rec.autos.simulators

Daytona Qual Experiment

The Other Larr

Daytona Qual Experiment

by The Other Larr » Sat, 06 Jul 2002 12:59:51

Ok, I did a Qual experiment at Daytona, and here are the results.

First, there is NO WAY you are going to blow up during qual with the fast
setup.  First off, they have the grille opened up wide.  Secondly, the
gearing is so high that you won't break 6300 rpm the whole run.

Secondly, I proved that the "Throw away the first lap" doesn't work, at
least not with this setup.

With "First Lap give up method" - 50.770.

Normal run, at racing line all 3 laps - 50.177.

I have no doubt many can beat these qual times.  My SS quals have sucked
since N4 came out.  I used to be a pole-sitter all the time before N4/N2002.
I haven't figured out the trick these other guys are using to beat everyone
by a second or two...

However, it's good enough to determine that you won't blow up no matter
which method you use, nor is there an reason to throw away the first lap.

-Larry

Bamada

Daytona Qual Experiment

by Bamada » Sat, 06 Jul 2002 13:29:12

Same situation here. glad to hear it ain't just me :)  Now... in RASCAR do we
qualify with the <fast> setup or the stock <qualify> setup?
Dan

John Pancoas

Daytona Qual Experiment

by John Pancoas » Sat, 06 Jul 2002 13:52:02


  You qualify with the same setup you race; the fast.  And it won't go much
above 6300 rpm anyway before it redlines, which it will do a lot in traffic.

John

Bamada

Daytona Qual Experiment

by Bamada » Sat, 06 Jul 2002 15:08:04

Thanks John. Powered by Briggs & Stratton
Dan

Brad Larocqu

Daytona Qual Experiment

by Brad Larocqu » Sat, 06 Jul 2002 16:32:53

I have a question about Daytona in N4

I noticed the pole speed for the 500 and 400 in 2001 were only 183.xxx.
So I adjust the ai drag in the track.ini file to match real world times.
But of course my car isnt affected in the same manner and I still run
187-187 with the fast setup. What can I adjust so my car is equally
affected by the new drag setting like the ai's?


>>You qualify with the same setup you race; the fast.

> Thanks John. Powered by Briggs & Stratton
> Dan

John Pancoas

Daytona Qual Experiment

by John Pancoas » Sat, 06 Jul 2002 21:50:31

  Not sure, but dig around in your player.ini file for something.

John


> I have a question about Daytona in N4

> I noticed the pole speed for the 500 and 400 in 2001 were only 183.xxx.
> So I adjust the ai drag in the track.ini file to match real world times.
> But of course my car isnt affected in the same manner and I still run
> 187-187 with the fast setup. What can I adjust so my car is equally
> affected by the new drag setting like the ai's?


> >>You qualify with the same setup you race; the fast.

> > Thanks John. Powered by Briggs & Stratton
> > Dan

Schoone

Daytona Qual Experiment

by Schoone » Sat, 06 Jul 2002 22:01:19

What weather settings are you using for these tests?



The Other Larr

Daytona Qual Experiment

by The Other Larr » Sun, 07 Jul 2002 04:17:49

Fast, as far as I know.

-Larry


The Other Larr

Daytona Qual Experiment

by The Other Larr » Sun, 07 Jul 2002 04:19:07

Defaults.

70 deg., weather whatever the game sets as default.

-Larry


> What weather settings are you using for these tests?



> > Ok, I did a Qual experiment at Daytona, and here are the results.

> > First, there is NO WAY you are going to blow up during qual with the
fast
> > setup.  First off, they have the grille opened up wide.  Secondly, the
> > gearing is so high that you won't break 6300 rpm the whole run.

> > Secondly, I proved that the "Throw away the first lap" doesn't work, at
> > least not with this setup.

> > With "First Lap give up method" - 50.770.

> > Normal run, at racing line all 3 laps - 50.177.

> > I have no doubt many can beat these qual times.  My SS quals have sucked
> > since N4 came out.  I used to be a pole-sitter all the time before
> N4/N2002.
> > I haven't figured out the trick these other guys are using to beat
> everyone
> > by a second or two...

> > However, it's good enough to determine that you won't blow up no matter
> > which method you use, nor is there an reason to throw away the first
lap.

> > -Larry

Tom Pabs

Daytona Qual Experiment

by Tom Pabs » Mon, 08 Jul 2002 01:17:45

Larry...

