rec.autos.simulators

RSC and their mods

Byron Forbe

RSC and their mods

by Byron Forbe » Wed, 24 Aug 2005 23:20:39




>> But as the most visible site in the sim racing community, you don't
>> think they shoulder a responsibility to be professional, impartial,
>> non-hypocritical, and non-confrontational?  I do.

>>          John DiFool

>   I don't.  So there.  Where does this need for a big emotional hug from
> RSC come from.  Alright.  All you belly achers...which ones DIDN'T get
> *** fed as babies?  There has got to be a logical reason for this NEED
> to be validated.

> dave henrie

> going ..going..

    Well, the birds of certain feathers seem to be flocking together dont
they?
Byron Forbe

RSC and their mods

by Byron Forbe » Wed, 24 Aug 2005 23:35:08


    Speaking of hard to understand, that first sentence is a doozy.

    I, and many others, fail to understand the use of the warning. Some
clown said you were basically using it just because it's there in the
software - no need to follow in the footsteps of the fools who put it in
there!

    What purpose does it serve exactly? It probably just makes that person
more interesting if anything - they'd have to be more likely to post
something good and juicy! I mean, what are other users supposed to do? Stay
away from them? Not read their posts? Oh, I'd better stay away from his
links else I might end up with some really good, free software?

    You must be off your ***ing head!

    Ok, so anyone posting a link to anything needs to get a supreme court
ruling that it is not copyrighted - no worries :)

    RSC policy - never give members the benefit of the doubt and pass up an
opportunity to weild the big, yellow stick!

John DiFoo

RSC and their mods

by John DiFoo » Thu, 25 Aug 2005 08:22:16

On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 09:22:46 -0400, John DiFool


>On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 23:45:25 -0500, Dave Henrie



>>> But as the most visible site in the sim racing community, you don't
>>> think they shoulder a responsibility to be professional, impartial,
>>> non-hypocritical, and non-confrontational?  I do.

>>>          John DiFool

>>   I don't.  So there.  Where does this need for a big emotional hug from
>>RSC come from.  Alright.  All you belly achers...which ones DIDN'T get
>>*** fed as babies?  There has got to be a logical reason for this NEED
>>to be validated.  

>>dave henrie

>>going ..going..

>Straw man.  My point was, that, as the most visible and most commonly
>visited sim site on the planet, that it doesn't show either them or
>the
>community in a good light if certain moderators engage in questionable
>behaviors.  This is a likely route to either irrelevance or oblivion
>(for some community members, RSC has indeed started to become
>irrelevant).

>Imagine if an organization in a real-world community somewhere,
>an organization which has a very high profile there and is able to
>serve certain needs for its community, started to get all pissy and
>obnoxious in certain respects.  You don't think the community
>members would have a right to be annoyed?

And while I'm at it...

My only point here is this: when someone in the community does
something, does it benefit the community, or does it harm it?  And
the higher the profile/influence of the party in question, the
greater their effect on things, for good or ill:

In this vein I see the release of rFactor as being a very good
thing.  It will bring together racers who formerly probably
never did anything together and had little in common.

Likewise, all that First/iRacing stuff didn't do the community
any good at all.  To name just one thing, it was probably a
contributing factor to the low number of people who signed
up for the recently-canceled Nurby 24 Hours for the GTP
mod (as a number of people have publicly said that the
First fiasco turned them off to racing NR2003).

Say someone visits RSC for the first time, lurks around and
sees a huge flame war where the mods are just fueling the fire.
His conclusion is likely that he won't be wanting to associate
with ANYONE, on both sides-thus we just lost a potential
member of our racing fellowship.

         JD


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.