rec.autos.simulators

No-CD for the patch here!

Andre Warrin

No-CD for the patch here!

by Andre Warrin » Wed, 28 Nov 2001 18:05:07



Actually the FADE protection is in fact the first copy protection that
really seems to be effective - it can be cracked, eveything can be
cracked and it HAS been cracked, but it took quite a while before
someone managed that. And overruling the FADE system still requires
quite some hassle. Now the problems you had with the disc not being
recognized are stupid and annoying, but the FADE system was a very
clever protection.

I still have problems with N4 though, after I click the N4 icon
nothing happens, and it takes 30-60 seconds when N4 suddenly starts.

'Copy protections' are useless, allmost every game is being cracked
before it's even released in the stores. The only people having
problems with these copy protections are the buyers of the games.
If you want to protect your software / make life for the warez people
difficult, use some clever protections as the FADE system and not
these stupid, TOTALLY USELESS copy protections.

Derek Smart wrote on his Battlecruiser site that it was 'highly
unlikely' that the Battlecruiser 3000 protection would ever be
cracked. Right.. it was cracked before it was released.

A couple of years ago a game called Robocop (one of the first good 3d
action games) was released for the Amiga, with an 'unbeatable
protection system' the game was delivered with a dongle. The
protection system was much hyped by the publisher before the release
of the game as being 100% uncrackable'
But.. before the release of the game, cracked copies were send to a
couple of game mags to show how good the protection was.
Honest customers had to insert the dongle to play the game, ofcourse
with all sorts of hardware conflicts, while the warez people had nice
clean cracked copies that could be played without a dongle.

The best way to defeat your enemy is to know your enemy.. publishers
should look more into the warez world to see what's going on, what
would be effective and what would NOT be effective. FADE and online
key checks good, copy protections BAD. Releasing a patch? Make sure it
won't work with the warez copy. Yes, the patch will be cracked too,
but you can never avoid that, the best you can do is make life for the
warez people hard.

And release a representable demo of your game, so people don't have a
reason to try the warez version first.

Andre

Olav K. Malm

No-CD for the patch here!

by Olav K. Malm » Wed, 28 Nov 2001 18:17:50


> I still have problems with N4 though, after I click the N4 icon
> nothing happens, and it takes 30-60 seconds when N4 suddenly starts.

Andre, do the CloneCD/Daemon-tools trick, it cost around 500 MB of
your harddisk, but you will never have any problems starting N4 again.

--
Olav K. Malmin
remove .spam when replying

ikste

No-CD for the patch here!

by ikste » Wed, 28 Nov 2001 19:08:15



<snip my own crap>

> when you buy a software title you accecpt (almost in every country) some
> limitations as the prohibition of modifying in any kind parts of his (such
> as executable files).

Yes.  But since you guys break your obligation to provide software
which can be backed up, you give your customers no choice.  We
need to protect our original media from damage as we can't copy
it!

Seriously - I'd love to see EA try and prosecute a CUSTOMER for
running an "ease of use" tool to make their software more user friendly.
You remember what happened to Metallica with Napster?

It's not that my time is precious, it's just expensive.

FWIW - if I start the game less than 15 times between patches,
then you are correct, but I can download and install the no-cd
crack in 29 seconds (cable plus fast athlon).  As for warez sites
 - most no-cd files appear on FAN SITES.  Do you understand
yet?  Is the customer right yet?  Is the customer ever right with
EA?.

I think your responses to this thread pretty clearly advertise
the paradigm paralysis that yourself and EA are currently
experiencing.  If you wish to represent your employer well,
perhaps you should be intelligently discussing why EA take
this approach above others, how it has helped reduce piracy
(hahah) and therefore reduced game prices (ahahah) and
improved EA's bottom line and shareholder value.  Maybe
this would help us to understand and be reasonable about the
PITA that cd-checks are.