If you watched Daytona qual yesterday....for the Pepsi 400.....you might
have seen a few drivers "not" run a one lap throwaway....one lap go for
it.....qual run, although most of them did.

If you use a low 4th gear.....you need the throwaway lap to build up speed.
Your first timed lap will be about .5 to .8 secs slower than the second lap
run down on the bottom.  With the "fast" default......the gearing is
designed to get you to max speed within the outlap run and both your timed
laps will be pretty much at max speed....so only the line you take will
effect your lap time.  Hope this makes sense?

I usually get the same times as you list below with the default
"fast"....but on the occasional run....can get below 50's (49.8xx) with the
line.........allowing the car to free-wheel through the turns.  But, this
requires a perfect entry.....where no adjustments are required through the
turn.  Can't do it very often....but occasionally I pull it off.  I think
you will see the same results if you keep making qual runs.  Its very hard
to get it just perfect on entry.

Of course, temps and wind effect the times you run.....so when looking at
qual times posted on the net.....you must see what the weather settings were
in order to make comparisons to your times.  If the weather isn't
listed....you can't really compare.

You should find all of this pretty much "ditto" at Tally.

Regards,

Tom



The Other Larr

Daytona Qual Experiment

by The Other Larr » Mon, 08 Jul 2002 12:11:52

Tom,

I know how the one-lap throwaway works.  I used it to win some 80 poles in
the days of TEN and later on WON.

However, especially with the fixed FAST setup we run in RASCAR, it doesn't
work any more and, indeed, results in a slower overall second lap time.

-Larry


> Larry...

> If you watched Daytona qual yesterday....for the Pepsi 400.....you might
> have seen a few drivers "not" run a one lap throwaway....one lap go for
> it.....qual run, although most of them did.

> If you use a low 4th gear.....you need the throwaway lap to build up
speed.
> Your first timed lap will be about .5 to .8 secs slower than the second
lap
> run down on the bottom.  With the "fast" default......the gearing is
> designed to get you to max speed within the outlap run and both your timed
> laps will be pretty much at max speed....so only the line you take will
> effect your lap time.  Hope this makes sense?

> I usually get the same times as you list below with the default
> "fast"....but on the occasional run....can get below 50's (49.8xx) with
the
> line.........allowing the car to free-wheel through the turns.  But, this
> requires a perfect entry.....where no adjustments are required through the
> turn.  Can't do it very often....but occasionally I pull it off.  I think
> you will see the same results if you keep making qual runs.  Its very hard
> to get it just perfect on entry.

> Of course, temps and wind effect the times you run.....so when looking at
> qual times posted on the net.....you must see what the weather settings
were
> in order to make comparisons to your times.  If the weather isn't
> listed....you can't really compare.

> You should find all of this pretty much "ditto" at Tally.

> Regards,

> Tom



> > Ok, I did a Qual experiment at Daytona, and here are the results.

> > First, there is NO WAY you are going to blow up during qual with the
fast
> > setup.  First off, they have the grille opened up wide.  Secondly, the
> > gearing is so high that you won't break 6300 rpm the whole run.

> > Secondly, I proved that the "Throw away the first lap" doesn't work, at
> > least not with this setup.

> > With "First Lap give up method" - 50.770.

> > Normal run, at racing line all 3 laps - 50.177.

> > I have no doubt many can beat these qual times.  My SS quals have sucked
> > since N4 came out.  I used to be a pole-sitter all the time before
> N4/N2002.
> > I haven't figured out the trick these other guys are using to beat
> everyone
> > by a second or two...

> > However, it's good enough to determine that you won't blow up no matter
> > which method you use, nor is there an reason to throw away the first
lap.

> > -Larry

Don Burnett

Daytona Qual Experiment

by Don Burnett » Mon, 08 Jul 2002 12:40:16

I don't know, I got the outside starting position today running my first lap
as a throw away lap.. I always seem to qualify well at the plate tracks
doing this..
Now if my connection had only co--operated :(.

Don Burnette



> Tom,

> I know how the one-lap throwaway works.  I used it to win some 80 poles in
> the days of TEN and later on WON.

> However, especially with the fixed FAST setup we run in RASCAR, it doesn't
> work any more and, indeed, results in a slower overall second lap time.

> -Larry



> > Larry...

> > If you watched Daytona qual yesterday....for the Pepsi 400.....you might
> > have seen a few drivers "not" run a one lap throwaway....one lap go for
> > it.....qual run, although most of them did.

