> Terry deserved it ? Terry should have burned the tires off in the last
> corner to keep # 3 off his back side !
Mark
> >It was a typical Dale Earnahardt cheapshot. There was no reason for it. I
> >personally think it should revert back to the pervious lap.
> >Chris
> And nothing said about Terry getting into Dale the prtevious lap, right?
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Dave Starr
> Professional Shop Rat - 34 years in an Auto Plant
> www.tir.com./~destarr Pictures & stuff
Eldred
__
Put your message in a modem, and throw it in the ***-sea...
remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
> >The intimidator is BACK !!!!!!! The reason was to WIN !!! Revert to the
> >previous lap ? Hang on to that dream PAL
>!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> >> Chris
!
!
> >!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> >> It was a typical Dale Earnahardt cheapshot. There was no reason for
it.
> >I
> >> personally think it should revert back to the pervious lap.
> >I heard the booing. You'd have thought it was Jeff Gordon ;)
> >I wonder if NASCAR will penalize him. If so I really can't see how it
> >will make things better other than taking it away from Earnhardt.
> >Spencer would win - Terry deserved it. Another close one for Tony
> >Stewart...
> >David Cook
> >> Gee, I didn't mean to wreck Terry. Yea, right. Maybe they should
take a lap
> >> or two away and let Dale sit for a couple of races. Nascar took two
laps away
> >> from someone for running in to the back of Jarrett when he was going
slow.
> >> Earnhardt wrecks too many people and should have to pay. Did you hear
all the
> >> boo's?
> >> Don
Chris
--
See ya in the pits,
Dean
I have a terrible memory. In fact my memory's so bad I can't remember how
long it's been since I've forgotten anything.
> >Terry deserved it ? Terry should have burned the tires off in the last
> >corner to keep # 3 off his back side !
> That also surprised me. As quickly as Terry went by, DE shouldn't have
been
> able to get CLOSE enough to spin him...
> Eldred
> __
> Put your message in a modem, and throw it in the ***-sea...
> remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
Well, according to Earnhardt fans, Jeff Gordon made him crash at Daytona in
1997. So, he's gotten his own share of hits.
Racer X
Veteran Sim Racer
Victory Lane-
http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Speedway/1423/
I thought that Earnhardt himself said in a post race interview that it was
totally his fault that he crashed. He let his car drift out and get into
Gordon coming out of turn 2 he said.
Dan Belcher
Team Racing Unlimited
Come on..it was one of those racing deals.
Get a grip on it. They all want to win and have most probably done similar. Did
you not see Spencer remind Rudd of this in the
post race interview??
DE didnt try to wreck Terry on purpose.
If you were around years ago, you would remember the Allisons, Jr., Cale,
Buddy,Pearson and Petty racing real hard at one time or another. Turn your
little clocks back--this is how it was and will be.
For you "revisionists" who want to turn everything back--to the last lap,
re-write the history books or whatever, cowboy up--its life. History and racing
happens because
it happened when it did--not because we want things "to be right." We cannot
right every wrong or vice versa.
If you were not around during the past(old) NASCAR years, grab a tape or book
and
study it. Educate yourselves. These hard racing deals are not new--just
exciting!!!
471
Over the past couple of years we have seen NASCAR trying to clean up the
rough and tumble image and go more "corprate".
The question NASCAR must answer is whether or not this is good for the image
they are trying to market to their fans. Based on the ESPN survey I saw on
the website and the thunderous booing from the stands, I would say it is not
a good thing for NASCAR.
What can they do about it? Not much, IMHO.
There is a history of letting race results stand for much worse infractions
than we saw last night. Trick engine parts, out of spec spoilers and the
like. I can't remember the last time somebody lost a race win for a rules
violation. Anybody?
Mark
> Over the past couple of years we have seen NASCAR trying to clean up the
> rough and tumble image and go more "corprate".
> The question NASCAR must answer is whether or not this is good for the image
> they are trying to market to their fans. Based on the ESPN survey I saw on
> the website and the thunderous booing from the stands, I would say it is not
> a good thing for NASCAR.
> What can they do about it? Not much, IMHO.
> There is a history of letting race results stand for much worse infractions
> than we saw last night. Trick engine parts, out of spec spoilers and the
> like. I can't remember the last time somebody lost a race win for a rules
> violation. Anybody?
> > People, People:
> > Come on..it was one of those racing deals.
> > Get a grip on it. They all want to win and have most probably done
> similar. Did
> > you not see Spencer remind Rudd of this in the
> > post race interview??
> > DE didnt try to wreck Terry on purpose.
> > If you were around years ago, you would remember the Allisons, Jr., Cale,
> > Buddy,Pearson and Petty racing real hard at one time or another. Turn your
> > little clocks back--this is how it was and will be.
> > For you "revisionists" who want to turn everything back--to the last lap,
> > re-write the history books or whatever, cowboy up--its life. History and
> racing
> > happens because
> > it happened when it did--not because we want things "to be right." We
> cannot
> > right every wrong or vice versa.
> > If you were not around during the past(old) NASCAR years, grab a tape or
> book
> > and
> > study it. Educate yourselves. These hard racing deals are not new--just
> > exciting!!!
> > 471
