Unfortunatly, there isn't too much discussion in other forums about the
progress in Racing Legends. Does anyone know if the developers have taken
advantage of the delay in their work by utilising new technologies such as
hardware Physics Processing Units? This would surely aid their goal of a
truly component based physics model for their cars?
Cheers,
Tim
--
Andi.
Remove only one zero to reply
--
Andi.
Remove only one zero to reply
> --
> Andi.
> Remove only one zero to reply
>> Hi,
>> Unfortunatly, there isn't too much discussion in other forums about the
>> progress in Racing Legends. Does anyone know if the developers have taken
>> advantage of the delay in their work by utilising new technologies such
>> as hardware Physics Processing Units? This would surely aid their goal of
>> a truly component based physics model for their cars?
>> Cheers,
>> Tim
'ot damn! I was thinking the same thing.
Alanb
I think there's exactly the same amount of disucssion as there is
progress ;)
Ash
--
http://www.siroccoracing.com
Much like the "You can be saved" and "Will you go to heaven" posts, RL
urban myth posts are an unfortunate byproduct of everyone having access
to usenet and Google.
As was posted elsewhere in regard to those other topics, "Got Proof?"
> Much like the "You can be saved" and "Will you go to heaven" posts,
RL
> urban myth posts are an unfortunate byproduct of everyone having
access
> to usenet and Google.
> As was posted elsewhere in regard to those other topics, "Got Proof?"
I know first hand how much work Chris, Gregor and Tony are putting into
RL. I don't understand people who state as absolute fact that they
have not made any progress or that they are trying to con us all. What
could they possibly profit by doing that?
Like anything worth doing, RL takes time.
All the best,
Ash
--
http://www.siroccoracing.com
>> Be very, very quiet. I'm hunting wabbits...er, Wests....
>> Much like the "You can be saved" and "Will you go to heaven" posts,
> RL
>> urban myth posts are an unfortunate byproduct of everyone having
> access
>> to usenet and Google.
>> As was posted elsewhere in regard to those other topics, "Got Proof?"
> As the authors of the other topics might reply, "because I speak to
> them every day". ;)
> I know first hand how much work Chris, Gregor and Tony are putting into
> RL. I don't understand people who state as absolute fact that they
> have not made any progress or that they are trying to con us all. What
> could they possibly profit by doing that?
> Like anything worth doing, RL takes time.
> All the best,
> Ash
> --
> http://www.siroccoracing.com
there's been some comments by Chris and me in the latest AutoSimSport
issue. Basically it is felt a PPU would be a great addition, as that is
precisely what would be needed to move things that bit forward, but only
if it allowed for custom programming solutions and would have good
market penetration. So far it's a bit wait and see.
Cheers,
-Gregor
> Unfortunatly, there isn't too much discussion in other forums about the
> progress in Racing Legends. Does anyone know if the developers have taken
> advantage of the delay in their work by utilising new technologies such as
> hardware Physics Processing Units? This would surely aid their goal of a
> truly component based physics model for their cars?
> Cheers,
> Tim
I understand the hestitation - no use going out a limb if the technology
doesn't take off. However, I understand that the PPU has good buy-in from
some of the big names in ***.
I'm happy to see that it has been thought about.
Cheers,
Tim
> there's been some comments by Chris and me in the latest AutoSimSport
> issue. Basically it is felt a PPU would be a great addition, as that is
> precisely what would be needed to move things that bit forward, but only
> if it allowed for custom programming solutions and would have good market
> penetration. So far it's a bit wait and see.
> Cheers,
> -Gregor
>> Hi,
>> Unfortunatly, there isn't too much discussion in other forums about the
>> progress in Racing Legends. Does anyone know if the developers have taken
>> advantage of the delay in their work by utilising new technologies such
>> as hardware Physics Processing Units? This would surely aid their goal of
>> a truly component based physics model for their cars?
>> Cheers,
>> Tim
Bruce.
www.autosimsport.com
Jon.
> I understand the hestitation - no use going out a limb if the technology
> doesn't take off. However, I understand that the PPU has good buy-in from
> some of the big names in ***.
> I'm happy to see that it has been thought about.
> Cheers,
> Tim
> > Hello,
> > there's been some comments by Chris and me in the latest AutoSimSport
> > issue. Basically it is felt a PPU would be a great addition, as that is
> > precisely what would be needed to move things that bit forward, but only
> > if it allowed for custom programming solutions and would have good
market
> > penetration. So far it's a bit wait and see.
> > Cheers,
> > -Gregor
> >> Hi,
> >> Unfortunatly, there isn't too much discussion in other forums about the
> >> progress in Racing Legends. Does anyone know if the developers have
taken
> >> advantage of the delay in their work by utilising new technologies such
> >> as hardware Physics Processing Units? This would surely aid their goal
of
> >> a truly component based physics model for their cars?
> >> Cheers,
> >> Tim
The Wests put themselves in that position. They announced the game at
LEAST four years ago, and we're all still waiting around to see
something more tangible than a few 3D models. Further, activity on their
website is restricted to the forums where racing anarchists have even
lost interest in talking about RL, and instead are talking about other
racing games. Where are the Wests? Probably out looking for a
replacement for their cat...
> > I don't understand people who state as absolute fact that they
> > have not made any progress or that they are trying to con us all.
> The Wests put themselves in that position. They announced the game at
> LEAST four years ago, and we're all still waiting around to see
> something more tangible than a few 3D models. Further, activity on
their
> website is restricted to the forums where racing anarchists have even
> lost interest in talking about RL, and instead are talking about
other
> racing games. Where are the Wests? Probably out looking for a
> replacement for their cat...
Nothing like a good flamewar. Should I just question your parentage
now and get it over with?
All that turning left has made you dizzy methinks :)
All the best,
Ash
--
http://www.siroccoracing.com <-- heavily out of date, but i'm still
working on it honest.