> > If you use a low 4th gear.....you need the throwaway lap to build up
> speed.
> > Your first timed lap will be about .5 to .8 secs slower than the second
> lap
> > run down on the bottom.  With the "fast" default......the gearing is
> > designed to get you to max speed within the outlap run and both your
timed
> > laps will be pretty much at max speed....so only the line you take will
> > effect your lap time.  Hope this makes sense?

> > I usually get the same times as you list below with the default
> > "fast"....but on the occasional run....can get below 50's (49.8xx) with
> the
> > line.........allowing the car to free-wheel through the turns.  But,
this
> > requires a perfect entry.....where no adjustments are required through
the
> > turn.  Can't do it very often....but occasionally I pull it off.  I
think
> > you will see the same results if you keep making qual runs.  Its very
hard
> > to get it just perfect on entry.

> > Of course, temps and wind effect the times you run.....so when looking
at
> > qual times posted on the net.....you must see what the weather settings
> were
> > in order to make comparisons to your times.  If the weather isn't
> > listed....you can't really compare.

> > You should find all of this pretty much "ditto" at Tally.

> > Regards,

> > Tom



> > > Ok, I did a Qual experiment at Daytona, and here are the results.

> > > First, there is NO WAY you are going to blow up during qual with the
> fast
> > > setup.  First off, they have the grille opened up wide.  Secondly, the
> > > gearing is so high that you won't break 6300 rpm the whole run.

> > > Secondly, I proved that the "Throw away the first lap" doesn't work,
at
> > > least not with this setup.

> > > With "First Lap give up method" - 50.770.

> > > Normal run, at racing line all 3 laps - 50.177.

> > > I have no doubt many can beat these qual times.  My SS quals have
sucked
> > > since N4 came out.  I used to be a pole-sitter all the time before
> > N4/N2002.
> > > I haven't figured out the trick these other guys are using to beat
> > everyone
> > > by a second or two...

> > > However, it's good enough to determine that you won't blow up no
matter
> > > which method you use, nor is there an reason to throw away the first
> lap.

> > > -Larry

The Other Larr

Daytona Qual Experiment

by The Other Larr » Mon, 08 Jul 2002 13:12:37

Hmmm.... Well, maybe after 5 years I've just forgotten how to do it :)

I haven't been able to qual worth a hoot since N4 came out anyway...

-Larry


> I don't know, I got the outside starting position today running my first
lap
> as a throw away lap.. I always seem to qualify well at the plate tracks
> doing this..
> Now if my connection had only co--operated :(.

> Don Burnette



> > Tom,

> > I know how the one-lap throwaway works.  I used it to win some 80 poles
in
> > the days of TEN and later on WON.

> > However, especially with the fixed FAST setup we run in RASCAR, it
doesn't
> > work any more and, indeed, results in a slower overall second lap time.

> > -Larry



> > > Larry...

> > > If you watched Daytona qual yesterday....for the Pepsi 400.....you
might
> > > have seen a few drivers "not" run a one lap throwaway....one lap go
for
> > > it.....qual run, although most of them did.

> > > If you use a low 4th gear.....you need the throwaway lap to build up
> > speed.
> > > Your first timed lap will be about .5 to .8 secs slower than the
second
> > lap
> > > run down on the bottom.  With the "fast" default......the gearing is
> > > designed to get you to max speed within the outlap run and both your
> timed
> > > laps will be pretty much at max speed....so only the line you take
will
> > > effect your lap time.  Hope this makes sense?

> > > I usually get the same times as you list below with the default
> > > "fast"....but on the occasional run....can get below 50's (49.8xx)
with
> > the
> > > line.........allowing the car to free-wheel through the turns.  But,
> this
> > > requires a perfect entry.....where no adjustments are required through
> the
> > > turn.  Can't do it very often....but occasionally I pull it off.  I
> think
> > > you will see the same results if you keep making qual runs.  Its very
> hard
> > > to get it just perfect on entry.

> > > Of course, temps and wind effect the times you run.....so when looking
> at
> > > qual times posted on the net.....you must see what the weather
settings
> > were
> > > in order to make comparisons to your times.  If the weather isn't
> > > listed....you can't really compare.

> > > You should find all of this pretty much "ditto" at Tally.

