rec.autos.simulators

Requirements for F1 grand prix 2.0

Ville Kop

Requirements for F1 grand prix 2.0

by Ville Kop » Wed, 13 Dec 1995 04:00:00

Im too afraid to even think about them. But if they arent able to optimize the code better I
think it would need atleast a pentium or DX4 to run it even in VGA. I certainly hope that the
performance of the game in earlier demos will be improved to the finished game.

--


      - Second place is first of the losers.(Ron Dennis) -

Michael Haydo

Requirements for F1 grand prix 2.0

by Michael Haydo » Wed, 13 Dec 1995 04:00:00

Does anyone know what the hardware requirements will probably be for Formula
one grand prix II?
PeterT

Requirements for F1 grand prix 2.0

by PeterT » Thu, 14 Dec 1995 04:00:00

According to Microprose the requirements are as follows:
  -486DX2-66 minimum
  -8 MEG memory
  -Double speed CD-ROM  drive

BUT!!...........I've heard many things about why it isn't out yet and the
one that keeps popping up is that it can't run on anything less than a P90
because the frame rate is only at about 15 on a P75 with 125% processor
occupancy.

I feel that Crammond is resisting SH-M's (Spectrum Holobyte-Microprose)
urging to tone the game down and release it now because he wants it
perfect.  Considering how good the first one was with the hardware he had
to work with, I feel that it is worth the wait.  Besides, is anybody
really sick of playing the best and most classic racing sim of all
time--F1GP--yet??

I Sucked Up a Ford Tod

Requirements for F1 grand prix 2.0

by I Sucked Up a Ford Tod » Fri, 15 Dec 1995 04:00:00

[snip]
Yep I am sick of playing it.  As soon as Nascar came out, it took over
as being the best sim and this is what I spend my racing time on.  

Patrick L. Dots

Requirements for F1 grand prix 2.0

by Patrick L. Dots » Wed, 20 Dec 1995 04:00:00



>According to Microprose the requirements are as follows:
>  -486DX2-66 minimum
>  -8 MEG memory
>  -Double speed CD-ROM  drive

>BUT!!...........I've heard many things about why it isn't out yet and the
>one that keeps popping up is that it can't run on anything less than a P90
>because the frame rate is only at about 15 on a P75 with 125% processor
>occupancy.

>I feel that Crammond is resisting SH-M's (Spectrum Holobyte-Microprose)
>urging to tone the game down and release it now because he wants it
>perfect.  Considering how good the first one was with the hardware he had
>to work with, I feel that it is worth the wait.  Besides, is anybody
>really sick of playing the best and most classic racing sim of all
>time--F1GP--yet??

Yea, it sucks so bad I deleted from my hard drive!  It feels more like
driving a hovercraft than a race car.  It was good three years ago but
Indycar made it obsolete.  Now, after Nascar and ICR2, its not even
worth playing.
R. van Ri

Requirements for F1 grand prix 2.0

by R. van Ri » Thu, 21 Dec 1995 04:00:00




>>According to Microprose the requirements are as follows:
>>  -486DX2-66 minimum
>>  -8 MEG memory
>>  -Double speed CD-ROM  drive

>>BUT!!...........I've heard many things about why it isn't out yet and the
>>one that keeps popping up is that it can't run on anything less than a P90
>>because the frame rate is only at about 15 on a P75 with 125% processor
>>occupancy.

>>I feel that Crammond is resisting SH-M's (Spectrum Holobyte-Microprose)
>>urging to tone the game down and release it now because he wants it
>>perfect.  Considering how good the first one was with the hardware he had
>>to work with, I feel that it is worth the wait.  Besides, is anybody
>>really sick of playing the best and most classic racing sim of all
>>time--F1GP--yet??
>Yea, it sucks so bad I deleted from my hard drive!  It feels more like
>driving a hovercraft than a race car.  It was good three years ago but
>Indycar made it obsolete.  Now, after Nascar and ICR2, its not even
>worth playing.

Nascar sucks. Nobody likes to drive in circles.
Indy II is fun. But the world is waiting for the stunning graphics
from gp2. And F1GP is one of the best racing games if you play it with
2 players.
Pasi Rahikain

Requirements for F1 grand prix 2.0

by Pasi Rahikain » Thu, 21 Dec 1995 04:00:00


Indycar made is obsolete ? never. Original F1GP is much better than indycar.
Maybe not graphically, but the feel of driving is great in F1GP.
Nascar looks great in SVGA and driving ain't bad either, but the tracks suck.
It's really boring to drive those circles with absolutely no gear changes
needed...

