rec.autos.simulators

OT: Help me with these curious benchmark results...

Mark Daviso

OT: Help me with these curious benchmark results...

by Mark Daviso » Fri, 19 Jul 2002 04:25:04

I know, I know - but I only "do" racing sims...

System - 3DMark score

GF2MX PCI in 866Mhz P3 - 1960

GF2MX PCI in AMD 1800 XP - 1960

GF4MX440 in AMD 1800 XP - 4255

Here's the thing...

I guess I must have been maxing out the GF2 with the 866 so no improvement,
yet some of the individual averages are a little higher with the 866...

Here's the wierd one, tho:
Vertex Shader.  17.7 fps with GF2 in 866, 15.7 with GF2 in 1800, 7.5 (SEVEN
POINT FIVE!) with GF4 in 1800.

The GF4MX440 is, I suspect, broken as I get curious graphical anomolies in
the high detail lobby test, and the F12K2 demo gives me some lovely
psychadelic effects in smoke and on tyre sidewalls...

Bring on the Ti4200 - should arrive tomorrow...

Cheers,

Mark
Reading, UK

Dave Henri

OT: Help me with these curious benchmark results...

by Dave Henri » Fri, 19 Jul 2002 08:52:35


  Nope not broken...but it's NOT really a GF 4.  What the mx 440 is ......is
a gf2 with some faster memory thrown in.  It cannot do dx8 effects.  rather
than use 2001 se version of 3dmark, you should probably used the 2000
version.    Nvidia should offer a refund to any purchaser who thought
because the box said GF4 they were actually getting a GF4.
dave henrie

Mar

OT: Help me with these curious benchmark results...

by Mar » Fri, 19 Jul 2002 18:08:26




> > Here's the wierd one, tho:
> > Vertex Shader.  17.7 fps with GF2 in 866, 15.7 with GF2 in 1800, 7.5
>  (SEVEN
> > POINT FIVE!) with GF4 in 1800.

> > The GF4MX440 is, I suspect, broken as I get curious graphical anomolies in
> > the high detail lobby test, and the F12K2 demo gives me some lovely
> > psychadelic effects in smoke and on tyre sidewalls...

> > Bring on the Ti4200 - should arrive tomorrow...

> > Cheers,

> > Mark
> > Reading, UK

>   Nope not broken...but it's NOT really a GF 4.  What the mx 440 is ......is
> a gf2 with some faster memory thrown in.  It cannot do dx8 effects.  rather
> than use 2001 se version of 3dmark, you should probably used the 2000
> version.    Nvidia should offer a refund to any purchaser who thought
> because the box said GF4 they were actually getting a GF4.
> dave henrie

I know a GF4MX is just a warmed up GF2MX, but the GF2 does 3DMark 2001
and F12002 with no problems (albeit slowly).  Areas in 3DMark with no
hardware support are skipped, and the GF2 and 4 skip the same tests.
The GF4 has issues where the GF2 has none and in the case highlighted
above is actually significantly slower.  Anyway, this should all be
"moo" (it's like a cows opinion - it doesn't matter) later today if my
Ti4200 turns up...
*OhPleaseOhPleaseOhPlease*

Cheers,

Mark
Reading, UK

Dave Henri

OT: Help me with these curious benchmark results...

by Dave Henri » Fri, 19 Jul 2002 22:15:59

"Mark"
.  Anyway, this should all be
  I hope it shows up.  Good luck with the new card, let us know how things
work after you get it in.
dave henrie

Mark Daviso

OT: Help me with these curious benchmark results...

by Mark Daviso » Sat, 20 Jul 2002 02:36:57


I AM PULLING MY FRICKIN HAIR OUT!!!

I've got the 4200 now and I wasn't expecting miracles but I thought I'd do
better that a 3DMark of 6320.  And the Vertex shader benchmark is *still*
lower than the GF2MX PCI was on the 866!!  12.9 fps vs 17.7!!!  The GF2MX
managed 15.7 fps on the 1800XP!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
One thing the 866Mhz setup had was 512Mb SDRAM.
There's something wierd going on in this system somewhere.

Who's up for helping me out here?

There's probably a wrong jumper setting on the motherboard (ECI K7S5A) or a
BIOS problem, I reckon.

Feck.

