rec.autos.simulators

Video card for gp2

Vic Greenwo

Video card for gp2

by Vic Greenwo » Mon, 09 Dec 1996 04:00:00

I would like to know the best video card to run gp2 on a p5-133

--

Jorge E. Ravelo, M.D

Video card for gp2

by Jorge E. Ravelo, M.D » Mon, 09 Dec 1996 04:00:00


> I would like to know the best video card to run gp2 on a p5-133

> --

Hercules Dynamite 128/Video 4mb MDRAM working at 99mhz.
gre

Video card for gp2

by gre » Mon, 09 Dec 1996 04:00:00



Hercules Dynamite 128, its currently the fastest 2d Dos card,

here the url http://www.hercules.com/presale/specs/d128.htm

Gregory Alferov                            ~~_____~~      

http://www.sure.net/~tifosi/           [__]=[_(-)_]=[__]

Jeff Vince

Video card for gp2

by Jeff Vince » Wed, 11 Dec 1996 04:00:00




>>I would like to know the best video card to run gp2 on a p5-133

>Hercules Dynamite 128, its currently the fastest 2d Dos card,

>here the url http://www.hercules.com/presale/specs/d128.htm

   If you're *only* a GP2 fan, good advice.

   If you enjoy ICR2 or NASCAR2, look into the Rendition Verite-based
cards such as the Intergraph Reactor or Sierra Screamin' 3D (the
Creative Labs 3D Blaster PCI is also a Verite card, but it doesn't
include the Rendition version of ICR2 in its bundle).  You'll get
enhanced appearance and faster frame rates in games written for the
Verite and performance close to the Dynamite 128 for GP2.

   Check out: http://www.intergraph.com/ics/reactor


Pick one or more: Model Rockets (competition-NERCB) / PCs (even Atari!) /
Papyrus ICR-ICR2-NCR / Who needs a life when you have multiple non-lives?

gre

Video card for gp2

by gre » Fri, 13 Dec 1996 04:00:00

This is absolutely not true, Intergraph will run GP2, much much
slower, because it is only optimized for 3d, and in 2d it is
very slow.

But if you are only running Nascar2, Indycar2, Quake( i think)
integraph is ok.  Yet Verite chip set video cards, are slower in 3d
then Voodoo, chip set video card.

I dont know, why papyrus decided ( maybe Sierra ordered them to) to
make a games for Verite cards, but if they made it for Voodoo, we
would probably get 35fps, constantly (on p90).  

__

Gregory Alferov                               ~~_____~~      

http://www.sure.net/~tifosi/           [__]=[_(-)_]=[__]

Bob Chalfi

Video card for gp2

by Bob Chalfi » Fri, 13 Dec 1996 04:00:00


> >>Hercules Dynamite 128, its currently the fastest 2d Dos card,

> >>here the url http://www.hercules.com/presale/specs/d128.htm

> >   If you're *only* a GP2 fan, good advice.

> >   If you enjoy ICR2 or NASCAR2, look into the Rendition Verite-based
> >cards such as the Intergraph Reactor or Sierra Screamin' 3D (the
> >Creative Labs 3D Blaster PCI is also a Verite card, but it doesn't
> >include the Rendition version of ICR2 in its bundle).  You'll get
> >enhanced appearance and faster frame rates in games written for the
> >Verite and performance close to the Dynamite 128 for GP2.

> This is absolutely not true, Intergraph will run GP2, much much
> slower, because it is only optimized for 3d, and in 2d it is
> very slow.

> But if you are only running Nascar2, Indycar2, Quake( i think)
> integraph is ok.  Yet Verite chip set video cards, are slower in 3d
> then Voodoo, chip set video card.

> I dont know, why papyrus decided ( maybe Sierra ordered them to) to
> make a games for Verite cards, but if they made it for Voodoo, we
> would probably get 35fps, constantly (on p90).

> __

> Gregory Alferov                               ~~_____~~

This is not true either.  The Reactor does have a problem with being
slow in old VGA, but in SVGA/VESA 2.0, the Reactor is nearly as fast as
an ET6000 board, and this is only revision 1.0 of its drivers.

Bob Chalfin

Eric T. Busc

Video card for gp2

by Eric T. Busc » Sat, 14 Dec 1996 04:00:00

This is untrue.  The Reactor has a very slow VGA core, which is what
GP2 uses to estimate framerates.  It's VESA speeds are right on par
with the fastest DOS performers, the ET-6000 based cards.

--

Emory University Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
The IWCCCARS Project: Q & A Representative
Nascar Setups Page: http://userwww.service.emory.edu/~ebusch/



akco..

Video card for gp2

by akco.. » Sat, 14 Dec 1996 04:00:00

Hogwash.  The rendition cards have excellent VESA performance, just a
tad slower than the ET6000 chipset cards.  They are very slow in VGA,
but since GP2 supports VESA modes, it should run very well on a
Rendition card.

David

*** You're only young once, but you can stay immature forever ***

Jeff Vince

Video card for gp2

by Jeff Vince » Sun, 15 Dec 1996 04:00:00



>>   If you enjoy ICR2 or NASCAR2, look into the Rendition Verite-based
>>cards such as the Intergraph Reactor or Sierra Screamin' 3D (the
>>Creative Labs 3D Blaster PCI is also a Verite card, but it doesn't
>>include the Rendition version of ICR2 in its bundle).  You'll get
>>enhanced appearance and faster frame rates in games written for the
>>Verite and performance close to the Dynamite 128 for GP2.

