Your confirmation that my belief was, in fact, correct, Frank.
If you read something into my sentence other than what was there then you
have provided additional confirmation that my assumption, in the first
place, was correct.
How you could infer that your behaviour is antisocial, from that sentence, I
haven't the faintest idea!!!
--
Regards,
Bruce Kennewell,
Canberra, Australia.
---------------------------
> > Once again I thank you, Frank, for your support and confirmation.
> Why do I sense some haughtiness and arrogance in your words Bruce? You
> choice of word "confirmation" is perhaps a cheap-shot at myself, an easy
way
> to say that I'm a confirmation that my behavior here is anti-social. Can
> you confirm the intend of your message? Hopefully I'm wrong, but you
always
> seem to have a hate attitude towards me and it tickles my mind.
> I wrote a hundred and seventy two pages on that subject (the chaotic
> situation of human communications/relations using new technologies). It's
> basically related to the emancipation of liberties and the sociological
> relation between interlocutors, how they visualise their words vs. their
> thoughts while writing whatever they have in mind.
> > > Bruce, it's not just your opinion, it's a fact. Long since the start
of
> > the
> > > Usenet (and the Internet) have opinions and words been written
> differently
> > > then if they were spoken in real-life. Both in a good and bad way.
The
> > > fact that it's the only free world (even though it's virtual) in
> existence
> > > makes it for the good and for the worst. Some people might be more
> > > arrogant, or ignorant, or anti-social, or dumb, or whatever you may
say,
> > but
> > > at the same time they are more real, more human, more social.
> --
> -- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
> -- May the Downforce be with you...
> -- http://www.ymenard.com/
> -- People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't
realise
> how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world.