> > > Regards,

> > > Tom



> > > > Ok, I did a Qual experiment at Daytona, and here are the results.

> > > > First, there is NO WAY you are going to blow up during qual with the
> > fast
> > > > setup.  First off, they have the grille opened up wide.  Secondly,
the
> > > > gearing is so high that you won't break 6300 rpm the whole run.

> > > > Secondly, I proved that the "Throw away the first lap" doesn't work,
> at
> > > > least not with this setup.

> > > > With "First Lap give up method" - 50.770.

> > > > Normal run, at racing line all 3 laps - 50.177.

> > > > I have no doubt many can beat these qual times.  My SS quals have
> sucked
> > > > since N4 came out.  I used to be a pole-sitter all the time before
> > > N4/N2002.
> > > > I haven't figured out the trick these other guys are using to beat
> > > everyone
> > > > by a second or two...

> > > > However, it's good enough to determine that you won't blow up no
> matter
> > > > which method you use, nor is there an reason to throw away the first
> > lap.

> > > > -Larry

Tom Pabs

Daytona Qual Experiment

by Tom Pabs » Mon, 08 Jul 2002 14:41:33

Gosh Larry, I probably wasn't very clear about the point I was wanting to
make.....I know you know "how it works"......I was trying to explain/account
for why it appeared not to work in N2K2 during your "experiment."

Let me try a different approach:
With no "qual motor" in N2K2...its strictly a gearing issue....a low 4th
gear gets the car to max speed during the warm-up lap....thus the high-line
throwaway lap doesn't get more speed out of the car on the second lap.
However, if you run a very high 4th gear....then you must run the throwaway
or your lap time in the second lap is slow.  That was the "point" I was
trying to make.....to account for the results of your experiment.  I think
its not an issue of whether it works or not....but whether its needed or not
needed.  And that depends on the gearing you've chosen for your qual setup.

Here's an idea.  Take the "fast" setup.......go two clicks higher gear on
4th.....then make some qual runs with both methods and see which produces
the faster times.  My bet is that the "throwaway" method will.  But, I could
be wrong about that......its just a guess.

Tom



> Tom,

> I know how the one-lap throwaway works.  I used it to win some 80 poles in
> the days of TEN and later on WON.

> However, especially with the fixed FAST setup we run in RASCAR, it doesn't
> work any more and, indeed, results in a slower overall second lap time.

> -Larry



> > Larry...

> > If you watched Daytona qual yesterday....for the Pepsi 400.....you might
> > have seen a few drivers "not" run a one lap throwaway....one lap go for
> > it.....qual run, although most of them did.

> > If you use a low 4th gear.....you need the throwaway lap to build up
> speed.
> > Your first timed lap will be about .5 to .8 secs slower than the second
> lap
> > run down on the bottom.  With the "fast" default......the gearing is
> > designed to get you to max speed within the outlap run and both your
timed
> > laps will be pretty much at max speed....so only the line you take will
> > effect your lap time.  Hope this makes sense?

> > I usually get the same times as you list below with the default
> > "fast"....but on the occasional run....can get below 50's (49.8xx) with
> the
> > line.........allowing the car to free-wheel through the turns.  But,
this
> > requires a perfect entry.....where no adjustments are required through
the
> > turn.  Can't do it very often....but occasionally I pull it off.  I
think
> > you will see the same results if you keep making qual runs.  Its very
hard
> > to get it just perfect on entry.

> > Of course, temps and wind effect the times you run.....so when looking
at
> > qual times posted on the net.....you must see what the weather settings
> were
> > in order to make comparisons to your times.  If the weather isn't
> > listed....you can't really compare.

> > You should find all of this pretty much "ditto" at Tally.

> > Regards,

> > Tom



> > > Ok, I did a Qual experiment at Daytona, and here are the results.

> > > First, there is NO WAY you are going to blow up during qual with the
> fast
> > > setup.  First off, they have the grille opened up wide.  Secondly, the
> > > gearing is so high that you won't break 6300 rpm the whole run.

> > > Secondly, I proved that the "Throw away the first lap" doesn't work,
at
> > > least not with this setup.

> > > With "First Lap give up method" - 50.770.

> > > Normal run, at racing line all 3 laps - 50.177.

> > > I have no doubt many can beat these qual times.  My SS quals have
sucked
> > > since N4 came out.  I used to be a pole-sitter all the time before
> > N4/N2002.
> > > I haven't figured out the trick these other guys are using to beat
> > everyone
> > > by a second or two...

