rec.autos.simulators

Seat of your pants....

Goy Larse

Seat of your pants....

by Goy Larse » Wed, 02 Jul 2003 06:50:45


> Well, in my case it's not really an objective decision (and I wouldn't
> want it to be!) I like GPL because I've put enormous amounts of time
> into it and actually managed to become reasonably capable (which is
> more than I can say for most computer games), because I like the
> general feel of the community, and because in my own small way I've
> contributed something to it (GPLStat). None of those really have to do
> with the accuracy of the simulation! ;-)

Fair enough, everyone has their preferences and (dis)likes :-), but to
say that GPL hasn't been bettered, at least technically, is quite a
stretch

Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
"goyl at nettx dot no"

http://www.racesimcentral.net/

"A man is only as old as the woman he feels........"
--Groucho Marx--

Jan Verschuere

Seat of your pants....

by Jan Verschuere » Wed, 02 Jul 2003 07:44:00

Or whatever ridiculous displacement they run nowadays... sheesh. Bunch of
nitpickers. ;-)

Jan.
=---

Goy Larse

Seat of your pants....

by Goy Larse » Wed, 02 Jul 2003 07:48:24


> "Goy Larsen" wrote...
> > <snip>
> > If you can get a 427 past tech inspection I'm pretty
> > sure you'd run away from the field these days :-)

> Or whatever ridiculous displacement they run nowadays... sheesh. Bunch of
> nitpickers. ;-)

355 or something I think.....?

Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
"goyl at nettx dot no"

http://www.theuspits.com

"A man is only as old as the woman he feels........"
--Groucho Marx--

Jan Verschuere

Seat of your pants....

by Jan Verschuere » Wed, 02 Jul 2003 07:48:20

1) read the whole post and don't lift my argument out of context.

2) F1 engines don't have to last even nearly 300miles, only just over 300km.

Jan.
=---

Haqsa

Seat of your pants....

by Haqsa » Wed, 02 Jul 2003 09:24:41

So you're saying NR2003 is the most fun arcade racer you have ever played?

;o)


> Strongly disagree.  N2003 is much easier to drive than GPL 'cuz yer
getting
> so much more feedback from the physics engine...and much more fun 'cuz the
> car feels so much more alive!



> > As far as seat of the pants feel I think I get more from NR 2003, at
least
> > on the road courses.  Honestly I sometimes feel like I can feel the
> texture
> > of the pavement in NR2003, it's uncanny.  But admittedly in a lot of way
> > it's not as *fun* a feeling as GPL.  Yep, GPL is the most fun arcade
racer
> I
> > have ever played...

> > <runs away very very quickly>

Haqsa

Seat of your pants....

by Haqsa » Wed, 02 Jul 2003 09:28:15

<perks up>  What?  WHAT?  Tell us more!


Eldre

Seat of your pants....

by Eldre » Wed, 02 Jul 2003 10:39:06



>Ah, but that could easily be contributed to running mostly fixed setups
>that don't suit your (lack of) driving style :-)

Ouch...
<g>

Eldred
--
Help find missing child: Tatianna Ashley Chillcutt from Michigan(info on my
homepage)
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett

Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

Bruce Kennewel

Seat of your pants....

by Bruce Kennewel » Wed, 02 Jul 2003 11:56:02

Most enjoyable = best.
This IS a subjective thing, after all.

Most accurate = most accurate.
High accuracy does not necessarily relate to great enjoyment, or vice-versa.

Bruce.


> Nope :)

> Most enjoyable sim = most enjoyable sim

> Most accurate sim = best sim :)

> Achim



> ...
> > Most enjoyable sim = best sim. ;-)

Gerry Aitke

Seat of your pants....

by Gerry Aitke » Wed, 02 Jul 2003 15:11:39



>>Yep, still using a pedal for the clutch and a stick to shift.

>>But...

>>No matter how many revs I feed in the result is the some. I also defined
>>the clutch as a button and the result was the same. It just seems canned
>>to me.

> Still using RRC pedals Gerry ?

Sure am. :)

Are we talking BIG wheel spin and a snaking back end?

Gerry

Joachim Trens

Seat of your pants....

by Joachim Trens » Wed, 02 Jul 2003 16:35:05

Hi Bruce,

I was and am nit-picking with my tongue firmly in my cheek :-) but a sim's
purpose is to simulate well. The most accurate sim does this best, and hence
fulfills the purpose of a sim best, and consequently is... the best sim ;-)

But of course, using the word sim more leisurely, the more enjoyable
(racing) sim can also be the best (racing) sim - like you say, it's a matter
of personal preference.

Which brings me back to - N2k3 + converted road circuits = triple-wow! ;-)

Achim


> Most enjoyable = best.
> This IS a subjective thing, after all.

