rec.autos.simulators

>> Maybe I should start a class action lawsuit to get them to
>> stop this behavior ...

>   maybe you should grow up.  RSC provides a huge benefit to the COMMUNITY.
> Your feelings got hurt.  Toooooo Bad.  RSC is owned and operated by
> somebody who is not you or me.  They can do whatever the heck they want.
> If I find something that is incorrect, I challenge it.  If I get warned,
> then fine.  BFD.  I think I've had a warning on there for a year or more.
> I don't even know what it is or what it's for.  Who cares?
>  If you can show ME that your lawsuit can benefit ME more than all the
> info and dloads provided FREE by RSC then go ahead,  Start listing.
> Until such time that YOU can show just what amazing things you can
> contribute to the sim community, I'd strongly recomend you just shut up.

>  I don't know what your beef with RSC is about, I don't care.  I find it
> hugely amusing that you think you have rights on the internet.  They are
> uploading kiddie ***,***films, terrorist communications, and on and
> on
> and on.  And you feel you have a greivance worthy of a court's time?  Good
> God man...did they post pictures of your mother and a goat?

> I rarely get this crude but I do so for your benefit.  Hopefully it will
> get through to you.  Come back when you have some hair down there.  We'll
> wait the 5 or 6 years.

>> You cared enough to respond. It should be obviouse that
>> my beef is that that RSC attaches warning avatars to peoples posts,
>> and that quite often, the warnings are undeserved. In my
>> case, the RSC moderators first ignored, then over-reacted to my
>> private emails about receiving and public posting of warning.

>  No I don't care.  I can't imagine what could be so gosh darned important
> that your self-worth is impugned.

> I DO know that I myself and hundreds if not thousands of others get
> immense
> benefits from RSC.  So they can be as rude as they like.  I only know that
> your actions, for whatever reason you feel compelled to undertake, can
> only
> harm me.  I'm not defending RSC, I'm not intellectually curious enough to
> even briefly examine the merits of either side.

> For pity's sake...it's a freekin' Race Sim site.  It's not a publisher of
> scientific thesi.

> dave henrie

>> I used jeffr. My profile includes my real name, and a link to
>> my web page (http://jeffareid.net), which also includes my real
>> name and email address.

> Well, I doubt if you would have had much of a case. Was your standing
> reduced in the eyes of right thinking people? Probably not.

>> Nothing in the rules at RSC or the agreement when you join gives them
>> permission to publicly attach warning avatars to every post you make.

> It's a private forum that you chose to participate in voluntarily.  The
> administrators and moderators of the site can run it however they see
> fit, and if you don't like it you can either deal with them personally
> or go somewhere else.

>>>>Did you post under your real name?

>>>I used jeffr. My profile includes my real name, and a link to
>>>my web page (http://jeffareid.net), which also includes my real
>>>name and email address.

>>Well, I doubt if you would have had much of a case. Was your standing
>>reduced in the eyes of right thinking people? Probably not.

>     Not just defamation anyway - it's becoming discrimination. They seem to
> be insisting he agree to being treated illegaly or they'll ban him. The
> whole idiotic system is akin to Nazis puting yellow ribbons on the arms of
> Jews! All they need to do is issue private warnings and bans - sounds like a
> bunch of kids on silly little parts of the learning curve to me. Another
> stupid little police state!

>>>Nothing in the rules at RSC or the agreement when you join gives them
>>>permission to publicly attach warning avatars to every post you make.
>>>In my experience these are handed out on a "assumed guilty until
>>>proven innocent" basis, they aren't fair, and violate their own rule:

>>>"4.1 - Any content that is false, abusive, defamatory, or harassing
>>>is not permitted."

>>>Every warning avatar attached by RSC is "content that is abusive and
>>>harassing". In my case they were also "false and defamatory".

>>Maybe I should start a class action lawsuit to get them to
>>stop this behavior ...

>     Sounds like now they may be guilty of discrimination also. :)

>     Sounds pretty stupid to me. They must be a bunch of***heads - all they
> need to do is respond to complaints. Imagine what sort of a no life ***wit
> you'd have to be to screen every post on those forums - LOL.

>     Sounds like a league director that screens entire race replays looking
> for incidents instead of waiting for drivers to protest.

>>> Nothing in the rules at RSC or the agreement when you join gives
>>> them permission to publicly attach warning avatars to every post you
>>> make. In my experience these are handed out on a "assumed guilty
>>> until proven innocent" basis, they aren't fair, and violate their
>>> own rule:

>>> "4.1 - Any content that is false, abusive, defamatory, or harassing
>>> is not permitted."

>>> Every warning avatar attached by RSC is "content that is abusive and
>>> harassing". In my case they were also "false and defamatory".

>> Maybe I should start a class action lawsuit to get them to
>> stop this behavior ...

>     Sounds like now they may be guilty of discrimination also. :)

>     Sounds pretty stupid to me. They must be a bunch of***heads -
>     all they
> need to do is respond to complaints. Imagine what sort of a no life
> ***wit you'd have to be to screen every post on those forums - LOL.

>     Sounds like a league director that screens entire race replays
>     looking
> for incidents instead of waiting for drivers to protest.