rec.autos.simulators

Cowards

Eldre

Cowards

by Eldre » Thu, 08 Jul 1999 04:00:00


>> The war was stupid, IMO.  The guys FIGHTING it were not.  They risked their
>> lives for our country, and for that I honor them.  Yes, I *know* our
>country
>> wasn't in danger, but you understand what I mean...

>> Eldred

>I hope you aren't under the impression I think those fighting the war
>were stupid. I never implied that, in fact look at the line that reads
>"That war, NOT the men who fought in it, should be forgotten as quickly
>as possible in my opinion." Perhaps I just misinterpreted your post, or
>you did mine.

No, I didn't think you meant those fighting the war were stupid.  Apologies if
it seemed that way.

Eldred

__

Put your message in a modem, and throw it in the ***-sea...
remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

pqt2

Cowards

by pqt2 » Thu, 08 Jul 1999 04:00:00

  You won the name calling and derogatory remarks contest,  I will not stoop to your  standards.
You win, I'm out of this discussion.  Paul

> Cheers!
> John

Ed Ba

Cowards

by Ed Ba » Thu, 08 Jul 1999 04:00:00

On Wed, 07 Jul 1999 10:16:21 GMT,


http://aj.encyclopedia.com/articles/08921.html
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/amex/vietnam/trenches/mylai.html

--
* rrevved at mindspring dot com
* unit.26 - s.p.u.t.u.m.
* http://www.cabal.net
* http://www.sputum.com

Gaul

Cowards

by Gaul » Thu, 08 Jul 1999 04:00:00


Good grief, then you really don't know too much about that conflict then, do
you?  While My Lai was just a single incident in the war, how could you
possibly have not heard of it, especially when you were arguing with a vet
of that conflict?  Now I think that it is YOUR opinions which are based on
Oliver Stone movies.  Or is it just due to youth and lack of information?
Are you just some 16 year old kid mouthing off here or something?

I think you've shown your hand here.  First you've held up Muhammed Ali as a
hero when you don't seem to even know too much about the war that he was
protesting, and now you're saying that service to land and country is not an
honorable thing.  I think that we have a pretty clear picture of you now.
Lots of good men and women have died and endured hardship for their nation,
which includes people like you.  Good heavens... now I'm becoming MUCH more
sympathetic to Mr. Simmon's original choice of words.

Scot

Cowards

by Scot » Thu, 08 Jul 1999 04:00:00

Hey John---you totally contradict yourself in the same sentence

So do they have the right, or not? First you say they do, then you say
they don't. Or is it that we can call someone a "shit stain" as long as
it isn't AFTER they expressed their opinion, only before? I just don't
get the logic. It again points in the direction of "if someone gets
offended---then you can't say that". Not a good example of freedom if
you ask me.

Again, I should have myself more clear perhaps. When I mean they should
solve it between themselves, I mean it's a personal battle of words
between the 2 of them, and perhaps we should leave it to be battled on
by them. You are correct in thinking that if they bring it to a public
forum, then they should expect the public to get involved, but perhaps,
looking at it now, the whole thing was better left alone in the first
place, don't you think?

John Walla

Cowards

by John Walla » Thu, 08 Jul 1999 04:00:00


>  You won the name calling and derogatory remarks contest,
>I will not stoop to your  standards.

_POOR_ excuse to give up a discussion. In this thread I have never
dished out any more than I have received, so if you're going to leave
at least admit to yourself why you're doing it even if you don't do so
publically.

Cheers!
John

John Walla

Cowards

by John Walla » Thu, 08 Jul 1999 04:00:00



>>I have never HEARD of the Mi Lia incident,

>http://aj.encyclopedia.com/articles/08921.html
>http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/amex/vietnam/trenches/mylai.html

Thanks for the info, but I should probably have added that I'm happy
to continue my life without knowing the details of the Mi Lai incident
even now that I have heard of it :-)

Cheers!
John

John Walla

Cowards

by John Walla » Thu, 08 Jul 1999 04:00:00

On Wed, 7 Jul 1999 14:26:36 -0400, "Gault"


>Good grief, then you really don't know too much about that conflict then, do
>you?  While My Lai was just a single incident in the war, how could you
>possibly have not heard of it, especially when you were arguing with a vet
>of that conflict?

You probably haven't heard of flat zones but I wouldn't presume that
to mean you know nothing of computers. My knowledge of Vietnam is
broad - although in the U.S. it is a generational issue it's really
not a big deal at all here in the U.K.

My perceptions are based upon everything I have experienced, and Olly
Stone movies are an inescapable part of that. As to the others I'm
sure you can make, or gave made, up your own mind on those.

Oh for heaven's sake, please not the classic Usenet "non-response".
READ what I wrote - "...is not IN ITSELF a laudable...".. That is a
very different meaning from the words you are trying to insert into my
mouth. Answer what I wrote, not what you wish I had.

If you do then it's the wrong one.

Don't be bashful now, say what you mean.

Cheers!
John

John Walla

Cowards

by John Walla » Thu, 08 Jul 1999 04:00:00


>Hey John---you totally contradict yourself in the same sentence

No, you are just unable to understand it.

No, it's certainly been a voyage of foot-stamping, petulance and
morale crusading around here - quite an eye-opener in many ways.

Probably best left alone, <rhetoric> but then if I choose to take
exception to unjustified abuse and people take exception to my
exception, what's a guy to do? </rhetoric>

Cheers!
John

Scot

Cowards

by Scot » Fri, 09 Jul 1999 04:00:00



> >Hey John---you totally contradict yourself in the same sentence

> No, you are just unable to understand it.