>This is absolutely not true, Intergraph will run GP2, much much
>slower, because it is only optimized for 3d, and in 2d it is
>very slow.

   Do you have direct evidence of the slow Verite speed of GP2?  

   Here's what I have heard...  The VGA mode of the Verite is *very*
slow, but GP2 is played using the VESA SVGA modes, which are fast,
comparable to the ET6000 (a tad slower).  GP2 uses this slow VGA mode
to compute its video log score (usually a paltry 25 or so on most
machines) and to compute suggested frame rates, but the card actually
performs better than that score would indicate.

   I *don't* have direct evidence of much of the above (at least the
comparison to other cards), since the Reactor is the only card that's
ever been in *my* new P133.  GP2 does run faster than it did on my
DX2/66, if that helps.  :)

   There are Rendition-accelerated versions of ICR2, NASCAR2, and
Quake.  To the best of my knowledge, none of these are available
Voodoo-accelerated.  

   If you want racing sims, 2 of the 3 big racing sims are
Verite-specific.  The third (GP2) hasn't announced which 3D
acceleration it will support (if any).  For sim-racers, the choice is
pretty simple (IMHO).

   Papyrus has been working on the Verite port of ICR2 for much of
this year, so they're been behind that technology since (or even prior
to) its inception.  The Verite-accelerated ICR2 can hit 60+ fps on my
P133 (when you take the 30fps real-time governor off).


Pick one or more: Model Rockets (competition-NERCB) / PCs (even Atari!) /
Papyrus ICR-ICR2-NCR / Who needs a life when you have multiple non-lives?

simrac..

Video card for gp2

by simrac.. » Sun, 15 Dec 1996 04:00:00

Hi Guys,

I have a P100 using an Intergraph card, and GP2 is significantly faster
than when I was running with my Diamond Stealth 64 2Mb DRAM (video).

I can run with medium detail at most tracks, with only trackside objects,
fences, and cars w/ track and curbs in the mirrors with an OCC between
95-150%, and when detail is set to low OCC is between 65-95%.

Perhaps it's the motherboard that's the bottle neck on other systems?

BTW, I get 110fps+ (no detail<g>) with frame-limiter removed.  ~:P

Best Regards,

Marc J. Nelson
Sim Racing News

David DeStefa

Video card for gp2

by David DeStefa » Sun, 15 Dec 1996 04:00:00


>>> This is absolutely not true, Intergraph will run GP2, much much
>>> slower, because it is only optimized for 3d, and in 2d it is
>>> very slow.
>Hogwash.  The rendition cards have excellent VESA performance, just a
>tad slower than the ET6000 chipset cards.  They are very slow in VGA,
>but since GP2 supports VESA modes, it should run very well on a
>Rendition card.

I'm not speaking for all Reactor owners, but I for one get horrible
fps with this card and GP2, with all textures off in SVGA I have an
estimated 12 fps...this is with a P133 w/32 megs of ram.  If anyone
else has figured out how to get this thing to work with GP2, please
let me know.


David Gree

Video card for gp2

by David Gree » Mon, 16 Dec 1996 04:00:00




>>>> This is absolutely not true, Intergraph will run GP2, much much
>>>> slower, because it is only optimized for 3d, and in 2d it is
>>>> very slow.

>>Hogwash.  The rendition cards have excellent VESA performance, just a
>>tad slower than the ET6000 chipset cards.  They are very slow in VGA,
>>but since GP2 supports VESA modes, it should run very well on a
>>Rendition card.

>I'm not speaking for all Reactor owners, but I for one get horrible
>fps with this card and GP2, with all textures off in SVGA I have an
>estimated 12 fps...this is with a P133 w/32 megs of ram.  If anyone
>else has figured out how to get this thing to work with GP2, please
>let me know.

Forget your estimated FPS, GP2 is screwed by the slow video log mark.
Set your framerate as to what you think will be ok, then guide adjustments
by checking the processor occupancy "O" key.

try 17.0fps with Kerb,track,fences,objects, trackside medium, and nothing in
the mirrors as a starting point.

Dyno Do

Video card for gp2

by Dyno Do » Mon, 16 Dec 1996 04:00:00



>I'm not speaking for all Reactor owners, but I for one get horrible
>fps with this card and GP2, with all textures off in SVGA I have an
>estimated 12 fps...this is with a P133 w/32 megs of ram.  If anyone
>else has figured out how to get this thing to work with GP2, please
>let me know.

Me too. With the same settings for graphics in GP2 that I used with
the old Diamond Stealth 64, I dropped from an estimated 19 FPS to 10.
Although it SEEMS faster than that. Could the estimated frame rate be
wrong with the Reactor?

-=Don=-

Eric T. Busc

Video card for gp2

by Eric T. Busc » Mon, 16 Dec 1996 04:00:00

Yes GP2 incorrectly uses the Reactor's slow VGA core to estimate
framerates.  It's SVGA speed is well above what the program thinks it
should be.

--

Emory University Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
The IWCCCARS Project: Q & A Representative
Nascar Setups Page: http://userwww.service.emory.edu/~ebusch/


Ryan J Snodgras

Video card for gp2

by Ryan J Snodgras » Mon, 16 Dec 1996 04:00:00

Does anyone know if there are any plans to port GP2's to the Rendition
chipset? This is one of my favorite simulators and it's a shame I can't
use the Reactor with it.
Ryan
--
"Live to own a Ferrari."


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.