rec.autos.simulators

3Dfx vs. Riva 128 in CART PR (benchmark results)

Sergey Zakharo

3Dfx vs. Riva 128 in CART PR (benchmark results)

by Sergey Zakharo » Sat, 29 Nov 1997 04:00:00

I did a quick benchmark using CART Precision Racing (full version) to
find the performance difference between the 3Dfx (Orchid R3D) and the
Riva 128 (Viper V330). I drove while my brother watched and recorded the
high/low framerates. The test was configured as follows: All graphics
options "on" or "full", sound was set to 16-bit stereo, track used was
Michigan in practice mode with no opponents. Measurements were taken
during one full lap (-after- completing one full pre-lap to load in all
textures). The R3D was tweeked using the following in win.ini:

[3dfx]
SST_GRXCLK=54
SST_VIDEO_24BPP=1
SST_SCREENREFRESH=75
SST_GAMMA=1.0
SST_FASTMEM=1
SST_FASTPCIRD=1
SST_MEMINFO=1
SST_MEMINFO_LFB=1
SST_MEMINFO_TEX=1
SST_SWAP_EN_WAIT_ON_VSYNC=0

 Brief system configuration:
P233MMX (o/c to 250Mhz (83.3Mhz bus))
Asus T2P4 rev 3.2(512k)
128Mb EDO
Viper drivers 4.10.01.0015
3Dfx D3D reference drivers 2.13

         Framerate(lowest) Framerate(highest)    
3Dfx                 14                27
Riva 128-            13                22

The results show that the 3Dfx is a bit faster, at least in -this- game
and using this particular benchmark. I know that the Riva beats out the
3Dfx in other D3D benchmarks...maybe the other benchmarks don't strain
the chipsets as much as CART does. Regardless, this wasn't a test to see
who beats who. It was just a test to see which card I should be running
when playing this rather "demanding" game. I like, and use -both- the
Viper V330 and the R3D...I play Jedi Knight in 800x600 on the Viper V330
and am -very- pleased with it's performance.

--
Sergey Zakharov

To reply, replace "nospam" with my organization.

Sergey Zakharo

3Dfx vs. Riva 128 in CART PR (benchmark results)

by Sergey Zakharo » Thu, 04 Dec 1997 04:00:00


> You didn't mention whether or not the Riva was the AGP version or the PCI
> version.  The AGP Riva I have absolutely smokes...

 Ooops! The PCI version was used in the comparison.
--
Sergey Zakharov

To reply, replace "nospam" with my organization.

Randy BO

3Dfx vs. Riva 128 in CART PR (benchmark results)

by Randy BO » Fri, 05 Dec 1997 04:00:00

You didn't mention whether or not the Riva was the AGP version or the PCI
version.  The AGP Riva I have absolutely smokes...

Randy
Randy Magruder
Staff Writer
Digital Sportspage
http://www.digitalsports.com/

ymenar

3Dfx vs. Riva 128 in CART PR (benchmark results)

by ymenar » Fri, 05 Dec 1997 04:00:00



>> You didn't mention whether or not the Riva was the AGP version or the PCI
>> version.  The AGP Riva I have absolutely smokes...
> Ooops! The PCI version was used in the comparison.

Just for the intension of everybody, The AGP Riva  (STB Velocity 128) has
the highest benchmarks of all the video cards, 3D accelerated or not.

Presently, the STB Velocity is the best video card that you can buy,
assuming that you are searching for a good all-around SimRacing video card.
Gp2 will run great. N2 and Icr2 will run great but you will not race the
rendition version.  Soda will be a blast, very fast (remember SODA is
presently the best pure simracing title on the market).  With F1RS you will
have the best D3D results of all the D3D cards.  C:PR is maybe the only
flaw, but it is because of some incompatibility between the game and the
card.

You can argue me, I know some people here that can be on my side (Randy and
other simracers here).  But I have a Dell P2 266mhz, so the results may be
different on less powerfull systems.

Fran?ois Mnard
ymenard on NROS
http://www.awpss.com/


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.