Put simply - the customer is right, EA is wrong.  EA are
slowing getting up there with M$ in terms of arrogance
and completely ignoring their customers (thank god for
the lads at ISI) and spouting policy at every turn.  So
depressing since Chuck Yeagers flight trainer - EA were
a cool company then.

iksteh

ikste

No-CD for the patch here!

by ikste » Wed, 28 Nov 2001 19:24:47

Op Flashpoint was cracked and released on warez before
it was on shelves.  I downloaded it, played it, loved it, bought
it two days later but I still run the patched cracked version.

Codemasters *did good*.  They got rewarded by getting
my money.  If the software had never been cracked and
released there is a good chance I would never have tried
the game and codemasters would not have had that sale.

FADE was snazzy but really - do you think the "failure"
mechanism makes any difference when usually the code is
just removed, bypassed or replaced anyway?

iksteh




<snip>
> Actually the FADE protection is in fact the first copy protection that
> really seems to be effective - it can be cracked, eveything can be
> cracked and it HAS been cracked, but it took quite a while before
> someone managed that. And overruling the FADE system still requires
> quite some hassle. Now the problems you had with the disc not being
> recognized are stupid and annoying, but the FADE system was a very
> clever protection.

<snip interesting reading>
Olav K. Malm

No-CD for the patch here!

by Olav K. Malm » Wed, 28 Nov 2001 19:28:40


> Op Flashpoint was cracked and released on warez before
> it was on shelves.  I downloaded it, played it, loved it, bought
> it two days later but I still run the patched cracked version.

> Codemasters *did good*.  They got rewarded by getting
> my money.  If the software had never been cracked and
> released there is a good chance I would never have tried
> the game and codemasters would not have had that sale.

Please be careful with such arguments.

--
Olav K. Malmin
remove .spam when replying

Andre Warrin

No-CD for the patch here!

by Andre Warrin » Wed, 28 Nov 2001 19:56:23


>Op Flashpoint was cracked and released on warez before
>it was on shelves.  I downloaded it, played it, loved it, bought
>it two days later but I still run the patched cracked version.

True, the FADE system was not enabled untill the release of the first
patch.. that was the moment when lots of people started to buy OF to
get rid of the FADE.

Same here. But that's the good thing about the FADE system - you can
still give the game a good try, but still you have to buy it if you
want to get rid of the FADE.

In this case, yes. For fun, read the OF forums at gamecopyworld.com
and see how good the protection is compared to all the other
protections. OF is afaik the only game that was -really- difficult to
crack, and it still requires a lot of hassle to get it cracked, even
with instructions.

Oh, btw, I DO have OF original, because it's simply one of this years
best games. I had some superb online sessions, too bad that there are
still quite some multiplayer problems though :(

Andre

Andre Warrin

No-CD for the patch here!

by Andre Warrin » Wed, 28 Nov 2001 20:03:13




>> Op Flashpoint was cracked and released on warez before
>> it was on shelves.  I downloaded it, played it, loved it, bought
>> it two days later but I still run the patched cracked version.

>> Codemasters *did good*.  They got rewarded by getting
>> my money.  If the software had never been cracked and
>> released there is a good chance I would never have tried
>> the game and codemasters would not have had that sale.

>Please be careful with such arguments.

I think his point was 'try before you buy', and I agree with him.
I honestly would have bought much fewer games if I didn't try them
first. I think I would have seen OF as just another fps shooter with
average graphics, untill I actually tried it and saw how deep the
gameplay was.

It's simple, release a fully working demo. After playing the IL2 demo
I can't wait for it to show up in the stores.

GPL? Like others I couldn't get the demo running on my pc.
A couple of months later I saw the warez version.. Wondered if it
would be worth the hassle of downloading, but I was totally bored so I
downloaded it. After the very first lap I was amazed.. I bought GPL
the very first day it was in the stores in Holland, about a month
after I downloaded that warez version..

