rec.autos.simulators

> > I thought all of you yeripeeeins spent most of your time locked up in
> > dungeons.

> > David G Fisher

> well, that bit's true.......:-)

>>>> However, censorship of an opinion simply because it's unpopular is
>>>> the first step to fascism.

>>> Some of the more vital parts of Fascism are Nationalism, Militarism &
>>> Racism.  You are exhibiting at least 2 of those yourself.

>>   Where's Papa Doc when you need him.
>> dave henrie

> :-)  I was thinking about him too as I wrote that.  LOL!

> >> Pull your head out of your ass and start thinking like a 'capitalist'
> >> ignoramus, instead of a 'patriotic' ignoramous.

> >There's not a damn thing wrong with being patriotic.

> Well, no, but you're not being patriotic.  You're being xenophobic and
***ing
> ignorant.  But I doubt you could tell the difference.

> > >> Pull your head out of your ass and start thinking like a 'capitalist'
> > >> ignoramus, instead of a 'patriotic' ignoramous.

> > >There's not a damn thing wrong with being patriotic.

> > Well, no, but you're not being patriotic.  You're being xenophobic and
> ***ing
> > ignorant.  But I doubt you could tell the difference.

> Interesting how quickly some people misuse "xenophobic" in such a simple
> situation.  Let me first make a few things clear: (a) I could give two
shits
> about NASCAR and US-only cars; (b) I could care less if John's post was
> removed since he has no right to free speech on a privately owned forum.
> My complaint rests squarely on guys like you who take this issue out of
> context so they can use big words like "xenophobic".

> John's point, whether you agree or not, is EXTREMELY simple to grasp.  He
> sees NASCAR as an American institution.  I personally find that silly but
> he's entitled to his belief and I'm not going to debate the merits.  His
> complaint is that allowing foreign cars breaks from TRADITION which he
> reveres.  Again, silly to me but a REASONABLE belief nonetheless and one
to
> which he is entitled to passionately support.  More importantly, it is a
> belief that seems honestly fueled by patriotism and respect for tradition.
> He's not worried about: "The Jap-o-nese are comin' in here and takin' jobs
> from good ole God fearin' Americans".

> Any claim that John is xenophobic is truly ignorant.  It's a wonderful
> technique used by the media to spin a bigger story out of a much smaller
> issue; something that should be frowned upon in ng's. ;0)

> --
> Joe M.

> > -Tim

> >> What if he had said "No Japanese cars"?

> >Well, I coulda said that, but:

> You prefer racist epithets, right.  We realized that already.

> >2) Saying "Japanese Cars" was, IMHO, too close to showing considered
> >respect for the idea of allowing foreign cars into Winston Cup.

> Right.  You're racist world view doesn't allow respect for those that
aren't
> like you.

> >3) Other like-minded individuals don't mind it saying "Jap Cars".

> Yup, other racists--and you seem to willingly put yourself into this
> camp--really don't have any problems with a racist epithet like "Jap."
Hell,
> you're probably pretty pissed that people get mad when you say "***."
I
> mean, that's the proper word for you and other "like-minded individuals."

> >4) I'm not a politician, and I have no desire to coddle whiney little
> >***es or woirry about satisfying some bleeding heart liberal's
> >concept of being politically correct.

> Hmmm.  Well, it's pretty true that those that toss around the term "PC"
are
> using it to support their racism, but John here is refreshingly honest in
just
> how amazingly racist he is.

> -Tim

> I posted a decal I'm using on all my cars in the Sierra NR2K2 paint
> forum, and they deleted the message.

> The decal is the words "JAP CARS", with a red circle around it and a
> slash through the text.

> says...

> > >> Pull your head out of your ass and start thinking like a 'capitalist'
> > >> ignoramus, instead of a 'patriotic' ignoramous.

> > >There's not a damn thing wrong with being patriotic.

> > Well, no, but you're not being patriotic.  You're being xenophobic and
> ***ing
> > ignorant.  But I doubt you could tell the difference.

> Interesting how quickly some people misuse "xenophobic" in such a simple
> situation.  Let me first make a few things clear: (a) I could give two shits
> about NASCAR and US-only cars; (b) I could care less if John's post was
> removed since he has no right to free speech on a privately owned forum.
> My complaint rests squarely on guys like you who take this issue out of
> context so they can use big words like "xenophobic".

> John's point, whether you agree or not, is EXTREMELY simple to grasp.  He
> sees NASCAR as an American institution.  I personally find that silly but
> he's entitled to his belief and I'm not going to debate the merits.  His
> complaint is that allowing foreign cars breaks from TRADITION which he
> reveres.  Again, silly to me but a REASONABLE belief nonetheless and one to
> which he is entitled to passionately support.  More importantly, it is a
> belief that seems honestly fueled by patriotism and respect for tradition.
> He's not worried about: "The Jap-o-nese are comin' in here and takin' jobs
> from good ole God fearin' Americans".

> Any claim that John is xenophobic is truly ignorant.  It's a wonderful
> technique used by the media to spin a bigger story out of a much smaller
> issue; something that should be frowned upon in ng's. ;0)

> >> However, censorship of an opinion simply because it's unpopular is
> >> the first step to fascism.

> > Some of the more vital parts of Fascism are Nationalism, Militarism &
> > Racism.  You are exhibiting at least 2 of those yourself.

>   Where's Papa Doc when you need him.

> > I posted a decal I'm using on all my cars in the Sierra NR2K2 paint
> > forum, and they deleted the message.

> > The decal is the words "JAP CARS", with a red circle around it and a
> > slash through the text.

> I just put a decal on my Mazda. It says 'John Simmons ** a ****'.

> Just exercising my freedom of speech, you understand!

> Sneeringly yours

> GDA

> > says...

> > > >> Pull your head out of your ass and start thinking like a
'capitalist'
> > > >> ignoramus, instead of a 'patriotic' ignoramous.

> > > >There's not a damn thing wrong with being patriotic.

> > > Well, no, but you're not being patriotic.  You're being xenophobic and
> > ***ing
> > > ignorant.  But I doubt you could tell the difference.

> > Interesting how quickly some people misuse "xenophobic" in such a simple
> > situation.  Let me first make a few things clear: (a) I could give two
shits
> > about NASCAR and US-only cars; (b) I could care less if John's post was
> > removed since he has no right to free speech on a privately owned forum.
> > My complaint rests squarely on guys like you who take this issue out of
> > context so they can use big words like "xenophobic".

> > John's point, whether you agree or not, is EXTREMELY simple to grasp.
He
> > sees NASCAR as an American institution.  I personally find that silly
but
> > he's entitled to his belief and I'm not going to debate the merits.  His
> > complaint is that allowing foreign cars breaks from TRADITION which he
> > reveres.  Again, silly to me but a REASONABLE belief nonetheless and one
to
> > which he is entitled to passionately support.  More importantly, it is a
> > belief that seems honestly fueled by patriotism and respect for
tradition.
> > He's not worried about: "The Jap-o-nese are comin' in here and takin'
jobs
> > from good ole God fearin' Americans".

> > Any claim that John is xenophobic is truly ignorant.  It's a wonderful
> > technique used by the media to spin a bigger story out of a much smaller
> > issue; something that should be frowned upon in ng's. ;0)

> I think he's being xenophobic! BTW, xenophobic isn't a very big word by
> my standards anyway. The fact you think it's big speaks volumes about
> you.