>> Get your sim reviews on USENET
>> from proven, reliable sources...
>Yes indeed classic Ego Maniac
>tendencies !!!!!! We have also looked
>into your signature file. Hmm we will
>have to discuss this soon. How long
>has your grandfather been gone?
LOL, anyone know why 2 trolls come here at the same time ? (Mr. Mak and
him).
Btw, why are you on the USENET Mr.Not ? Isn't the Usenet supposed to be a
way to discuss your opinions. We all know here (and it's a fact proven
since many years) that PC Magazine's racing reviews aren't always very
neutral, and tend to mislead many "rookies", in a search of a realistic or
arcade racing title.
Most of them are influenced by numbers of factors. Those reviewers normally
aren't really some hard-core SimRacers, but all-around game lovers who have
a limited knowledge of racing physics.
I can recall only Randy Magruder, who IMHO is the only trustful website/PC
Magazine reviewer (well, maybe with Mrs. Allison also). Each of them have a
very good knowledge in racing simulators.
But Mr. Not, what do you know about racing simulators ? For the second time
I ask you what are your present and pass racing experience, virtual or in
real life. Maybe you should lurk a little bit more here and read the FAQ,
it's seems that troll aren't very well accepted (for very obvious reasons).
Not that I'm against you, people can change, I really understand that. I'm
the type of people who gives a second chance to many people. It's up to you
to show that you have your own valid opinions and thoughts here about racing
simulators (this is still rec.autos.simulators, not alt.flame).
Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard> Good race at the Brickyard, (-o-)
Official Mentally retarded guy of r.a.s.
Member of the r.a.s. Ego-maniac club
Excuse me for my English (I'm French speaking)
Excuse me for being provocative (I'm dumb speaking)
--"People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."--