rec.autos.simulators

GP2 - Why keyboard?

Colin J. Stuckles

GP2 - Why keyboard?

by Colin J. Stuckles » Sun, 11 Aug 1996 04:00:00

I find it interesting to check the newsgroups and the
GP2 web pages to compare my GP2 times to those on the
net.

However, I almost always find that the people posting
low times are using the keyboard, and hence steering
help. While I can understand someone using keyboard
if that's all the have available, but I find it hard
to believe that none of these people have a $30 analog
joystick or even a $20 digital gamepad.  What's the
fun in playing with a keyboard when you end up
driving around the track in a totally unrealistic
manner when you could have at least the reasonable
feel of the analog joystick control (for those of
us who can't afford or justify a T2, etc)?

I've gotten as low as in the 1:29s at Monza with a
Gravis Analog Pro with no driving aids - and
I know I can get it down to a 1:26 or 1:27,
but these 1:22 times seem out of my reach.

Cheers,

--
Colin Stuckless

Memorial University of Newfoundland

Michael E. Carv

GP2 - Why keyboard?

by Michael E. Carv » Mon, 12 Aug 1996 04:00:00


[snip]
: I've gotten as low as in the 1:29s at Monza with a
: Gravis Analog Pro with no driving aids - and
: I know I can get it down to a 1:26 or 1:27,
: but these 1:22 times seem out of my reach.

I also am struggling to a degree.  I've decided to stick with Monza
until I learn some more setup tricks.  I've been able to get down to
1:25.648 (using a T1 & NO driving aids).  Now I am ready to dig deeper
into the Advanced setup.  I tried a few laps with steering help, just to
see the difference.  This makes it way too easy to do hot laps, but makes
it impossible to really simulate driving a F1 car.

Out of curiousity, I also tried a Hotlap setup and found it impossible
to drive without any aids.  I actually did worse than with my setup.  

Until someone starts posting Hotlaps with no aids and for Joystick &
Wheels, everyone will want to work on beating the best times period
(which will always be keyboard w/aids).  Now I'm not knocking
keyboarders.  They have their reasons.  But, if one can afford a
joystick or wheel, this is the only way to go.

There also seems to be 2 major camps when it comes down to all of the
sims.  Those who just work on going fast and those who work on the whole
racing experience.  I for one don't see the joy in just being able to
run the fastest.  I'm looking for speed and handling that will get me
through a 100% race.  While there is something to be gained by
"hotlapping", most of it doesn't translate to racing.  Take a look at Al
Unser, Jr.  He hardly ever qualifies well, but when it comes to race day
watch out!
--
**************************** Michael E. Carver *************************
     Upside out, or inside down...False alarm the only game in town.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<[ /./.  [-  < ]>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Julian Lov

GP2 - Why keyboard?

by Julian Lov » Mon, 12 Aug 1996 04:00:00



> [snip]
> : I've gotten as low as in the 1:29s at Monza with a
> : Gravis Analog Pro with no driving aids - and
> : I know I can get it down to a 1:26 or 1:27,
> : but these 1:22 times seem out of my reach.

> I also am struggling to a degree.  I've decided to stick with Monza
> until I learn some more setup tricks.  I've been able to get down to
> 1:25.648 (using a T1 & NO driving aids).  Now I am ready to dig deeper
> into the Advanced setup.  

This is my Monza setup - I can manage 1.23.809 with it, using a joystick
and nothing but throttle help. It has quite a lot of oversteer though, so
you have to be careful. If anyone knows how to cure it I would be
grateful...

On a related note - to all you GP2 web page owners - can you have
different sections for joystick/wheel and keyboard setups, as keyboard
setups are useless for people using analogue control methods.

Here's the setup:

Wings:  06F/01R
Gears:  28,35,42,49,56,65
Brake Bias: 62.000 %F
Anti-roll F:  3000 lbs
Anti-roll R:   100 lbs
                LF    RF    LR    RR
Packers:        40    40    55    55
Fast Bump:       7     7     3     3
Fast Rebound:    4     4     2     2
Slow Bump:      24    24    12    12
Slow Rebound:   16    16     8     8
Spring Rate:  1300  1300   700   700  (lbs)
Ride Height:  20.0  20.0  45.0  45.0  (mm)

I'll also attatch it in .uue format too, as its only little...