Haven't seen ICR2 yet, but after seeing GP2 movie, I'm sure that NO WAY any
other racing game is going to top it

--
************************************************************************
** Pasi Rahikainen **    "It's better to burn out than to fade away!" **

************************************************************************

Iv

Requirements for F1 grand prix 2.0

by Iv » Sat, 23 Dec 1995 04:00:00


( about F1GP : )
Sure, lets talk dirty about F1GP. IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT THEN SHUT UP !!!
That you don't like the game ( because your playing on a 286 12MHz
machine ) is allright with me, but don't start telling stupid things like
"ICR(2) is better" and even worse "Nascar is great". Latter two games are
nothing in comparisson of F1GP 2 !!! (na na na na na na, I,ve got myself
a demo !!! :-)) ) Just wait until you see that one, probably the same
things happen to ya as happend to me. If you would like to taste a bit of
the superiority of THE GAME, look the movie and you'll be convinsed !!!

Until then, keep weeping over ICR(2) and Nas. ( I really feel sorry for
ya )

Iv.

Michel de Roo

Requirements for F1 grand prix 2.0

by Michel de Roo » Sat, 23 Dec 1995 04:00:00





>>>According to Microprose the requirements are as follows:
>>>  -486DX2-66 minimum
>>>  -8 MEG memory
>>>  -Double speed CD-ROM  drive

>>>BUT!!...........I've heard many things about why it isn't out yet and the
>>>one that keeps popping up is that it can't run on anything less than a P90
>>>because the frame rate is only at about 15 on a P75 with 125% processor
>>>occupancy.

>>>I feel that Crammond is resisting SH-M's (Spectrum Holobyte-Microprose)
>>>urging to tone the game down and release it now because he wants it
>>>perfect.  Considering how good the first one was with the hardware he had
>>>to work with, I feel that it is worth the wait.  Besides, is anybody
>>>really sick of playing the best and most classic racing sim of all
>>>time--F1GP--yet??
>>Yea, it sucks so bad I deleted from my hard drive!  It feels more like
>>driving a hovercraft than a race car.  It was good three years ago but
>>Indycar made it obsolete.  Now, after Nascar and ICR2, its not even
>>worth playing.
>Nascar sucks. Nobody likes to drive in circles.
>Indy II is fun. But the world is waiting for the stunning graphics
>from gp2. And F1GP is one of the best racing games if you play it with
>2 players.

Fact is that racing fanatics are being served well nowadays. How about
Sega's decision to convert Saturn shit to PC games (you just need an
Diamond Edge, that's all).  So, how about a modem/network linked
version of Sega Rally, of Sega's Daytona USA ?
Scurvyd

Requirements for F1 grand prix 2.0

by Scurvyd » Sat, 23 Dec 1995 04:00:00


>nothing in comparisson of F1GP 2 !!! (na na na na na na, I,ve got
myself
>a demo !!! :-)) ) Just wait until you see that one, probably the
same
>things happen to ya as happend to me. If you would like to taste a
bit of
>the superiority of THE GAME, look the movie and you'll be
convinsed !!!

>Until then, keep weeping over ICR(2) and Nas. ( I really feel
sorry for
>ya )

  You got a demo eh, yeah right and I have Earnhardt and Gordon
coming over tonight to give me driving tips !

I also d/l the movie and was impressed enough i'll probably buy
the sim despite the many delays, but as far as blowing away
icr2 and Nascar....get real.  I'd say it all depends on what type
of racing you enjoy the most.

SD

Michal Kadlc

Requirements for F1 grand prix 2.0

by Michal Kadlc » Sat, 23 Dec 1995 04:00:00

: Sure, lets talk dirty about F1GP. IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT THEN SHUT UP !!!
: That you don't like the game ( because your playing on a 286 12MHz
: machine ) is allright with me, but don't start telling stupid things like
: "ICR(2) is better" and even worse "Nascar is great". Latter two games are
: nothing in comparisson of F1GP 2 !!! (na na na na na na, I,ve got myself
: a demo !!! :-)) ) Just wait until you see that one, probably the same
: things happen to ya as happend to me. If you would like to taste a bit of
: the superiority of THE GAME, look the movie and you'll be convinsed !!!

: Until then, keep weeping over ICR(2) and Nas. ( I really feel sorry for
: ya )

: Iv.

  Man, do you know what the words "physics model" mean?????   SH doesn't!!!!

  Papyrus doesn't make a F1 sim only because they don't wanna make MP
look like babies!

Have a good day.

--
#-------------------------------------------------#
#  Laurin & Klement Racing - PRO95                #
#                                                 #
#  #58 David Kadlcak                              #
#                                                 #
#  #59 Michal Kadlcak                             #
#-------------------------------------------------#

Michael Langsto

Requirements for F1 grand prix 2.0

by Michael Langsto » Sat, 23 Dec 1995 04:00:00


writes:


>>>I feel that Crammond is resisting SH-M's (Spectrum

Holobyte-Microprose)

   Are'nt we tired of this argument?

