rec.autos.simulators

>Which one?  The "CART Games" refers to their internal games (fan stuff) I
>believe.  But no question CART should be PAYING Papy to do a good sim. and
>hand it out at events (like Daytona did with NASCAR Racing).  If they gave
>up all the licensing bullshit fees and actually paid for the sim (which
>would amount to about .1% of even their new reduced promotions budget), but
>then got a share of sales revenue and got to use it for their own promo
>purposes, too, they would be ahead in the end.

> On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 17:08:32 -0500, "Marc Collins"

> >Which one?  The "CART Games" refers to their internal games (fan stuff) I
> >believe.  But no question CART should be PAYING Papy to do a good sim.
and
> >hand it out at events (like Daytona did with NASCAR Racing).  If they
gave
> >up all the licensing bullshit fees and actually paid for the sim (which
> >would amount to about .1% of even their new reduced promotions budget),
but
> >then got a share of sales revenue and got to use it for their own promo
> >purposes, too, they would be ahead in the end.

> I agree.  I think it would help the sport if, when they do the
> re-launch that Pook has been discussing for 2005, it was accompanied
> by a brand new CART simulator.  I'm not saying that's the sole answer
> to CART's marketing woes, but surely the Nascar Racing series has made
> fans out of many people who didn't care for the sport at all.

> Jason