Julian
_____________________________________________________________________

                                University of Oxford

[ MONZQUA1.UUE < 1K ]
[ Section: 1/1  File: monzqual.csl  Encoder: Wincode v1.4 ]
Original Input File Size: 84

begin 644 monzqual.csl


`
end
end

[ Section: 1/1  File: monzqual.csl  Encoder: Wincode v1.4 ]

marco kley

GP2 - Why keyboard?

by marco kley » Mon, 12 Aug 1996 04:00:00


> I find it interesting to check the newsgroups and the
> GP2 web pages to compare my GP2 times to those on the
> net.

> However, I almost always find that the people posting
> low times are using the keyboard, and hence steering
> help. While I can understand someone using keyboard
> if that's all the have available, but I find it hard
> to believe that none of these people have a $30 analog
> joystick or even a $20 digital gamepad.  What's the
> fun in playing with a keyboard when you end up
> driving around the track in a totally unrealistic
> manner when you could have at least the reasonable
> feel of the analog joystick control (for those of
> us who can't afford or justify a T2, etc)?

> I've gotten as low as in the 1:29s at Monza with a
> Gravis Analog Pro with no driving aids - and
> I know I can get it down to a 1:26 or 1:27,
> but these 1:22 times seem out of my reach.

> Cheers,

> --
> Colin Stuckless

> Memorial University of Newfoundland

I also have a gravis analog pro joystick and i got 1.23.175 at monza
with only throttle help on (with no help i got a 1.23.430). I think if i
practised more i could get this time down to a 1.22.7.

regards,

Marco

Richard Walk

GP2 - Why keyboard?

by Richard Walk » Tue, 13 Aug 1996 04:00:00



Especially on the last lap <g>

Richard

Richard Walk

GP2 - Why keyboard?

by Richard Walk » Tue, 13 Aug 1996 04:00:00



I've managed a 1:23.308 at Monza and a 1:23.792 at Silverstone with a
"wheel" / pedal combo and no steering help or driving aids. It _is_
possible, but it takes a _lot_ of practice, some experimentation with
the set-ups & no social life whatsoever <VBG>

If you would like a copy of my setups for the above circuits, just
drop me an email.

Steering help setups tend to have ridiculous amounts of oversteer.

I've been having a look at the racing scene over on Compuserve & there
are some really quick guys there. One bloke has just posted a
1:15.987 at Hungary (no aids) and there are some incredible times at
Adelaide as well.

There's a lot to be said for both approaches. I find getting a
consistent setup for a race very hard and concentrating for a full
100% race is very difficult. But at the end of the day, all you've
managed is to beat another computer program. With hotlaps, I am not
competing against the PC, but against real humans - all be it in a
rather stilted manner. The ideal would be Hawaii (or a ICR, GP2
variant), but I just can't afford those international calls :(

Richard

Dave 'Gizmo' Gym

GP2 - Why keyboard?

by Dave 'Gizmo' Gym » Sat, 17 Aug 1996 04:00:00

Preliminary data from HOF2 strongly supports the view that the fastest
way around a GP2 track is with a wheel and pedals and no helps other
than opposite lock. The keyboard is NOT faster, unlike F1GP.

Using a joystick without steering help is almost certainly doomed to
failure. Lock to lock of a few inches? I think not.

Now it's my turn to call all the people who accused we of the steering
help on club of cheating of cheating themselves, by using opp lock
help. *big grin*

I'll release the data as part of HOF2 at some point in the future.
--

Piers Samwell-Smit

GP2 - Why keyboard?

by Piers Samwell-Smit » Sat, 17 Aug 1996 04:00:00



Well I seem to manage.

