmartie.com
"Game experience may change during online play"
> http://forzamotorsport.net/090506-1.htm
> keep in mind, Forza 2 runs at 60 FRAMES PER SECOND, twice the framerate
> of the original Xbox game, twice the framerate of PGR3 on the same
> machine, Xbox 360, rendered at 720p resolution with 4x anti-aliasing,
> uses some advanced lighting techniques, some per-pixel effects and will
> be a far better racing game than PGR3 could ever hope to be.
- Richard Hutnik
> >keep in mind, Forza 2 runs at 60 FRAMES PER SECOND, twice the framerate
> >of the original Xbox game, twice the framerate of PGR3 on the same
> >machine, Xbox 360, rendered at 720p resolution with 4x anti-aliasing,
> >uses some advanced lighting techniques, some per-pixel effects and will
> >be a far better racing game than PGR3 could ever hope to be.
> Keep in my the OP is a bozo that doesn't know the difference between
> in game graphics and replays.
> --
> >>keep in mind, Forza 2 runs at 60 FRAMES PER SECOND, twice the framerate
> >>of the original Xbox game, twice the framerate of PGR3 on the same
> >>machine, Xbox 360, rendered at 720p resolution with 4x anti-aliasing,
> >>uses some advanced lighting techniques, some per-pixel effects and will
> >>be a far better racing game than PGR3 could ever hope to be.
> >Keep in my the OP is a bozo that doesn't know the difference between
> >in game graphics and replays.
> yeah, but a replay is still using the ingame grapgics engine, is it
> not?
> --
> > http://forzamotorsport.net/090506-1.htm
> > keep in mind, Forza 2 runs at 60 FRAMES PER SECOND, twice the framerate
> > of the original Xbox game, twice the framerate of PGR3 on the same
> > machine, Xbox 360, rendered at 720p resolution with 4x anti-aliasing,
> > uses some advanced lighting techniques, some per-pixel effects and will
> > be a far better racing game than PGR3 could ever hope to be.
> Those pictures are not THAT impressive at all. It is all going to come
> down to gameplay anyhow. It isn't the same league as the prerendered
> they did at E3. And while it may use 4x anti-aliasing, the pics did
> have jaggies in them.
> - Richard Hutnik
framerate is king because it directly effects gameplay, sense of speed
and immersion.
>>>> Because everyone knows that replays are all pre-rendered and don't use
>>>> in-game graphics...
>>> GT3 on the PS2 looks fantastic during replays. The actual in game
>>> graphics are a pixellated low texture nightmare. Same for practically
>>> any other decent driving games of recent years. The pictures in the
>>> OP's message are obviously pre-rendered or replay footage.
>> On my copy of GT3/C/4P/4 the replays look like in-game, only from a
>> different angle. Cars in GT look hi-res and stunning, even in game.
>> --
>> http://myspace.com/zomoniac
> I think 4 and maybe 3, and as I mentioned Forza are all pretty good at
> just looking very pretty in both live and replay.
--
http://myspace.com/zomoniac
