More sophisticated calculations certainly doesn't equal negative to me. I
was happy to buy GPL even though I knew I could only take advantage of it
fully on a future system. If NR2002 has some sort of super advanced physics
and AI that require more computing power, more power to Papy. I think it is
simple, really...are these the frame rates we can expect in the final (I
doubt it)? There certainly doesn't SEEM to be enough changed/improved to
warrant the drop, but there may be lots we can't see...yet :)
Marc
> You actually expect an answer to those questions Marc? They might
comment
> on the d3d/opengl but if you think they will comment on items that might
be
> taken negatively, then I hope you are not holding your breath. :)
> Happy New Year.
> dave henrie
> > You are right, Eric...it's only logical that you can't have a window
> larger
> > than your desktop--at least not one that is going to be useful!!
> > Can you tell us whether the final 2002 will have OpenGL and whether it
is
> > true that the D3D version generally has better frame rates in windowed
> mode?
> > Also, are the dramatically lower frame rates most are experiencing just
a
> > result of this being an early build? The graphics don't look any better
> on
> > my system (1600 x 1200 16 bit) than N4, so I am hoping that I don't need
> > something faster than my P4 2.0GHz to run 2002 with a full field.
> > Basically, is it an early build or are there some other more
sophisticated
> > calculations going on somewhere that account for the drop?