rec.autos.simulators

by **Brian Needha** » Tue, 15 Dec 1998 04:00:00

If you can beat or get near to these times below you could get in to the top
5 tables.

Kyalami - Lotus - 1.20.27
Mexico - Lotus - 1.47.89
Monza - Lotus - 1.28.73
Rouen - Lotus - 1.59.56
Watkins Glen - Lotus - 1.04.78
Zandvoort - Lotus - 1.04.78

Kyalami - Eagle - 1.21.19
Monza - Eagle - 1.28.44

Mexico - Coventry - 1.51.65

Monza - Murasami - 1.29.90
Rouen - Murasami - 2.00.26
Spa - Murasami - 2.23.81

On my site you will find replays and setups to all of these laps.
I am also looking for a lot of laps to fill up all of the tables.

Please come and visit the site www.brian.needham.clara.net and send me your
fastest laps in all of the cars.

by **David Ewin** » Tue, 15 Dec 1998 04:00:00

> If you can beat or get near to these times below you could get in to the top
> 5 tables.
> Zandvoort - Lotus - 1.04.78

Wow. That is fast! Brian, I think you made a cut and paste error from
Watkins Glen.

Dave Ewing

by **Rick Baumhaue** » Tue, 15 Dec 1998 04:00:00

And I don't think that 2:23 at Spa is accurate, either..................

by **Remco Moe** » Tue, 15 Dec 1998 04:00:00

>Zandvoort - Lotus - 1.04.78

Wow!

Wow! again.

Remco

by **Roo** » Tue, 15 Dec 1998 04:00:00

On Mon, 14 Dec 1998 22:04:10 -0000, "Brian Needham"

>If you can beat or get near to these times below you could get in to the top
>5 tables.
>Spa - Murasami - 2.23.81

Wow. Great lap.

by **KPineb** » Wed, 16 Dec 1998 04:00:00

>Spa - Murasami - 2.23.81

Whoa! I bet those spectators*** at the fence at Masta moved back a few
feet!

Pinebox

by **SteveBla** » Wed, 16 Dec 1998 04:00:00

Nahhhh, they're all dead after my last effort at a no-lift navigation of the
Kink. Check your game. I'm sure I hit hard enough to kill ALL of 'em.

Steve B.

remove "edy" from address for email

by **Mark S. Mille** » Wed, 16 Dec 1998 04:00:00

>If you can beat or get near to these times below you could get in to the
top
>5 tables.
>Spa - Murasami - 2.23.81

Just checked his site ... this is really 3:23.81 ... which is still damn
good, but not the kind of time-bending that a 2:23 would require.

-"Jethro Bodine"

by **Brian Needha** » Wed, 16 Dec 1998 04:00:00

Sorry about the errors I will sort them out.

>>If you can beat or get near to these times below you could get in to the
>top
>>5 tables.

>>Spa - Murasami - 2.23.81

>Just checked his site ... this is really 3:23.81 ... which is still damn
>good, but not the kind of time-bending that a 2:23 would require.

> -"Jethro Bodine"

by **Hamm** » Wed, 16 Dec 1998 04:00:00

>>Spa - Murasami - 2.23.81

Umm, pardon my ignorance... I assume this is a joke?

-=Hammer
remove x fer email reply

by **Brian Needha** » Wed, 16 Dec 1998 04:00:00

Sorry it should have been 3.23.81

>>>Spa - Murasami - 2.23.81

>Umm, pardon my ignorance... I assume this is a joke?

>-=Hammer
>remove x fer email reply

by **J. Paul Godfer** » Wed, 16 Dec 1998 04:00:00

Hahahahahahaha..... Good one!

> >Spa - Murasami - 2.23.81

> Whoa! I bet those spectators*** at the fence at Masta moved back
> a few
> feet!

> Pinebox

by **Hamm** » Thu, 17 Dec 1998 04:00:00

On Tue, 15 Dec 1998 21:08:24 -0000, "Brian Needham"

>Sorry it should have been 3.23.81

Hehe, no prob Brian... I was just confused. I knew I was slow...
but sheesh, I would have been more than a full minute off yer
time with my best Spa lap (3:26.7)! Ouch! :)

Hey, that's still an EXCELLENT lap dude... gr8 drivin!!

-=Hammer
remove the x fer email reply

rec.autos.simulators

New Fastest Laps - GPL

New Fastest Laps - GPL

New Fastest Laps - GPL

New Fastest Laps - GPL

New Fastest Laps - GPL

New Fastest Laps - GPL

New Fastest Laps - GPL

New Fastest Laps - GPL

New Fastest Laps - GPL

New Fastest Laps - GPL

New Fastest Laps - GPL

New Fastest Laps - GPL

New Fastest Laps - GPL

New Fastest Laps - GPL