>>Joe does make some good points in his article. The fact that you have to
>>upgrade on a annual basis if you want to play the newest games (decently) is
>>very close to the truth.
>Hi Nightsky,
>Thanks very much for your constructive comments in this thread.
>Actually, the quote above is really what I was alluding to. I did not
>mean to imply that old games are not worth playing. One of my favorite
>sports sims of all time is the circa-1988 Amiga version of Wayne
>Gretzky Hockey. And I have found few arcade racers as much fun as the
>original version of Need for Speed.
>The point I was trying to make is that any serious gamer will want to
>play at least SOME new games, and that requires fairly up-to-date
>hardware. Thanks again for your comments!
>Joe McGinn
Although this sounds somewhat different than your editorial, I'm sure it was
originally an oversight. Nothing raises my *** ire more than someone
implying that serious gamers only play the newest stuff, but you've come out
and responded in a good way here.
I fully agree that gamers like to at least play some of the newest
stuff...hey...that's part of what makes us serious gamers! :-)
If all goes according to plan (which so far it is), my Pentium 166 will be
replaced by a K6-2 450 in five weeks, then an AGP video card not too long
following that. It'll be nice to once again have a machine of decent power
after 26 months of rebuilding my computer setup from virtually nothing. NHL
2000 will probably be the first thing for me to try out again...
~NightSky 421~