John Wallac

Requirements for F1 grand prix 2.0

by John Wallac » Sun, 24 Dec 1995 04:00:00


Yeah? You know it's wierd, the number of times I've been in my car and when someone drives toward
me the car kinda....rotates on the spot you know. Or whenever I cross a line in the road the car
swerves left and back, very wierd.....

When GP2 is released, I'll watch the newsgroup carefully waiting for you to prove your a grown up
really by eating those ill chosen words. ICR2 is good, no doubt about that. GP2 has the
triple advantage of coming out later, being written by Geoff "sim-god" Crammond and of course
being based upon the greatest racing championship in the world.

When it's finally released you shouldn't be allowed to buy it - you just get tied to a chair and
watch the ICR2 die-hards flocking to buy it.... :)

Cheers!
John
--
      oooO   _    _    Oooo   John Wallace, Edinburgh (Scotland)
     (   )  / )  ( \  (   )   CompuServe : 100347,3560

       \_)(___)  (___)(_/
          oooO    Oooo

Carlos Miguel Cordei

Requirements for F1 grand prix 2.0

by Carlos Miguel Cordei » Sun, 24 Dec 1995 04:00:00


>I also d/l the movie and was impressed enough i'll probably buy
>the sim despite the many delays, but as far as blowing away
>icr2 and Nascar....get real.

>Man, do you know what the words "physics model" mean?????   SH >doesn't!!!!

>  Papyrus doesn't make a F1 sim only because they don't wanna make MP
>look like babies!

>Have a good day.

Guys, reading your posts I can only come to one conclusion: I think
that you guys got brain washed by ICR2. Sure ICR2 is a great product
(possibly the most complete sim) but you shoudnt make stupid
statements like those. It makes you dummies even among the pro-ICR2
people.

For a start (and thats for you, kadlcak), F1GP was released in 1991
for the Amiga, so we might conclude that work on it began at the most
in 1990. I think that for that time it was a pretty revolutionary game
with the best "physics model" seen til then.

So, MP began the revolution, and if you are comparing the first real
game of simulation with a new game done 5 or more years later, you are
being a unfair. Nevertheless, I think that I prefer (my opinion!)
10.000 times the babys "physical model" of F1GP than the of ICR (I
heard ICR2s is more or less the same), and if you have played with a
Joystick or a wheel youll see it improves a lot. And if you turn off
all the helps (steering and traction) in it youll see that youll
have a more undriveble car, the one you wished for.

In the other hand, if youre saying that the GP2 "physical model" is
for babies let me advise you that you shoud talk to Geoff and tell him
that youre not happy with the game development and want out because
youre going off to Papyrus. Yes, I supose you are a member of Geoffs
team of course, how would you know about the GP2 "physical model" then
?

Let me tell you guys_that_say_ICR2_is_better_than_GP2 that GP2 is a
superb effort made by Geoff Crammond and his team (and Im sure ICR2
is too!) and the reason it is so late is because they are concerned
about releasing a high quality product and not a "beauty cleaned"
version of its predecessor.

In conclusion, I think the smartest move you could make is to SHUT UP
because GP2 does not exist yet and you are making a fool of yourselfs.
After GP2 is released then we can compare the two games, and the
discussion will be far more inteligent.

FINAL OBSERVATION: I think ICR (and ICR2 which I have not played yet)
and F1GP are very good sims, I am not saying one is better than the
other, that depends on the persons likes. But what I cannot stand is
guys that are so much brain washed that say "my game is better than
yours" when the yours doesnt exist yet. "Get real" yourself!

Miguel

**********************************************
Carlos Miguel Santos Cordeiro


**********************************************

I Sucked Up a Ford Tod

Requirements for F1 grand prix 2.0

by I Sucked Up a Ford Tod » Sun, 24 Dec 1995 04:00:00


>Yeah? You know it's wierd, the number of times I've been in my car and when someone drives toward
>me the car kinda....rotates on the spot you know.

Hmmmmm, Doesnt F1 use the same concept.

Again only non-americans think F1 is the greatest racing championship
in the world.  IMO F1 is boring. You want true racing, you watch
NASCAR Winston Cup Racing, this is one of the closest racing you can
watch.  F1 means every one (F)inishes (1)lap ahead of the other!!<G>

There is one true statement you can say about F1GP2 and that is it
will be the best F1 sim on the market.  Now the best racing sim, that
is something we will have to wait for, and it will also depend on the
person.

Cheers!


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.