Last game I bought on instinct, based on previews was SoS37.. says
enough I think :)

Andre

Olav K. Malm

No-CD for the patch here!

by Olav K. Malm » Wed, 28 Nov 2001 20:30:51


> Oh, btw, I DO have OF original, because it's simply one of this years
> best games. I had some superb online sessions, too bad that there are
> still quite some multiplayer problems though :(

When I get my ADSL connection going, tell me when where and when, and
I'll shoot your ***off. :)

--
Olav K. Malmin
remove .spam when replying

Andre Warrin

No-CD for the patch here!

by Andre Warrin » Wed, 28 Nov 2001 22:18:01




>> Oh, btw, I DO have OF original, because it's simply one of this years
>> best games. I had some superb online sessions, too bad that there are
>> still quite some multiplayer problems though :(

>When I get my ADSL connection going, tell me when where and when, and
>I'll shoot your ***off. :)

You better watch out.. in OF I'm more deadly than Surtees is at
Monza..

Andre

Jens H. Kruus

No-CD for the patch here!

by Jens H. Kruus » Thu, 29 Nov 2001 01:59:38





> >  One thing about this whole thread.  If you are an EA employee...

> Didn't Fluffypony also tell us he was an EA employee?
> Am I on to something here? :)

You mean, they only hire jerks?

Andr, you have no chance of getting hired!

Eldre

No-CD for the patch here!

by Eldre » Thu, 29 Nov 2001 03:59:53



>you can't modify original files; it's a limitation that you accept when you
>buy a software title.

The .ini files are original - we can't modify those either...?

Eldred
--
Dale Earnhardt, Sr. R.I.P. 1951-2001
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
GPLRank - under construction...

Never argue with an idiot.  He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

Eldre

No-CD for the patch here!

by Eldre » Thu, 29 Nov 2001 03:59:53



>Its great how because its inconvienent for the legitimate owners, they even
>will rationalize that software piracy is ok.  

How do you draw that conclusion?  I'd be willing to bet that very FEW people
here condone software piracy...

Eldred
--
Dale Earnhardt, Sr. R.I.P. 1951-2001
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
GPLRank - under construction...

Never argue with an idiot.  He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

Eldre

No-CD for the patch here!

by Eldre » Thu, 29 Nov 2001 03:59:53





>> The CD-Check on retail software does not discourage piracy.
>> Quite the reverse.  I suppose EA subscribe to prohibitionist
>> doctrines as well?

>> I use no-cd on a legal copy of this game btw.  All protection
>> does is***off legitimate users and slow loading times.

>> iksteh
>with complete installation cd is required only to check that you've original
>copy of the game, no files are loaded from cd.during the game.
>this step is only one or two seconds long.
>if you've regular cd, install the official patch and play the game.
>if cd is damaged go to ea support page and ask for sostitution:soon  your
>local store will give you a new copy

At how much cost?

Eldred
--
Dale Earnhardt, Sr. R.I.P. 1951-2001
Homepage - http://www.racesimcentral.net/~epickett
GPLRank - under construction...

Never argue with an idiot.  He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

Eldre

No-CD for the patch here!

by Eldre » Thu, 29 Nov 2001 03:59:53


Someone has suggested that before...can't remember who. :(

No, I'm not tidy, and I have 150+ games and programs that I've bought over the
years.  I've had MANY times that I couldn't find the CD that I wanted to play
at that moment.  So much for "playablilty"...<g>

Eldred
--
Dale Earnhardt, Sr. R.I.P. 1951-2001
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
GPLRank - under construction...

Never argue with an idiot.  He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

Ronald Stoeh

No-CD for the patch here!

by Ronald Stoeh » Thu, 29 Nov 2001 05:32:01


snip

> and besides - the only people who ever EVER excute
> the copy protection routines in your software are the
> legal owners of the software.  Don't you realise the 000's
> you spend on this protection is simply fuel for the cracker
> races out in warez land?  If you guys didn't copy protect
> your software, there wouldn't be cracking crews and all
> the cool coders would get back to demos like in the amiga
> days.

No, "THEY" would still be stealing software, but at least the "few"
remaining paying customers would not be consistently be pissed
off about stupid protection schemes.

"No, Sir, your CD drive is not compatibel to our software!"

--
l8er
ronny

Your mouse has moved. Windows must be restarted for the change
to take effect. Reboot now?
          |\      _,,,---,,_        I want to die like my Grandfather,
   ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_              in his sleep.
        |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'     Not like the people in his car,
       '---''(_/--'  `-'\_)            screaming their heads off!


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.