Mark
Reading, UK

Dave Henri

OT: Help me with these curious benchmark results...

by Dave Henri » Sat, 20 Jul 2002 08:22:07

  I wouldn't be suprised if the GF2 was mis-reporting it's fps.  Since it
doesn't do dx8 completely, I'm wondering instead of skipping the test it
just gave you a false reading.
dave henrie

(for benchmarking make sure your test is set to equal your desktop...I'd
suggest placing your desktop color depth to 1024x720x16 and make sure the
test uses the same settings)




> > "Mark"
> > .  Anyway, this should all be
> > > "moo" (it's like a cows opinion - it doesn't matter) later today if my
> > > Ti4200 turns up...
> > > *OhPleaseOhPleaseOhPlease*

> > > Cheers,

> > > Mark
> > > Reading, UK
> >   I hope it shows up.  Good luck with the new card, let us know how
things
> > work after you get it in.
> > dave henrie

> I AM PULLING MY FRICKIN HAIR OUT!!!

> I've got the 4200 now and I wasn't expecting miracles but I thought I'd do
> better that a 3DMark of 6320.  And the Vertex shader benchmark is *still*
> lower than the GF2MX PCI was on the 866!!  12.9 fps vs 17.7!!!  The GF2MX
> managed 15.7 fps on the 1800XP!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
> One thing the 866Mhz setup had was 512Mb SDRAM.
> There's something wierd going on in this system somewhere.

> Who's up for helping me out here?

> There's probably a wrong jumper setting on the motherboard (ECI K7S5A) or
a
> BIOS problem, I reckon.

> Feck.

> Mark
> Reading, UK

Tom Pabs

OT: Help me with these curious benchmark results...

by Tom Pabs » Sat, 20 Jul 2002 08:37:25

Mark...

What drivers are you using?  And, what are your SBA and FW settings on the
mobo and vga bios?  You definitely got something set wrong......those two
are biggest culprits for low performance on a Ti 4200 or 4600.  I just
minimized this newsgroup window....left all my FSAA and anisotropic settings
"on"....and did a quick n' dirty 3DM2Kse run......it was 8290 with a VS of
42.7fps.  This is a 1.4gig with 512DDR and a ti4200.  With a clean prep
run...I get north of 9500 on 3DM2Kse.  But, I've meticulously gone through
all system settings.....best bet there is to go to Guru3D, live on their
forums for a while.

TP




> > "Mark"
> > .  Anyway, this should all be
> > > "moo" (it's like a cows opinion - it doesn't matter) later today if my
> > > Ti4200 turns up...
> > > *OhPleaseOhPleaseOhPlease*

> > > Cheers,

> > > Mark
> > > Reading, UK
> >   I hope it shows up.  Good luck with the new card, let us know how
things
> > work after you get it in.
> > dave henrie

> I AM PULLING MY FRICKIN HAIR OUT!!!

> I've got the 4200 now and I wasn't expecting miracles but I thought I'd do
> better that a 3DMark of 6320.  And the Vertex shader benchmark is *still*
> lower than the GF2MX PCI was on the 866!!  12.9 fps vs 17.7!!!  The GF2MX
> managed 15.7 fps on the 1800XP!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
> One thing the 866Mhz setup had was 512Mb SDRAM.
> There's something wierd going on in this system somewhere.

> Who's up for helping me out here?

> There's probably a wrong jumper setting on the motherboard (ECI K7S5A) or
a
> BIOS problem, I reckon.

> Feck.

> Mark
> Reading, UK

Mar

OT: Help me with these curious benchmark results...

by Mar » Sat, 20 Jul 2002 19:06:18


> Mark...

> What drivers are you using?  And, what are your SBA and FW settings on the
> mobo and vga bios?  You definitely got something set wrong......those two
> are biggest culprits for low performance on a Ti 4200 or 4600.  I just
> minimized this newsgroup window....left all my FSAA and anisotropic settings
> "on"....and did a quick n' dirty 3DM2Kse run......it was 8290 with a VS of
> 42.7fps.  This is a 1.4gig with 512DDR and a ti4200.  With a clean prep
> run...I get north of 9500 on 3DM2Kse.  But, I've meticulously gone through
> all system settings.....best bet there is to go to Guru3D, live on their
> forums for a while.

SBA - Sideband addressing?
FW - ??

I'm using the latest NVidia drivers.  I notice that SBA (if I got the
acronym right) is available but disbled according to 3DMark's results.
 I can't find anywhere in the the BOIS that resembles a switch for
this.  According to the manual - haven't scanned the hardware itself
yet, there are only 2 jumper switches on the board.  One is to clear
the BIOS, the other is to enable that interface who's name I forget -
small slot for modem.

Gotta be something up somewhere.  I wish I knew someone with the same
card so I could swap it and give it a try.

I said in another post that my framerates in N2K2 have gone up all of
4fps over the GF4MX 440.  Not exactly earth shattering, eh?

BTW, thanks for the Sears upgrade, Tom, but I haven't had a chance to
install it yet because of this problem taking up all my time...