--
Suck The Goat

MalSo

GP2 - Why keyboard?

by MalSo » Sun, 18 Aug 1996 04:00:00

: > Using a joystick without steering help is almost certainly doomed to
: > failure. Lock to lock of a few inches? I think not.

those few inches are amplified by the sensitivty decrease with speed option.
its not so impossible, think about it

-------
Carlos Ribas
President
MalSoft
http://www.nol.net/~draconis

Thomas Krei

GP2 - Why keyboard?

by Thomas Krei » Sun, 18 Aug 1996 04:00:00



Could it be, that people who spend lots of time playing a raceing sim, mostly
spend some money on a wheel ? These guys exercise more than other, and cause
of that, they are faster.

Cheers Thomas
--- Get up, dive down, no problem

Hen

GP2 - Why keyboard?

by Hen » Tue, 20 Aug 1996 04:00:00


> Using a joystick without steering help is almost certainly doomed to
> failure. Lock to lock of a few inches? I think not.

I don't know about that ... I've done 1:16.284 in Monaco which seems
to be faster that the current entry in your HOF2 ... and that's with
NO HELPS AT ALL and a tiny little joystick ...

Maybe you should ask before speaking against better knowledge ..

> --


--
Henrikki (Hena) Hakkanen               Tel. +358-(9)0-345 5538

------- The best way to accelerate a Mac is 9.81 m/s2 --------
--------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are mine and does not
            necessarily reflect those of my employer!

Nicola Salmor

GP2 - Why keyboard?

by Nicola Salmor » Tue, 20 Aug 1996 04:00:00


Up to now I've raced only at Monza and Monaco, and after tweaking with
the sensitivity values I find the joystick quite confortable. I have
disabled all driving aids, opposite lock included. My best times are
1.22.3 at Monza and 1.17.3 at Monaco - obtained in qualifying, so not
comparable with the ones in HOF2.

I am under the impression that GP2 increases the max lock in tight
corners (like Loews) WRT the one selected in the control options. But I
could be wrong.

Nicola Salmoria

John Wallac

GP2 - Why keyboard?

by John Wallac » Tue, 20 Aug 1996 04:00:00



So just think how fast you could be with a wheel..... ;)  Whether it's
faster or not, it's more realistic and more fun.

Cheers!
John

PS - Nice time BTW!
                     _________________________________
         __    _____|                                 |_____    __
________|  |__|    :|           John Wallace          |     |__|  |________

  \    :|  |::|    :|        Team WW Racing TSW       |     |::|  |     /
    >  :|  |::|    :|_________________________________|     |::|  |   <
  /    :|__|::|____/       * Sim Racing News *         \____|::|__|     \
/______:/  \::/ http://sneezy.dcn.ed.ac.uk/simnews/index.htm \::/  \._____\
               http://www.math.ohio-state.edu/~harmon/simnews

Gertjan Westene

GP2 - Why keyboard?

by Gertjan Westene » Wed, 21 Aug 1996 04:00:00





>>Preliminary data from HOF2 strongly supports the view that the fastest
>>way around a GP2 track is with a wheel and pedals and no helps other
>>than opposite lock. The keyboard is NOT faster, unlike F1GP.

>Could it be, that people who spend lots of time playing a raceing sim, mostly
>spend some money on a wheel ? These guys exercise more than other, and cause
>of that, they are faster.

could be. I heard about people driving 1:21 's at Monza with joystick. So
you can get fast times without a wheel.

_____________________________________________________________________
   _______     _                   _
 /         \    \                 /
|                \               /          Twente University
|      ___        \             /            The Netherlands

|          |        \   / \   /
 \ ________/ertjan   \_/   \_/esteneng
_____________________________________________________________________

Hen

GP2 - Why keyboard?

by Hen » Thu, 22 Aug 1996 04:00:00




> >I don't know about that ... I've done 1:16.284 in Monaco which seems
> >to be faster that the current entry in your HOF2 ... and that's with
> >NO HELPS AT ALL and a tiny little joystick ...

> So just think how fast you could be with a wheel..... ;)  Whether it's
> faster or not, it's more realistic and more fun.

As a matter of fact, I think that all the time! My current budget
doesn't
cut me any slack to buy a decent wheel, though :-(

Thanks!

--
Henrikki (Hena) Hakkanen               Tel. +358-(9)0-345 5538

------- The best way to accelerate a Mac is 9.81 m/s2 --------
--------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are mine and does not
            necessarily reflect those of my employer!


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.