> On Sat, 24 Feb 2001 05:44:19 GMT, Mike Donnelly Jr
> >Safety effort in NASCAR has always lagged behind
> >safety needs. CART and F1 have had that one area which they tend to shine.
> I think the higher safety consciousness due to a driver (or fan)
> fatality or near-fatality (ie: reactive vs. proactive safety measures)
> is true in all series, it's just human nature. You can find many
> hypothetical safety problems, but until the results are right in front
> of you, you don't fully comprehend the consequences.
> Think of wheel tethers (C***te and Michigan fans) or soft
> barriers (Blundell in Rio) in CART, chicanes (Senna) and greater head
> protection (Senna/Wendlinger) in F1, throttle cutoffs (A. Petty and
> Irwin) in NASCAR.
could ever prevent. Throttle cutoffs was the proverbial 'knee-jerk' reaction
that NASCAR claims it wants to avoid. Asking the drivers, it's rather useless.
I'd say the first really usefull safety item that came about as a proactive
measure (sort of) was the roof-flaps in NASCAR. Even then, it was a problem
that NASCAR had encountered and 'fixed' by adding the restrictor plate. Now
that speeds were coming up, they added the roof flaps to prevent cars from
flying into the grandstands. NASCAR hasn't ever been pro-active. Initiative is
something that is left to individual crew chiefs. Once they cross over and
start carrying a NASCAR badge, it goes out the window seemingly.
Question is, how many drivers have to die before NASCAR clues into the idea that
something is wrong?