> > > However, it's good enough to determine that you won't blow up no
matter
> > > which method you use, nor is there an reason to throw away the first
> lap.

> > > -Larry

The Other Larr

Daytona Qual Experiment

by The Other Larr » Tue, 09 Jul 2002 03:12:36

Tom,

I understand.  But we run fixed FAST setups.  I cannot alter that.

I don't disagree that with open setups, this can be made to work, however I
still contend that the effect isn't as pronounced as it used to be.

This may be entirely due to the lousy aero package for the SS these days.  I
really missed the days of laying the spoiler back to 40 :)

-Larry


> Gosh Larry, I probably wasn't very clear about the point I was wanting to
> make.....I know you know "how it works"......I was trying to
explain/account
> for why it appeared not to work in N2K2 during your "experiment."

> Let me try a different approach:
> With no "qual motor" in N2K2...its strictly a gearing issue....a low 4th
> gear gets the car to max speed during the warm-up lap....thus the
high-line
> throwaway lap doesn't get more speed out of the car on the second lap.
> However, if you run a very high 4th gear....then you must run the
throwaway
> or your lap time in the second lap is slow.  That was the "point" I was
> trying to make.....to account for the results of your experiment.  I think
> its not an issue of whether it works or not....but whether its needed or
not
> needed.  And that depends on the gearing you've chosen for your qual
setup.

> Here's an idea.  Take the "fast" setup.......go two clicks higher gear on
> 4th.....then make some qual runs with both methods and see which produces
> the faster times.  My bet is that the "throwaway" method will.  But, I
could
> be wrong about that......its just a guess.

> Tom



> > Tom,

> > I know how the one-lap throwaway works.  I used it to win some 80 poles
in
> > the days of TEN and later on WON.

> > However, especially with the fixed FAST setup we run in RASCAR, it
doesn't
> > work any more and, indeed, results in a slower overall second lap time.

> > -Larry



> > > Larry...

> > > If you watched Daytona qual yesterday....for the Pepsi 400.....you
might
> > > have seen a few drivers "not" run a one lap throwaway....one lap go
for
> > > it.....qual run, although most of them did.

> > > If you use a low 4th gear.....you need the throwaway lap to build up
> > speed.
> > > Your first timed lap will be about .5 to .8 secs slower than the
second
> > lap
> > > run down on the bottom.  With the "fast" default......the gearing is
> > > designed to get you to max speed within the outlap run and both your
> timed
> > > laps will be pretty much at max speed....so only the line you take
will
> > > effect your lap time.  Hope this makes sense?

> > > I usually get the same times as you list below with the default
> > > "fast"....but on the occasional run....can get below 50's (49.8xx)
with
> > the
> > > line.........allowing the car to free-wheel through the turns.  But,
> this
> > > requires a perfect entry.....where no adjustments are required through
> the
> > > turn.  Can't do it very often....but occasionally I pull it off.  I
> think
> > > you will see the same results if you keep making qual runs.  Its very
> hard
> > > to get it just perfect on entry.

> > > Of course, temps and wind effect the times you run.....so when looking
> at
> > > qual times posted on the net.....you must see what the weather
settings
> > were
> > > in order to make comparisons to your times.  If the weather isn't
> > > listed....you can't really compare.

> > > You should find all of this pretty much "ditto" at Tally.

> > > Regards,

> > > Tom



> > > > Ok, I did a Qual experiment at Daytona, and here are the results.

> > > > First, there is NO WAY you are going to blow up during qual with the
> > fast
> > > > setup.  First off, they have the grille opened up wide.  Secondly,
the
> > > > gearing is so high that you won't break 6300 rpm the whole run.

> > > > Secondly, I proved that the "Throw away the first lap" doesn't work,
> at
> > > > least not with this setup.

> > > > With "First Lap give up method" - 50.770.

> > > > Normal run, at racing line all 3 laps - 50.177.

> > > > I have no doubt many can beat these qual times.  My SS quals have
> sucked
> > > > since N4 came out.  I used to be a pole-sitter all the time before
> > > N4/N2002.
> > > > I haven't figured out the trick these other guys are using to beat
> > > everyone
> > > > by a second or two...

> > > > However, it's good enough to determine that you won't blow up no
> matter
> > > > which method you use, nor is there an reason to throw away the first
> > lap.

> > > > -Larry


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.