Mark
Reading, UK

B.Farme

OT: Help me with these curious benchmark results...

by B.Farme » Sat, 20 Jul 2002 22:10:11



Mark, read some of your posts & will give it a shot.

SBA (side band addressing) is controversial, esp w/ Via chipset MBs.  FWIW it
doesn't seem to help on my system, XP1800 - Soyo Dragon+ (Via 266a chipset) -
GF3 ti200, so I have it disabled because some say it could cause instability.

FW (fast writes) OTOH seem to noticeably help.  This needs to be enabled in the
MB Bios, *and* enabled in a tweaker prog like Rivatuner, GeForce Tweaker, etc.
YMMV

Only suggestion I have is to make sure that the driver install didn't revert the
vid card back to a 1x or 2x AGP setting, as happened to me a couple of times.
Using one of the progs above (I prefer Rivatuner) make sure that you have 4x
enabled, & that it takes after a reboot.  Probably not your problem, but I can't
think of anything else.

HTH,
Brian

Russell Laughlin Jr

OT: Help me with these curious benchmark results...

by Russell Laughlin Jr » Sun, 21 Jul 2002 02:30:46

Not to rub salt in the wound, but I just built a XP 1800+ with a Ti4200 and
saw a 9775 in 3DMark 2001 after setting the BIOS to all performance
defaults.

This is in Win XP Pro at 10x7x32 and no overclocking.  I'd double check all
your BIOS settings and make sure the chipset drivers are installed correctly
as well.

Russ



Greger Hut

OT: Help me with these curious benchmark results...

by Greger Hut » Sun, 21 Jul 2002 03:50:22

Oh, and forgot to add that you don't need to change any jumper
settings... I've changed some settings in the BIOS, like the memory
timing and AGP aperture size (called something else in this BIOS,
don't remember what right now) to 128 MB.

Most likely there's a conflict with your AGP drivers or something like
that. I remember that I got a 1600 score in 3D Mark the first time I
ran it after I had installed these new components. Main things that
helped was re-installing windows and installing the AGP driver from
the CD before installing nVidia drivers.

 - Greger

Greger Hut

OT: Help me with these curious benchmark results...

by Greger Hut » Sun, 21 Jul 2002 03:45:11



Hi Mark

I got the ECS K7S5A (same as yours if I read right?) mobo and an
Athlon XP 1800+ on Tuesday to replace my Abit KT7 / AMD Duron 700
combo.

I got a 3249 score in 3DMark 2001 SE with my GeForce 2 MX 32 MB video
card overclocked to 190 core / 209 MHz memory. I got a 2500 score with
my old system and 3200 is probably all my current video card can do...
I'm planning on getting a GF4 next week. My vertex shader score was
35.4 fps.

In N2002 I saw a bigger difference as with my old system I was getting
little under 30 fps at Daytona on the front straight with 25 AI cars.
Now in the same place I get over 50 fps and I have most of the gfx
options turned on, so the difference compared to my old system is
almost 30 fps.

I'm not sure what your problem could be... did you install the AGP
drivers that came on the mobo CD before installing the nVidia drivers?
That seemed to help for me. Oh, I'm running the 29.42 drivers at the
moment.. Win98.

I also re-installed Windows (twice, actually!) which always seems like
a good idea when you change your mobo. Anyway, let me know if you have
any questions and I'll try to help...

 - Greger

Mark Daviso

OT: Help me with these curious benchmark results...

by Mark Daviso » Mon, 22 Jul 2002 06:48:57


Thanks for the suggestions all.  Guru3D seems a good place, too.  Thanks,
Tom.
Not had time to play with the kit but wanted to pop in see if anyone had
anymore tips.  Didn't want to seem to disappear!!

Cheers,

Mark

Mark Daviso

OT: Help me with these curious benchmark results...

by Mark Daviso » Mon, 22 Jul 2002 19:58:21

This was fantastic!  I had gutted my PC but did not realise I needed to
install AGP drivers!

Much better now.

As you've got the same mobo...

Is there a way on enabling fast writes?  Do you know if it makes a
difference?

Cheers,

Mark
Reading, UK


Greger Hut

OT: Help me with these curious benchmark results...

by Greger Hut » Wed, 24 Jul 2002 08:05:04

On Sun, 21 Jul 2002 10:58:21 +0000 (UTC), "Mark Davison"


>This was fantastic!  I had gutted my PC but did not realise I needed to
>install AGP drivers!

>Much better now.

Good to hear that it helped!

No idea, haven't seen the option for that or SBA in the BIOS. Maybe a
BIOS update would help, but I'm not sure about that. I'll try to check
some forums for more info.

 - Greger


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.