>>Serrious question:
>>Are we to take the views as expressive of Microprose, be it MPS Europe, or MPS
>>as a company, or take them as the expressed opinion of Mark Rich.
>Out of interest, in August last year, I took issue with one of Mr Rich's
>posts to this ng. He responded and I sent another email. This time someone
>else wrote back:
> Any retail title you see on a shelf that doesn't say something like "
> Officially Licenced Product" or "Endorsed by MicroProse", ( or
> something to that effect,) STEAR CLEAR OF THEM .... THEY ARE
> ILLEGAL ...... If you do come across something like this, please
> alert us as soon as possible. Last year, we gave away a bunch of
> free stuff to customers for helping us ferret out this junk.....
> I hope this answers your questions, and yes, you have my permission
> to post this e-mail to your forum ( in it's entirety..)
Again, much to this guys protestation's they are simply not illegal. MPS might
have you convinced that they are, and there are indeed behind the scenes many
court action procedding, but not have been of the outcome so far that indicate
this would be illegal.
Some companies think these things are bad, somecomes (Eidos springs to mind)
believe they are a very good part of the software world. Whether u would buy
one or not comes down to the customer, i would see. If they are clearly not
contianing any copyright code... then there can be no issue.
Quite obviously, they may not be endorsed by MPS, but this does not exactly
make it a bad product either.
Z.