> I know I should buy the stuff online
> - but to me that raises other questions about supporting local
> industry (and not wanting to support those countries whose economies
> rely on selling arms to the third world - I've just finished reading
> John Pilger's excellent Hidden Agendas <g>).
I don't think that Papyrus are involved in the arms trade. I also doubt that any
of the trivial amount of money that you spend on buying N2/ICR2/N99 would end up
any where the arms trade - don't tar the whole of the US and UK with the same
brush. Like Australia doesn't export arms and related equipment! Besides you
have already spent money on GPL a good proportion of which has wound up in US
hands.
You may not accept the above arguments and may wish to boycott the makers of the
finest simulation software in the world - fine - you only m***alternative is
to not race on these new tracks. Remember the old adage "Two wrongs do not make
a right". Punishing Papyrus for the sins of the arms trade through piracy
doesn't exactly seem just to me. Besides why does it matter when this excellant
software was developed? You are happy to benefit from the work that the crew at
the Pits do for nothing (and they come from non-Australian arms exporting
countries) but you baulk at rewarding the large amounts of effort put in by
essentially similarly motivated people (the staff at Papyrus). Let's apply
Immanual Kant's ethical formula to this one - "how would it be if everyone did
this?" - easy, Papyrus would go broke and GPL would be the last quality
simulation for quite some time.
Ho, hum.....buy it or wait until an Australian company develop a simulation of
equivalent quality, which, if everyone were to apply your morality about
supporting local industry, will fail in the market place because Australia's
market is not big enough to support such a niche product.
Cheers,
Paul