> Pardon me, but weren't those vet's fighting for freedom of speech?
NO!---they were not fighting for freedom of speech----that was never in
jeopardy or an issue of vietnam that we went to war over. When was the
last time you heard "vietnam--the war for free speech". The US in fact
was never in direct jeopardy, and I personally objected to it, but
that's another story. It was a HUGE political war and nothing more, that
cost many good men their lives, and countless others there souls. That
war, NOT the men who fought in it, should be forgotten as quickly as
possible in my opinion. But first we must learn from the terrible
mistake that was made there. It left a bad taste in the mouth of the
entire world.
Personally I think they are both wrong John. Althugh they both have the
legal right to do so, they need to ask themsleves if they have the m***
right. Expressing an opinion about something you know nothing
about(being a veteran of war), is NO better than insulting a person you
know nothing about. They both(the replies, not the people) are poor
excuses for human relations, and are the reason many wars are started in
the first place. People just need to think a little more before they
speak.....it would save a ton of trouble for the world.