> Most accurate = most accurate.
> High accuracy does not necessarily relate to great enjoyment, or
vice-versa.

> Bruce.



> > Nope :)

> > Most enjoyable sim = most enjoyable sim

> > Most accurate sim = best sim :)

> > Achim



> > ...
> > > Most enjoyable sim = best sim. ;-)

Joachim Trens

Seat of your pants....

by Joachim Trens » Wed, 02 Jul 2003 16:30:03

Hi Gerry,

I'll send you a replay of spinning wheels later today. You're right of
course in that stalling the engine doesn't seem possible. However, there's
quite a penalty for not shifting into neutral or opening the clutch, as at
least for me, accelerating from idle revvs takes forever, at least that's
what it seems like to me. Considering that we're mostly using first gears
which are much longer than those in our street cars, I'd say this is even
realistic.

I can get the same effect you describe, though, when I use a very long first
gear. I have no idea with how long a first gear a Nascar clutch would still
be able to survive a few starts from standstill, but are you perhaps using a
fairly long first gear in general, and this in turn causes the no-wheel-spin
effect you're seeing? In which case this would be realistic, except that in
a real Nascar, dropping the clutch like this would stall the engine?

You should btw indeed get Dave Noonans converter. Without Dave's RCs I
wouldn't be driving N2k3 either. Not making this very clear when I'm talking
about N2k3 being so much better than GPL is probably a major inaccuracy on
my part.

But together with those RCs, N2k3 is such a blast, it beats every other sim
hands down, especially for online racing, as it offers more track feeling
than any other sim, more realistic car behaviour (you should see the Nascars
blast around the Ring, the way they drive looks so real you could think it's
a TV broadcast you're watching), and combines this with excellent online
racing, better even than GPL as some aspects of GPL's online behaviour have
even improved.

N2k3 + converted road circuits = wow! <g>

Achim



> > Gerry, old mate!! :)

> Ello mate :)

> >>you cannot spin the wheels from a standing start like you should
> >>be able to. That says to me that something is wrong in the
> >>physics department.

> > That statement surprises me, as I certainly can spin the wheels from a
> > standing start most easily - and once a certain minimum revv has been
> > reached, I can even make them spin anywhere throughout the entire revv
range
> > of first gear, sometimes even in second if it's set to a short ratio.
AAMOF
> > at least in first gear it's really difficult to _avoid_ spinning the
rear
> > wheels for me.

> This is what happens when I try:

> I give it some beans and drop the clutch, there's a little screech from
> the rears, a buff of smoke, then the revs die but the engine doesn't
> stall like I would in real life, and it chugs back into life. I've timed
> it 0 to 60 MPH with the default setup at watkins and can only do it in
7.4!

> > Maybe N2k3's analog clutch doesn't work properly? I've never had a
chance to
> > try that, but I think I remember you're using a real clutch. About the
only
> > diff between your system and mine that could cause this strange
difference.

> Yep, still using a pedal for the clutch and a stick to shift.

> But...

> No matter how many revs I feed in the result is the some. I also defined
> the clutch as a button and the result was the same. It just seems canned
> to me.

> Could you send me a reply of you spinning the rears please? I really
> don't understand what I'm doing wrong.

> > As for the sound, you indeed need to get used to N2k3's sound. At least
it's
> > a lot better than in all the older Nx sims. But, you can replace it, if
you
> > like. There are Cosworth-like engine sounds available. A guy in my
league
> > uses it (I think he created it himself).

> Ok I'll check out some of the sound add-ons.

> N2k3 is indeed more advanced than GPL in many areas, it's just that it
> doesn't light my fire as much as gpl. Maybe I need to get Noonans
> converter and beat Spa up with it?

> Gerry

Goy Larse

Seat of your pants....

by Goy Larse » Wed, 02 Jul 2003 16:45:15


> <perks up>  What?  WHAT?  Tell us more!

http://www.tptcc.com/board/viewtopic.php?t=291

Our main "body" guys, who've also done work on Pamela Anderson in the
past, are hard at work right now, wish I had some more recent pics to
share with you

Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
"goyl at nettx dot no"

http://www.theuspits.com

"A man is only as old as the woman he feels........"
--Groucho Marx--

Roge

Seat of your pants....

by Roge » Wed, 02 Jul 2003 16:48:52


Hey kid, they were doing things like that in racing and flight sims long
before Quake. Quake and Doom are overrated IMO.

Roge

Seat of your pants....

by Roge » Wed, 02 Jul 2003 16:50:51


Why would I remember those? I never even bought Quake. Did play it a few
times though. You think Air Quake is a flight sim now? Hehe... give me a
break.

Roge

Seat of your pants....

by Roge » Wed, 02 Jul 2003 16:53:58


Yea, so it's evolutionary, nothing REVOLUTIONARY about it!


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.