I understood it perfectly clear. You implied that one person has the
right to an "unjustified" opinion----"all vietnam vets are nuts"-------
or something to that effect. But another doesn't have a right to an
"unjustified" opinion----"your a shit stain for thinking all vietnam
vets are nuts", or again, something to that effect. BOTH have equal
right to their respective opinions. Justified or not. Admit it John, you
don't like one of them, so you feel they should not be able to say it.
Plain and simple.
Ed Ba

Cowards

by Ed Ba » Fri, 09 Jul 1999 04:00:00

On Thu, 08 Jul 1999 02:30:07 GMT,




>> >Hey John---you totally contradict yourself in the same sentence

>> No, you are just unable to understand it.

>I understood it perfectly clear. You implied that one person has the
>right to an "unjustified" opinion----"all vietnam vets are nuts"-------
>or something to that effect. But another doesn't have a right to an
>"unjustified" opinion----"your a shit stain for thinking all vietnam
>vets are nuts", or again, something to that effect. BOTH have equal
>right to their respective opinions. Justified or not. Admit it John, you
>don't like one of them, so you feel they should not be able to say it.
>Plain and simple.

I like John, but it is apparent to me that he has never suffered
conscription by his country into a war that fell out of popular favor.

Those vets were doing their job. Some of them, frustrated by the
horror of the situation, the pathetic rules of engagement, inept leadership
and the ***y-trap deaths of their buddies took matters into their own
hands, from time to time.

They just wanted to survive and to come home to their families.

Period.

I have nothing but respect for them and what they had to do. I would
have been there myself, but was discharged in 1964.

John, please don't second-guess the actions of -normal- Americans
when faced with their own life and death during the Vietnam war.
I'm afraid that you simply don't know what you're talking about.

Thanks.

--
* rrevved at mindspring dot com
* unit.26 - s.p.u.t.u.m.
* http://www.racesimcentral.net/
* http://www.racesimcentral.net/

John Walla

Cowards

by John Walla » Fri, 09 Jul 1999 04:00:00


>> No, you are just unable to understand it.

>I understood it perfectly clear.

Believe me, you didn't. You may think you did but I can assure you
that you're mistaken.

Cheers!
John

John Walla

Cowards

by John Walla » Fri, 09 Jul 1999 04:00:00



>I like John, but it is apparent to me that he has never suffered
>conscription by his country into a war that fell out of popular favor.

I would say that such a description probably covers the vast majority
of people young/mid-age people in the world today, particularly in
Europe where I live. I'm not unusual in that.

This thread started with a clear-cut black and white bit of verbal
abuse, meandered around with people trying to second guess what _I_
would do if _I_ had been in Vietnam, and arrived at the current point.
At no time did I second guess the actions of -normal- Americans - what
I did was to state (the clear fact) that serving your country does not
automatically qualify you as a good person, and that some (unspecified
percentage) of the Americans serving there perpetrated some horrific
atrocities.

If you can tell me that the above statement is wrong and that I don't
what I am talking about I will gladly listen. However please DON'T
misinterpret that comment as "all vets committed atrocities" as that
is not what it means. It was an isolated statement designed to
illustrate that serving in the army implies nothing about you. You may
be a volunteer, you may be drafted, you may be a Green beret, you may
have served in the Women's Auxiliary Balloon Corps - serving in the
army tells next to nothing about a person - that was the only point of
the statement.

I have a lot of respect for Ali for standing up for his opinions - I
also mentioned that I have a lot of respect for people who went and
fought for their country. The only way to talk about a group of people
is to generalise, and yet war brings out such extremes of emotion that
comments made in that manner can only be understood if people listen
to them in that manner - there are ALWAYS going to be exceptions which
certainly shouldn't be considered as personal slights.

Cheers!
John

Ed Ba

Cowards

by Ed Ba » Fri, 09 Jul 1999 04:00:00

On Thu, 08 Jul 1999 08:10:01 GMT,


John, I am taking the liberty of focusing on this one, misguided
issue to make a point. I hope you don't take offense.

Cassius Clay (M.Ali) was -never- a Muslim until he was served
with his draft papers. Did you know that?

Also, I don't have too much sympathy for people who want
the protection of their country and system of government
without accepting their share of responsibility in the
country's time of need.

If everyone had taken Ali's 'heroic' approach in WWII,
you would be sprechen German instead of speaking with
that Scottish brogue I am sure that you cherish.

It's time to stop and think about this, John. It was a bad
time in the history of the world, but normal, everyday
people fought in it. They weren't some sort of military
satan. None of them.

--
* rrevved at mindspring dot com
* unit.26 - s.p.u.t.u.m.
* http://www.cabal.net
* http://www.sputum.com

Michael Kneph

Cowards

by Michael Kneph » Fri, 09 Jul 1999 04:00:00





> >Having seen him dirsupt many other newsgroups, I'm afraid he's all too
> >serious. With regard to his illness, you can't fake Crohn's Disease,
> >the diagnosis is pretty accurate.

I have no idea what the rest of this thread is about, but as a PSA, I
just thought I'd pip in and say that my father-in-law was previously
diagnosed with Crohn's disease, but it turned out to be ciliac sprew
(sp?) - aka gluten intolerance. He's eliminated wheat from his diet and
has been recovering quite nicely.

rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.